[18F]FLT-PET as a Predictive Imaging Biomaker of Treatment Responses to Regorafenib
3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography ([18F] FLT-PET) for the Prediction of Response to Regorafenib in the Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Progressed After All Standard Therapies
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Regorafenib is approved in the treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer patients who have been progressed after standard therapies, however, there has not been a predictive biomarker. The investigators designed this study to investigate whether \[18F\]FLT-PET might paly a role as a predictive imaging biomarker of treatment responses to regorafenib.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Jul 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 18, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 4, 2024
CompletedOctober 4, 2024
June 1, 2024
2.1 years
June 23, 2014
July 23, 2021
June 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of Early Response by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) on Day 21 of Regorafenib Compared With the Response Rate of CT RECIST at 8 Weeks
Response assessment using 18F-FDG PET/CT was based on the PERCIST 1.0. The peak SUV value corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) was measured from the single hottest tumour at each time point. For a tumour to be measurable at baseline, the SULpeak in the target lesion was greater than or equal to 1.5 times the mean SUL in the 3-cm-diameter spherical volume of interest plus two times its standard deviation of the liver. The percentage of change in SULpeak in the measurable target lesion was computed as follows: 100×(SULpeak day 21-SULpeak baseline)/SULpeak baseline. When a non-target lesion showed different responses from the measurable target lesion, we used the overall response considering both the target and non-target responses as previously described. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) by CT scans at 8 weeks.
Regorafenib was administered orally at a dose of 160 mg/day on days 1 to 21 following a 7-day break, with each cycle lasting 4 weeks. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal.
Assessment of Early Response by Using 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) on Day 21 of Regorafenib Compared With the Response Rate of CT RECIST at 8 Weeks
PET response of 18F-FLT was assessed using the SUVmax. The percentage of change of SUVmax in the target lesion was calculated as follows: 100 ×(SUVmax day 21-SUVmax baseline)/SUVmax baseline. The non responders on 18F-FLT PET/CT were defined as those with decreased SUVmax \<10.6% or new lesions on a follow-up scan. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) by CT scans at 8 weeks.
Regorafenib was administered orally at a dose of 160 mg/day on days 1 to 21 following a 7-day break, with each cycle lasting 4 weeks. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal.
Survival Outcomes According to 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET/CT Response on Day 21 of Regorafenib and RECIST on CT at 8 Weeks of Regorafenib
Regardless of the reason for discontinuation, all subjects will be followed for survival until death is documented, except for those who specifically withdraw consent to follow-up.
Study Arms (1)
Regorafenib and FLT-PET
EXPERIMENTALAfter checking the eligibility for the study entry, patients will be scheduled to perform \[18F\]FLT-PET scans before and on 21st day from the administration of regorafenib. Regorafenib will be administered 160 mg/day given orally on day 1 to days 21 following 7 days break, which consists of 4 weeks as 1 cycle. Treatment will be repeated every 4 weeks and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or the patient's refusal. Standard anatomical response evaluation will be performed every 8 weeks (without regard to the cycles or schedules of chemotherapy). Additional \[18F\]FDG-PET will be performed before treatment and at 8 weeks (just once at the point of first response evaluation).
Interventions
Regorafenib will be administered 160 mg/day given orally on day 1 to days 21 following 7 days break, which consists of 4 weeks as 1 cycle. Treatment will be repeated every 4 weeks and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or the patient's refusal.
\[18F\]FLT-PET scans before and on 21st day from the administration of regorafenib.
\[18F\]FDG-PET will be performed before treatment and at 21 days after treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or the rectum.
- Progressed after 3 active cytotoxic chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan during or within 6 months of their administrations with or without targeted agents (bevacizumab or cetuximab).
- Extrahepatic measurable lesion(s) by RECIST 1.1.
- Unresectable metastatic disease.
- Age over 20 years old.
- Have a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
- ECOG performance status of 1 or lower.
- Adequate organ functions.
- Be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study.
- Give written informed consent prior to study-specific screening procedures, with the understanding that the patient has the right to withdraw the study at any time, without prejudice.
- Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception since signing of the IC form until at least 8 weeks after the last study drug administration.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment of regorafenib.
- Liver-limited metastasis.
- Inability to perform \[18F\]FLT and \[18F\]FDG-PET imaging studies due to physical inability or claustrophobia.
- Concurrent or previous history of another primary cancer within 3 years prior to randomisation except for curatively treated cervical cancer in situ, non-melanomatous skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer (pTis and pT1) and curatively treated thyroid cancer of any stage. Concurrent, histologically confirmed, unresected thyroid cancer without distant metastasis could be allowed with the agreement of the chief principal investigator.
- Uncontrolled CNS metastases.
- Prior radiation therapy would be permitted, but non-radiated evaluable lesions should be present at study entry.
- Uncontrolled hypertension (\>150/90 mmHg) despite of optimal management; anti-hypertensive drugs for BP lowering before study entry would be permitted.
- Congestive heart failure ≥ New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2.
- Unstable angina, new-onset angina within 3 months, or history of myocardial infarction within 6 months before the study entry.
- Arterial or venous thromboembolism within 6 months.
- Serious concurrent infections or non-malignant illness.
- Liver cirrhosis ≥ Child-Pugh class B.
- Active hepatitis B or C, or chronic hepatitis B or C requiring treatment with antiviral therapy.
- Peripheral neuropathy of grade ≥ 2.
- Major surgery or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to study treatment.
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, Songpa, 138736, South Korea
Related Publications (27)
Van Cutsem E, Tabernero J, Lakomy R, Prenen H, Prausova J, Macarulla T, Ruff P, van Hazel GA, Moiseyenko V, Ferry D, McKendrick J, Polikoff J, Tellier A, Castan R, Allegra C. Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 1;30(28):3499-506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8201. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
PMID: 22949147BACKGROUNDBennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, Osterlund P, Greil R, Van Cutsem E, von Moos R, Vieitez JM, Bouche O, Borg C, Steffens CC, Alonso-Orduna V, Schlichting C, Reyes-Rivera I, Bendahmane B, Andre T, Kubicka S; ML18147 Study Investigators. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70477-1. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
PMID: 23168366BACKGROUNDHurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2335-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032691.
PMID: 15175435BACKGROUNDSaltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, Koski S, Lichinitser M, Yang TS, Rivera F, Couture F, Sirzen F, Cassidy J. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):2013-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9930.
PMID: 18421054BACKGROUNDKarapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385.
PMID: 18946061BACKGROUNDVan Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, D'Haens G, Pinter T, Lim R, Bodoky G, Roh JK, Folprecht G, Ruff P, Stroh C, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Nippgen J, Rougier P. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1408-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805019.
PMID: 19339720BACKGROUNDDouillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, Humblet Y, Bodoky G, Cunningham D, Jassem J, Rivera F, Kocakova I, Ruff P, Blasinska-Morawiec M, Smakal M, Canon JL, Rother M, Oliner KS, Wolf M, Gansert J. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4697-705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
PMID: 20921465BACKGROUNDPeeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, Hotko Y, Andre T, Chan E, Lordick F, Punt CJ, Strickland AH, Wilson G, Ciuleanu TE, Roman L, Van Cutsem E, Tzekova V, Collins S, Oliner KS, Rong A, Gansert J. Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4706-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6055. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
PMID: 20921462BACKGROUNDGrothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, Humblet Y, Bouche O, Mineur L, Barone C, Adenis A, Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Lenz HJ, Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Cihon F, Cupit L, Wagner A, Laurent D; CORRECT Study Group. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):303-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
PMID: 23177514BACKGROUNDDemetri GD, Reichardt P, Kang YK, Blay JY, Rutkowski P, Gelderblom H, Hohenberger P, Leahy M, von Mehren M, Joensuu H, Badalamenti G, Blackstein M, Le Cesne A, Schoffski P, Maki RG, Bauer S, Nguyen BB, Xu J, Nishida T, Chung J, Kappeler C, Kuss I, Laurent D, Casali PG; GRID study investigators. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):295-302. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61857-1. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
PMID: 23177515BACKGROUNDDi Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, De Dosso S, Mazzucchelli L, Frattini M, Siena S, Bardelli A. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5705-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0786. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
PMID: 19001320BACKGROUNDLievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, Cayre A, Le Corre D, Buc E, Ychou M, Bouche O, Landi B, Louvet C, Andre T, Bibeau F, Diebold MD, Rougier P, Ducreux M, Tomasic G, Emile JF, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 20;26(3):374-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.5906.
PMID: 18202412BACKGROUNDCousin S, Taieb S, Penel N. A paradigm shift in tumour response evaluation of targeted therapy: the assessment of novel drugs in exploratory clinical trials. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012 May;24(3):338-44. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283528b73.
PMID: 22418613BACKGROUNDMilano A, Perri F, Ciarmiello A, Caponigro F. Targeted-therapy and imaging response: a new paradigm for clinical evaluation? Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;6(3):259-65. doi: 10.2174/157488711796575540.
PMID: 21682675BACKGROUNDDesar IM, van Herpen CM, van Laarhoven HW, Barentsz JO, Oyen WJ, van der Graaf WT. Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Jun;35(4):309-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PMID: 19136215BACKGROUNDChen W, Delaloye S, Silverman DH, Geist C, Czernin J, Sayre J, Satyamurthy N, Pope W, Lai A, Phelps ME, Cloughesy T. Predicting treatment response of malignant gliomas to bevacizumab and irinotecan by imaging proliferation with [18F] fluorothymidine positron emission tomography: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 20;25(30):4714-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5825.
PMID: 17947718BACKGROUNDHerrmann K, Wieder HA, Buck AK, Schoffel M, Krause BJ, Fend F, Schuster T, Meyer zum Buschenfelde C, Wester HJ, Duyster J, Peschel C, Schwaiger M, Dechow T. Early response assessment using 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 15;13(12):3552-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3025.
PMID: 17575218BACKGROUNDKahraman D, Scheffler M, Zander T, Nogova L, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R, Neumaier B, Ullrich RT, Holstein A, Dietlein M, Wolf J, Kobe C. Quantitative analysis of response to treatment with erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using 18F-FDG and 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET. J Nucl Med. 2011 Dec;52(12):1871-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.094458. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
PMID: 22065872BACKGROUNDKim SJ, Lee JS, Im KC, Kim SY, Park SA, Lee SJ, Oh SJ, Lee DS, Moon DH. Kinetic modeling of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine for quantitative cell proliferation imaging in subcutaneous tumor models in mice. J Nucl Med. 2008 Dec;49(12):2057-66. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053215. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
PMID: 18997037BACKGROUNDMcKinley ET, Smith RA, Zhao P, Fu A, Saleh SA, Uddin MI, Washington MK, Coffey RJ, Manning HC. 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET predicts response to (V600E)BRAF-targeted therapy in preclinical models of colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2013 Mar;54(3):424-30. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.108456. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PMID: 23341544BACKGROUNDNakajo M, Nakajo M, Kajiya Y, Jinguji M, Nishimata N, Shimaoka S, Nihara T, Aridome K, Tanaka S, Fukukura Y, Tani A, Koriyama C. Diagnostic performance of (1)(8)F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with (1)(8)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Aug;40(8):1223-32. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2424-9. Epub 2013 May 8.
PMID: 23653240BACKGROUNDSohn HJ, Yang YJ, Ryu JS, Oh SJ, Im KC, Moon DH, Lee DH, Suh C, Lee JS, Kim SW. [18F]Fluorothymidine positron emission tomography before and 7 days after gefitinib treatment predicts response in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Nov 15;14(22):7423-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0312.
PMID: 19010859BACKGROUNDHong YS, Kim HO, Kim KP, Lee JL, Kim HJ, Lee SJ, Lee SJ, Oh SJ, Kim JS, Ryu JS, Moon DH, Kim TW. 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET for the early prediction of response to leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2013 Aug;54(8):1209-16. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.117010. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
PMID: 23804324BACKGROUNDMross K, Frost A, Steinbild S, Hedbom S, Buchert M, Fasol U, Unger C, Kratzschmar J, Heinig R, Boix O, Christensen O. A phase I dose-escalation study of regorafenib (BAY 73-4506), an inhibitor of oncogenic, angiogenic, and stromal kinases, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 May 1;18(9):2658-67. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1900. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
PMID: 22421192BACKGROUNDStrumberg D, Scheulen ME, Schultheis B, Richly H, Frost A, Buchert M, Christensen O, Jeffers M, Heinig R, Boix O, Mross K. Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I study. Br J Cancer. 2012 May 22;106(11):1722-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.153. Epub 2012 May 8.
PMID: 22568966BACKGROUNDWilhelm SM, Dumas J, Adnane L, Lynch M, Carter CA, Schutz G, Thierauch KH, Zopf D. Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int J Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;129(1):245-55. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25864. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
PMID: 21170960BACKGROUNDGeorge S, Wang Q, Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Zhu M, Butrynski JE, Morgan JA, Wagner AJ, Choy E, Tap WD, Yap JT, Van den Abbeele AD, Manola JB, Solomon SM, Fletcher JA, von Mehren M, Demetri GD. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GI stromal tumor after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;30(19):2401-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9394. Epub 2012 May 21.
PMID: 22614970BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Yong Sang Hong, M.D., Ph.D.
- Organization
- Asan Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yong Sang Hong, M.D., Ph.D.
Asan Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2014
First Posted
June 26, 2014
Study Start
July 18, 2014
Primary Completion
August 10, 2016
Study Completion
April 30, 2019
Last Updated
October 4, 2024
Results First Posted
October 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06