Daily Disposable Dispensing Clinical Trial of Test Lens Against Stenfilcon A Lens
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the overall clinical performance of the test daily disposable stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) compared to the stenfilcon A lens (control).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 26, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 9, 2020
CompletedJuly 21, 2020
July 1, 2020
4 months
January 17, 2017
June 19, 2020
July 8, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (22)
Subjective Ratings on Comfort
Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable
Baseline
Subjective Ratings on Comfort
Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable
1 Week
Subjective Ratings on Comfort
Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable
1 Month
Vision Satisfaction
Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree
Baseline
Vision Satisfaction
Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree
1 week
Vision Satisfaction
Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree
1 Month
Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast
Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast logMAR charts for test and control lenses. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart.
Baseline
Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast
Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart.
1 Week
Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast
Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart.
1 Month
Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast
Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart.
Baseline
Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast
Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart.
1 Week
Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast
Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart.
1 Month
Overall Corneal Staining
Overall corneal staining is assessed for test and control lens in a scale of 0-4, 0=No staining,1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=Severe.
One Week
Overall Corneal Staining
Overall corneal staining is assessed for test and control lens in a scale of 0-4, 0=No staining,1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=Severe.
One Month
Conjunctival Staining
Conjunctival staining is assessed for test and control lens in 0.50 steps. Scale 0-4, 0=None, 4= Deep confluent
1 Week
Conjunctival Staining
Conjunctival staining is assessed for test and control lens in 0.50 steps. Scale 0-4, 0=None, 4= Deep confluent
1 Month
Bulbar Hyperemia
Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection)
1 Week
Bulbar Hyperemia
Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection)
1 Month
Limbal Hyperemia
Limbal hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection)
1 Week
Limbal Hyperemia
Limbal hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection)
1 Month
Palpebral Hyperemia
Palpebral hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection)
1 Week
Palpebral Hyperemia
Palpebral hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection)
1 Month
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Lens Fit Acceptance
Baseline
Lens Fit Acceptance
1 week
Lens Fit Acceptance
1 Month
Handling Satisfaction
1 week
Handling Satisfaction
1 Month
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were randomized to wear the stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) for 1 month during the cross over study.
stenfilcon A lens (control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A (control) lens pair for 1 month during the cross over study.
Interventions
silicone hydrogel lens
contact lens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years.
- Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
- Has read and understood the information consent letter.
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
- Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction or 20/20 best-corrected.
- Must achieve 20/30 or better (in each eye) with study lenses
- Requires spectacle lens powers between -0.75 and -6.50 diopters sphere (0.25D steps).
- Has no more than 0.75 diopters of refractive astigmatism.
- Currently wears soft contact lenses.
- Have clear corneas and no active ocular disease.
- Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the examination
You may not qualify if:
- A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Has never worn contact lenses before.
- Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health.
- Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses.
- Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye.
- Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
- Is aphakic.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- Is pregnant, lactating, or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit).
- Have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within one week prior to starting this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Clinical Optical Research Lab (CORL)
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States
The Ocular Surface Institute (TOSI)
Houston, Texas, 77204, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Myhanh Nguyen, OD, FAAO
- Organization
- CooperVision, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pete Kollbaum, OD, PhD
Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Ritchey, OD, PhD, FAAO
University of Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2017
First Posted
January 19, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 25, 2017
Study Completion
June 26, 2017
Last Updated
July 21, 2020
Results First Posted
July 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share