NCT02643004

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the clinical performance of senofilcon A lens with the stenfilcon A lens each for one week of daily disposable wear.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2015

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 28, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 30, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 31, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 23, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 28, 2015

Results QC Date

February 13, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Ocular Physiology

    Ocular physiology assessment of senofilcon A and stenfilcon A lenses by biomicroscopy for the following: corneal staining, conjunctival hyperaemia, limbal hyperaemia, and conjunctival staining. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe.

    Baseline and 1 week

  • Overall Subjective Score of Lenses

    Subjective responses will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, 100=excellent.

    Baseline and 1 week

  • Comfort

    Subjective responses for comfort will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=causes pain, cannot be tolerated, 100=excellent, cannot be felt.

    Baseline and 1 week

  • Dryness

    Subjective responses for dryness will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, high levels of dryness, 100=excellent, no dryness.

    1 week

  • Vision

    Subjective responses for vision will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn, 100=excellent.

    Baseline and 1 week

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Horizontal Centration

    Baseline

  • Horizontal Centration

    1 Week

  • Vertical Centration

    Baseline

  • Vertical Centration

    1 Week

  • Lens Movement

    Baseline

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Senofilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants were randomized to wear senofilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study.

Device: Senofilcon A

Stenfilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study.

Device: Stenfilcon A

Interventions

contact lens

Senofilcon A

contact lens

Stenfilcon A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:
  • They are of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
  • They have a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to - 6.00D (inclusive)
  • They have a spectacle cylindrical correction of -0.75D or less in each eye.
  • At dispensing, they can attain at least 0.10 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses within the available power range.
  • They currently use soft contact lenses or have done so in the previous six months.
  • They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least six days per week and for at least eight hours per day).

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if:
  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have had cataract surgery.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or lactating.
  • They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
  • They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
  • They currently wear either MyDay (daily) or the Acuvue Oasys (2 weekly) lens.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eurolens Research - The University of Manchester

Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sr. Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs
Organization
CooperVision Inc.

Study Officials

  • Carole Maldonado-Codinal, PhD

    Eurolens Research, University of Manchester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2015

First Posted

December 30, 2015

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

August 23, 2017

Results First Posted

March 31, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07

Locations