Clinical Performance of Stenfilcon A Versus Filcon II 3
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clinical Performance of Stenfilcon vs. Filcon II 3
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 19, 2015
CompletedAugust 3, 2020
July 1, 2020
3 months
February 14, 2013
November 3, 2014
July 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Baseline
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 1 week wear for each lens.(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
1 week
Handling
Participant rating for lens handling. Collected at 1 week. (Insertion: 0-100, 0= could not get it in and 100= went in without a problem. Removal: 0= could not get it out and 100= came out without a problem. Blister: 0=impossible and 100=came out extremely easily).
1 Week
Comfort
Participant rating of lens comfort. Collected at baseline for habitual pair. (0-100; 0=very uncomfortable,100=extreme comfort / cannot feel them at all)
Baseline
Comfort
Participant rating for comfort. Collected at 1 week. (0-100, 0= very uncomfortable and 100= extreme comfort/cannot feel them at all).
1 Week
Dryness
Participant rating of lens dryness. Collected at baseline for habitual pair. (0-100; 0=very uncomfortable, 100=extreme comfort/ cannot feel them at all)
Baseline
Dryness
Participant rating for dryness. Collected at 1 week. (0-100, 0= very uncomfortable and 100= extreme comfort/cannot feel them at all).
1 Week
Vision Quality
Participant rating of vision quality. Collected at baseline for habitual lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Baseline
Vision Quality
Participant rating of vision quality. Collected at 1 week. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
1 Week
Eye Whiteness
Participant rating for eye whiteness. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= total redness and 100= totally white).
Baseline
Eye Whiteness
Participant rating for eye whiteness. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= total redness and 100= totally white).
1 Week
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= extremely dissatisfied and 100= extremely satisfied).
Baseline
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 1 week for study lenses. (0-100, 0= extremely dissatisfied and 100= extremely satisfied).
1 Week
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of Monocular (MHCVA) Right eye (OD), left eye (OS) and Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at baseline for habitual lens. logMAR.
Baseline
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of Monocular (MHCVA) Right eye (OD), left eye (OS) and Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at dispense for study lenses. logMAR.
Dispense
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at 1 week for study lenses. logMAR
1 Week
Wettability
Participant rating for surface wettability. Collected at 1 week. Tear film analysis in seconds.
1 Week
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Blood Vessel Coverage
Baseline
Blood Vessel Coverage
1 Week
Conjunctival Redness
Baseline
Conjunctival Redness
1 Week
Corneal Staining
Baseline
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
stenfilcon A
EXPERIMENTALParticipants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.
filcon II 3
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.
Interventions
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Based on his/her knowledge, must be in good general health. Be of legal age (18 years) or older.
- Be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and complete all specified evaluation.
- Read, indicate understanding of, and sign Written Informed Consent (Appendix 1)
- Require a contact lens prescription between -0.50 and -6.00 and have no more than -.75dioptor (D) of astigmatism in both eyes
- Achieve visual acuity of 6/9 or better in each eye with a spherical contact lens prescription.
- An existing soft contact lens wearer of any modality.
- Must be able to wear their lenses at least 6 full days over the 7 days; 14 hours per day, assuming there are no contraindications for doing so.
- Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
- No amblyopia.
- No evidence of lid abnormality or infection (e.g. entropion, ectropion, chalazia, recurrent styes).
- No clinically significant slit lamp findings (e.g. infiltrates or other slit lamp findings greater than Grade 2: corneal edema, tarsal abnormalities, and conjunctival injection).
- No other active ocular disease (e.g. glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, cornea \[infiltrates\], conjunctiva, lids, and intraocular infection or inflammation of an allergic, bacterial, or viral etiology.)
- No aphakia
You may not qualify if:
- Neophytes, who have not worn lenses before
- Greater than 0.75D of refractive astigmatism in either eye
- Presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or above) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
- Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- Pathological dry eye or associated findings
- Pterygium, pinguecula or corneal scars within the visual axis
- Neovascularization \> 0.75 mm in from the limbus
- Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) Grade 3 or above
- Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
- Seborrheic eczema, seborrheic conjunctivitis
- History of corneal ulcer or fungal infections
- Poor personal hygiene
- A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity).
- Contact lens best corrected Snellen visual acuities (VA) worse than 6/9
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Aston
Birmingham, West Midlands, B4 7ET, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jonathan Walker
- Organization
- Opthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Wolffsohn, PhD
University of Aston Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2013
First Posted
March 11, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 3, 2020
Results First Posted
January 19, 2015
Record last verified: 2020-07