NCT01808209

Brief Summary

Clinical Performance of Stenfilcon vs. Filcon II 3

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 14, 2013

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2013

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 19, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 3, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

February 14, 2013

Results QC Date

November 3, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (17)

  • Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time

    Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)

    Baseline

  • Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time

    Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 1 week wear for each lens.(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)

    1 week

  • Handling

    Participant rating for lens handling. Collected at 1 week. (Insertion: 0-100, 0= could not get it in and 100= went in without a problem. Removal: 0= could not get it out and 100= came out without a problem. Blister: 0=impossible and 100=came out extremely easily).

    1 Week

  • Comfort

    Participant rating of lens comfort. Collected at baseline for habitual pair. (0-100; 0=very uncomfortable,100=extreme comfort / cannot feel them at all)

    Baseline

  • Comfort

    Participant rating for comfort. Collected at 1 week. (0-100, 0= very uncomfortable and 100= extreme comfort/cannot feel them at all).

    1 Week

  • Dryness

    Participant rating of lens dryness. Collected at baseline for habitual pair. (0-100; 0=very uncomfortable, 100=extreme comfort/ cannot feel them at all)

    Baseline

  • Dryness

    Participant rating for dryness. Collected at 1 week. (0-100, 0= very uncomfortable and 100= extreme comfort/cannot feel them at all).

    1 Week

  • Vision Quality

    Participant rating of vision quality. Collected at baseline for habitual lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred 100=excellent vision totally sharp)

    Baseline

  • Vision Quality

    Participant rating of vision quality. Collected at 1 week. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred 100=excellent vision totally sharp)

    1 Week

  • Eye Whiteness

    Participant rating for eye whiteness. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= total redness and 100= totally white).

    Baseline

  • Eye Whiteness

    Participant rating for eye whiteness. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= total redness and 100= totally white).

    1 Week

  • Overall Satisfaction

    Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= extremely dissatisfied and 100= extremely satisfied).

    Baseline

  • Overall Satisfaction

    Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 1 week for study lenses. (0-100, 0= extremely dissatisfied and 100= extremely satisfied).

    1 Week

  • Visual Acuity logMAR

    Assessment of Monocular (MHCVA) Right eye (OD), left eye (OS) and Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at baseline for habitual lens. logMAR.

    Baseline

  • Visual Acuity logMAR

    Assessment of Monocular (MHCVA) Right eye (OD), left eye (OS) and Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at dispense for study lenses. logMAR.

    Dispense

  • Visual Acuity logMAR

    Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at 1 week for study lenses. logMAR

    1 Week

  • Wettability

    Participant rating for surface wettability. Collected at 1 week. Tear film analysis in seconds.

    1 Week

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Blood Vessel Coverage

    Baseline

  • Blood Vessel Coverage

    1 Week

  • Conjunctival Redness

    Baseline

  • Conjunctival Redness

    1 Week

  • Corneal Staining

    Baseline

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

stenfilcon A

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.

Device: filcon II 3

filcon II 3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.

Device: stenfilcon A

Interventions

Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.

Also known as: stenfilcon A (Daily Disposable Contact Lens)
filcon II 3

Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.

Also known as: filcon II 3 (Daily Disposable Contact Lens)
stenfilcon A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Based on his/her knowledge, must be in good general health. Be of legal age (18 years) or older.
  • Be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and complete all specified evaluation.
  • Read, indicate understanding of, and sign Written Informed Consent (Appendix 1)
  • Require a contact lens prescription between -0.50 and -6.00 and have no more than -.75dioptor (D) of astigmatism in both eyes
  • Achieve visual acuity of 6/9 or better in each eye with a spherical contact lens prescription.
  • An existing soft contact lens wearer of any modality.
  • Must be able to wear their lenses at least 6 full days over the 7 days; 14 hours per day, assuming there are no contraindications for doing so.
  • Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
  • No amblyopia.
  • No evidence of lid abnormality or infection (e.g. entropion, ectropion, chalazia, recurrent styes).
  • No clinically significant slit lamp findings (e.g. infiltrates or other slit lamp findings greater than Grade 2: corneal edema, tarsal abnormalities, and conjunctival injection).
  • No other active ocular disease (e.g. glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, cornea \[infiltrates\], conjunctiva, lids, and intraocular infection or inflammation of an allergic, bacterial, or viral etiology.)
  • No aphakia

You may not qualify if:

  • Neophytes, who have not worn lenses before
  • Greater than 0.75D of refractive astigmatism in either eye
  • Presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or above) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
  • Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
  • Pathological dry eye or associated findings
  • Pterygium, pinguecula or corneal scars within the visual axis
  • Neovascularization \> 0.75 mm in from the limbus
  • Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) Grade 3 or above
  • Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
  • Seborrheic eczema, seborrheic conjunctivitis
  • History of corneal ulcer or fungal infections
  • Poor personal hygiene
  • A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity).
  • Contact lens best corrected Snellen visual acuities (VA) worse than 6/9
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Aston

Birmingham, West Midlands, B4 7ET, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jonathan Walker
Organization
Opthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

Study Officials

  • James Wolffsohn, PhD

    University of Aston Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2013

First Posted

March 11, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

August 3, 2020

Results First Posted

January 19, 2015

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations