Study Stopped
sponsor decision, unrelated to safety
AMG 176 First in Human Trial in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 1 First in Human Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of AMG 176 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
2 other identifiers
interventional
141
5 countries
24
Brief Summary
The main objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AMG 176 monotherapy in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and participants with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_1
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 27, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 9, 2025
CompletedJuly 9, 2025
June 1, 2025
8 years
December 22, 2015
May 22, 2025
June 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
A DLT was assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0, and considered by the investigators to be related to AMG 176. A DLT was defined as a grade 3 or higher non-hematological or a grade 4 hematologic adverse event (AE) that occurred during the DLT observation period. CTCAE is graded from grade 1 to 5, with higher grades indicating a worse outcome, and included; grade 1 = mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life-threatening, and grade 5 = death.
Days 1 to 28 of cycle 1 (4 weeks)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant. A TEAE was an AE that started on or after the first dose of investigational product (AMG 176) up to 30 days after the end of investigational product. Any clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory tests were reported as TEAEs. A treatment-related AE was any TEAE that per investigator review had a reasonable possibility of being caused by the investigational product (AMG 176).
Day 1 cycle 1 to 30 days after the last dose of AMG 176; median treatment duration was 1.2 months
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 176
Plasma concentrations of AMG 176 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 5.00 ng/mL were set to zero before data analysis.
Parts 1B, 3B, 3C, 3A (cohort 4) Cycle 1: day 1 pre, end of infusion (EOI), 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 hrs EOI, day 8 pre, EOI; Part 3D also days 9, 15 pre and EOI; Parts 1A, 3 (except cohort 4), 4: also day 2 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 hrs EOI, day 9 pre and EOI
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of AMG 176 (Parts 1A, 3A [Cohorts 1, 2, and 3], and 4 [Cohorts 5A and 5B])
Plasma concentrations of AMG 176 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ of 5.00 ng/mL were set to zero before data analysis.
Parts 1A, 3A and, 4: Cycle 1 day 1 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 hrs EOI, cycle 1 day 8 pre and EOI
AUC From Time 0 to 144 Hours (AUC0-144) of AMG 176 (Parts 1A, 3A [Cohorts 1, 2, and 3], and 4 [Cohorts 5A and 5B])
Plasma concentrations of AMG 176 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ of 5.00 ng/mL were set to zero before data analysis.
Parts 1A, 3A, and 4: Cycle 1 day 2 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 hrs EOI, cycle 1 day 9 pre and EOI
AUC From Time 0 to 168 Hours (AUC0-168) of AMG 176 (Parts 1B, 3 [Cohort 4], 3B, 3C, and 3D)
Plasma concentrations of AMG 176 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ of 5.00 ng/mL were set to zero before data analysis.
Parts 1B, 3B, 3C, and 3 (cohort 4): Cycle 1 day 1 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 hrs EOI, cycle 1 day 8 pre, EOI; Part 3d also cycle 1 day 15 pre and EOI
Clearance (CL) of AMG 176
Plasma concentrations of AMG 176 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ of 5.00 ng/mL were set to zero before data analysis. Clearance was calculated as Dose/ AUC0-144 for Parts 1A, 3A, and 4; and as Dose/AUC0-168 for Parts 1B, 3 (Cohort 4 only) 3B, 3C, and 3D.
Parts 1B, 3B, 3C, 3A (cohort 4) Cycle 1: day 1 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 hrs EOI, day 8 pre, EOI; Part 3D also days 9, 15 pre and EOI; Parts 1A, 3 (except cohort 4), 4: also day 2 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 hrs EOI, day 9 pre and EOI
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of AMG 176
Plasma concentrations of AMG 176 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ of 5.00 ng/mL were set to zero before data analysis.
Parts 1B, 3B, 3C, 3A (cohort 4) Cycle 1: day 1 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 hrs EOI, day 8 pre, EOI; Part 3D also days 9, 15 pre and EOI; Parts 1A, 3 (except cohort 4), 4: also day 2 pre, EOI, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 hrs EOI, day 9 pre and EOI
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Best Overall Response According to Revised International Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC) for MM Participants (Parts 1A and 1B)
Day 1 cycle 1 to end of study; median duration from start of study treatment to end of study for all participants was 2.2 months
Best Overall Response According to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Criteria in AML Participants (Parts 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and 4)
Day 1 cycle 1 to end of study; median duration from start of study treatment to end of study for all participants was 2.2 months
Study Arms (8)
AMG 176 - Part 1a
EXPERIMENTALPart 1a - Participants with muliple myeloma (MM) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion for two-consecutive days (QD2) followed by a 5 days break.
AMG 176 - Part 1b
EXPERIMENTALPart 1b - Participants with multiple myeloma (MM) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion, once a week (QW) followed by 6 days break.
AMG 176 - Part 3a
EXPERIMENTALPart 3a - Participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once a day, for two-consecutive days (QD2) followed by a 5 day break.
AMG 176 - Part 3b
EXPERIMENTALPart 3b - Participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion, once a week (QW) followed by 6 days break.
AMG 176 - Part 3c
EXPERIMENTALPart 3c - Participants in Japan only with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion, once a week (QW) followed by 6 days break.
AMG 176 - Part 3d
EXPERIMENTALPart 3d - Participants in the United States with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion, once a week (QW), for 3 weeks, in combination with itraconazole.
AMG 176 - Part 4
EXPERIMENTALPart 4 - Participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion, either once a week (QW) followed by 6 days break, or once a day, for two-consecutive days (QD2), in combination with azacitidine.
AMG 176 - Part 5
EXPERIMENTALPart 5 - Participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) administered AMG 176 as an intravenous (IV) infusion at the maximum tolerated combination dose from Part 4, either once a week (QW) followed by 6 days break, or once a day, for two-consecutive days (QD2), in combination with azacitidine.
Interventions
Study Drug
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For participants in Japan only: if a participant is younger than 20 years at the time of signing the informed consent form, informed consent must be obtained from both the participant and his/her legal representative
- (Multiple myeloma \[MM\] participants) Pathologically documented, multiple myeloma relapsed or refractory disease after at least 2 lines of therapy
- (MM participants only) Measurable disease per the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria
- (Acute myeloid leukemia \[AML\] participants) AML as defined by the World Health Organization Classification persisting or recurring following one or more treatment courses, and for participants in Japan, determined by the investigator to be not eligible for approved anticancer drug therapy in Japan; EXCEPT acute promyelocytic leukemia.
- (AML participants only) More than 5% blasts in bone marrow and Circulating white blood cells \< 25,000/ul.
- Must be willing and able to undergo a core bone marrow biopsy (MM participants only) and bone marrow aspirate (MM and AML participants) at screening.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 2,
- (MM partiicpants only) Satisfactory hematological function without transfusion or growth factor support
- Life expectancy of \> 3 months, in the opinion of the investigator
- Adequate hepatic function
- Adequate cardiac function
- Adequate renal function
- Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test
You may not qualify if:
- Previously received an allogeneic stem cell transplant within 6 months OR having received immunosuppressive therapy within the last three months OR having signs or symptoms of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease
- Autologous stem cell transplant less than 90 days prior to study day 1
- (MM participants only) MM with Immunoglobulin M subtype
- (MM participants only) Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal protein, Skin changes syndrome
- (MM participants only) Existing plasma cell leukemia
- (MM participants only) Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia
- (MM participants only) Amyloidosis
- Infection requiring intravenous anti-infective treatments within 1 week of study enrollment (day 1)
- Myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrollment, symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \> class II)
- History of arterial thrombosis (eg, stroke or transient ischemic attack) in the past 6 months prior to enrollment
- Currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study. Other investigational procedures while participating in this study will be allowed if approved by Amgen medical monitor
- Participants with elevated cardiac troponin above the manufacturer's 99th percentile upper reference limit for ADVIA Centaur XP assay at screening performed by the central laboratory
- Participants with evidence of recent cardiac injury at screening based on creatine kinase-muscle/brain, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, and electrocardiogram
- (AML Part 3d only) History of QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardia and cardiac arrest
- History or evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection unless agreed upon with medical monitor.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (24)
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Northside Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
University of Chicago Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
University Medical Center New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Universitaetsklinikum der Rheinisch-Westfaelischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen
Aachen, 52074, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53127, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89081, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg
Würzburg, 97080, Germany
National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 460-0001, Japan
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center
Okayama, Okayama-ken, 701-1192, Japan
NTT Medical Center Tokyo
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625, Japan
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was conducted in multiple parts and Part 5 did not enroll any participants due to early termination of the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2015
First Posted
February 5, 2016
Study Start
June 13, 2016
Primary Completion
May 27, 2024
Study Completion
May 27, 2024
Last Updated
July 9, 2025
Results First Posted
July 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.