Comparison of Efficacy Between a Newly Designed Covered Stent and Uncovered Stent for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute colorectal obstruction has been reported to occur in 7 - 29% of all colorectal malignancies, but emergent surgical decompression is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, self-expandable metal stents(SEMS) have been suggested as an alternative to surgery and effectively decompress the colonic obstruction and allow for bowel preparation and elective surgery. Theoretically, SEMSs are classified into uncovered stents and covered stents. Covered stents have the advantage of less frequent stent occlusion by tumor in-growth and the disadvantage of a high risk of stent migration, whereas uncovered stents are associated with less stent migration, although they appear to be more prone to tumor ingrowth. To overcome the drawbacks of conventional stents, a double-layered combination covered stent was developed. In the present study, the investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of the newly designed covered stent by comparing it with the uncovered stent in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Dec 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 27, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.7 years
December 10, 2015
March 25, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of stent patency between stent insertion and recurrence of obstructive symptoms
Time between stent insertion and recurrence of obstructive symptoms caused by tumor ingrowth, tumor overgrowth, or stent migration after stent placement
2 years after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of patients with technical success
2 years after the procedure
Number of patients with clinical success
2 years after the procedure
Number of patients with complications
2 years after the procedure
Study Arms (2)
covered stent
EXPERIMENTALnewly designed covered stent group
uncovered stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORcurrently used uncovered stent group
Interventions
Stent insertion was performed by experienced endoscopists under fluoroscopy and by using through-the-scope methods. After the obstructing tumor was identified by endoscopy, a guidewire was introduced through the stricture under endoscopic and fluoroscopic controls. Then, the self-expandable colorectal covered stent delivery catheter was advanced through the working channel of the endoscope over the guidewire until the stent was positioned across the stricture. Upon releasing the stent delivery catheter, stent deployment was initiated proximally and progressed distally. Simple abdominal radiography was performed during and after the procedures to confirm proper stent placement and expansion.
Stent insertion was performed by experienced endoscopists under fluoroscopy and by using through-the-scope methods. After the obstructing tumor was identified by endoscopy, a guidewire was introduced through the stricture under endoscopic and fluoroscopic controls. Then, the self-expandable colorectal stent delivery uncovered catheter was advanced through the working channel of the endoscope over the guidewire until the stent was positioned across the stricture. Upon releasing the stent delivery catheter, stent deployment was initiated proximally and progressed distally. Simple abdominal radiography was performed during and after the procedures to confirm proper stent placement and expansion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \~85-year-old patients with malignant colorectal obstruction either by primary CRC or extracolonic malignancy
- Patients with clinical obstructive symptoms confirmed by CT or colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with evidence of bowel perforation or peritonitis
- Cause of obstruction other than malignancy (bowel adhesion or benign stricture)
- Multiple stricture
- Lower rectal cancer obstruction (AV \<5cm)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Park SJ, Park Y, Lee HJ, Park JJ, Cheon JH, Kim WH, Kim TI. Newly designed flared-end covered versus uncovered self-expandable metallic stents for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction: a randomized, prospective study. Intest Res. 2025 Apr;23(2):202-212. doi: 10.5217/ir.2024.00135. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
PMID: 39988445DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2015
First Posted
December 29, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 27, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share