The Benefits of Deep Neuromuscular Block and Sugammadex in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pneumoperitoneum, the use of carbon dioxide, presents some disadvantages, including a risk of hypercarbia and respiratory acidosis during surgery in the respiratory system, and of an increased mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance due to sympathetic excitation in the cardiovascular system. 10\~15 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure is required in order to achieve a pneumoperitoneum, and increased abdominal pressure following a pneumoperitoneum causes hemodynamic changes leading to a reduced cardiac function by increasing the left ventricular end systolic wall stress and the right and left ventricular filling pressure, while decreasing the stroke volume and cardiac index. The author compared the intra-abdominal pressure necessary to achieve a pneumoperitoneum under deep muscle relaxation and medium muscle relaxation in ten patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer as part of preliminary research. The results showed that deep muscle relaxation, compared to medium muscle relaxation, was able to lower the intra-abdominal pressure by an average of 5.6 mmHg (13.2 ± 0.8 vs 7.6 ± 1.1) and the inspiratory pressure by an average of 8. Above all, even after lowering the intra-abdominal pressure with deep muscle relaxation, the surgeon was able to maintain a view almost identical to the one afforded by medium muscle relaxation. However, up until now, no reports have clearly indicated the change in pneumoperitoneum pressure, the patient's hemodynamic change, post-operative recovery, and surgical prognosis depending on the depth of muscle relaxation.Against this background, this study aims to identify the degree to which intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery can be reduced by deep muscle relaxation, and the corresponding advantages this method presents in terms of physiological changes such as hemodynamic and respiratory system changes. In addition, the study intends to examine the difference between deep muscle relaxation and medium muscle relaxation in terms of surgical prognosis, including their effects on post-operative pain and on the patient's recovery of intestinal mobility.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Aug 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 19, 2015
October 1, 2015
1.1 years
August 26, 2014
October 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
intra-abdominal pressure
The difference of intra-abdominal pressure during peumoperitoneum between deep neuromuscular block and moderate neuromuscular block to identify the degree to which deep muscle relaxation can reduce intra-abdominal pressure while maintaining the surgeon's view in a laparoscopic colorectal surgery or laparoscopic rectal surgery, as well as examine the simultaneous hemodynamic changes and changes in the respiratory system.
5 minuits after pneumoperitoneum
Study Arms (2)
Deep neuromuscular relaxation
EXPERIMENTALModerate neuromuscular relaxation
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Deep neuromuscular block and moderate neuromuscular block with Esmerone and reversal with bridion
Moderate neuromuscular block and moderate neuromuscular block with Esmerone and reversal with bridion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 19 to 80 scheduled to undergo laparoscopic colorectal or rectal surgery below the ASA class 3
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with neuromuscular disease/patients with a personal history or family history of malignant hyperthermia/patients with a serious heart, kidney (GFR \< 60) or liver condition (ALT/AST \> 100)/ patients who have had colorectal or rectal surgery/obese patients (BMI ≥35)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Health System, Yonsei Cancer Center
Seoul, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2014
First Posted
October 16, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 19, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10