NCT02511678

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy of cryoablation for palliation of painful metastases in participants with metastatic lesions involving bone who have failed, are not candidates for, or are not experiencing adequate pain relief from current pain therapies (for example, radiation, analgesics).

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
73

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
2 countries

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 27, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2016

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 12, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 12, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 4, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

July 27, 2015

Results QC Date

August 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in Worst Pain Scores as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) at Week 8

    The BPI-SF is a validated instrument used widely in clinical research to assess cancer pain. Assessments were of self-reported worst pain scores in the last 24 hours in the target lesion treated with study cryoablation on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) using the BPI-SF. Improvement in self-reported pain scores is defined by ≥2-point reduction in worst pain. A mean difference of a 2-point reduction is considered clinically significant, that is improvement. Baseline data and change from Baseline data at Week 8 is presented.

    Baseline, Week 8

Other Outcomes (9)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Respond to the Cryoablation Therapy

    Baseline and Week 8

  • Change From Baseline in QoL as Indicated by the Overall Average BPI-SF Interference Score at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

    Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24

  • Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24

  • +6 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Cryoablation

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will have one cryoablation procedure on one painful metastatic lesion involving bone using a Galil Medical cryoablation system and needles within 14 days of screening. In the case of participants with multiple metastatic lesions involving bone, the most painful lesion is to be selected for cryoablation. If treatment could not be completed within 14 days of screening, the participant will be re-screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure will be identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and will be at the discretion of the Investigators.

Device: Cryoablation

Interventions

The application of repeated freeze and thaw cycles to the identified tissues.

Also known as: Cryotherapy, Cryosurgery, Visual-ICE™ Cryoablation System, IceSeed® Cryoablation Needle, IceSphere™ Cryoablation Needle, IceRod® PLUS Cryoablation Needle, IceEDGE® 2.4 Cryoablation Needle, IceFORCE® 2.1 Cryoablation Needle, IcePearl® 2.1 Cryoablation Needle
Cryoablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older
  • Metastatic disease involving bone with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy; or Metastatic disease involving bone previously confirmed on imaging (for example, computed tomography \[CT\] or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) with known (biopsied) primary disease (primary bone cancer is excluded)
  • Current analgesic therapies have failed, the participant is not a candidate for, or the participant is not experiencing adequate pain relief from current pain therapies (for example, radiation, analgesics)
  • The 'worst pain' in the last 24 hours must be reported to be 4 or above on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as participant can imagine)
  • Pain must be from one painful metastatic lesion involving the bone that is amenable to cryoablation with CT (additional less painful metastatic sites may be present)
  • Cryoablation should be performed within 14 days of screening visit
  • If taking hormonal therapy, use should be stable (no changes within 4 weeks prior to the cryoablation procedure)
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥60
  • Life expectancy ≥3 months
  • No debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment and follow-up
  • Known coagulopathy or bleeding disorders are controlled

You may not qualify if:

  • Primary cancer is leukemia, lymphoma, or myeloma
  • Tumor involves a weight-bearing long bone of the lower extremity with the tumor causing \>50% loss of cortical bone
  • Has undergone prior surgery at the tumor site or the index tumor has undergone previous surgery or ablation treatment
  • Prior radiation therapy of the index tumor \<3 weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Index tumor causing clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression/effacement
  • Anticipated treatment of the index tumor that would require iceball formation within 0.5 centimeters (cm) of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve structure, or large abdominal vessel (possibly achieved with additional maneuvers such as hydrodissection)
  • Index tumor involves the skull
  • Currently pregnant, nursing, or wishing to become pregnant during the study
  • Serious medical illness, including any of the following: uncontrolled congestive heart failure, uncontrolled angina, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular event within 6 months prior to the screening visit
  • Concurrent participation in other studies that could affect the primary endpoint

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Crittenton Hospital

Rochester, Michigan, 48307, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Washington University in St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States

Location

Institut Bergonié

Bordeaux, 33000, France

Location

Centre Léon Bérard

Lyon, 69373, France

Location

University Hospital of Strasbourg

Strasbourg, 67091, France

Location

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, 94805, France

Location

Related Publications (39)

  • Goldfarb HA. Nd:YAG laser laparoscopic coagulation of symptomatic myomas. J Reprod Med. 1992 Jul;37(7):636-8.

    PMID: 1387912BACKGROUND
  • Phillips DR, Milim SJ, Nathanson HG, Haselkorn JS. Experience with laparoscopic leiomyoma coagulation and concomitant operative hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Aug;4(4):425-33. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80034-9.

    PMID: 9224575BACKGROUND
  • Goldfarb HA. Laparoscopic coagulation of myoma (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Dec;22(4):807-19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8786884BACKGROUND
  • COOPER IS, LEE AS. Cryostatic congelation: a system for producing a limited, controlled region of cooling or freezing of biologic tissues. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1961 Sep;133:259-63. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13881139BACKGROUND
  • Saliken JC, Donnelly BJ, Rewcastle JC. The evolution and state of modern technology for prostate cryosurgery. Urology. 2002 Aug;60(2 Suppl 1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01681-3.

    PMID: 12206845BACKGROUND
  • Rewcastle JC, Sandison GA, Saliken JC, Donnelly BJ, McKinnon JG. Considerations during clinical operation of two commercially available cryomachines. J Surg Oncol. 1999 Jun;71(2):106-11. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199906)71:23.0.co;2-z.

    PMID: 10389867BACKGROUND
  • Rewcastle JC, Hahn LJ, Saliken JC, McKinnon JG. Use of a moratorium to achieve consistent liquid nitrogen cryoprobe performance. J Surg Oncol. 1997 Oct;66(2):110-3. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199710)66:23.0.co;2-g.

    PMID: 9354166BACKGROUND
  • Gage AA. Current progress in cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1988 Oct;25(5):483-6. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(88)90056-9.

    PMID: 3197439BACKGROUND
  • Gage AA, Guest K, Montes M, Caruana JA, Whalen DA Jr. Effect of varying freezing and thawing rates in experimental cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1985 Apr;22(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(85)90172-5.

    PMID: 3979086BACKGROUND
  • Gage AA. Progress in cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1992 Apr;29(2):300-4. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(92)90030-6.

    PMID: 1582235BACKGROUND
  • Homasson JP, Thiery JP, Angebault M, Ovtracht L, Maiwand O. The operation and efficacy of cryosurgical, nitrous oxide-driven cryoprobe. I. Cryoprobe physical characteristics: their effects on cell cryodestruction. Cryobiology. 1994 Jun;31(3):290-304. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1994.1035.

    PMID: 8050273BACKGROUND
  • Hamilton A, Hu J. An electronic cryoprobe for cryosurgery using heat pipes and thermoelectric coolers: a preliminary report. J Med Eng Technol. 1993 May-Jun;17(3):104-9. doi: 10.3109/03091909309016215.

    PMID: 8263903BACKGROUND
  • Rabin Y, Julian TB, Wolmark N. A compact cryosurgical apparatus for minimally invasive procedures. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1997 May-Jun;31(3):251-8.

    PMID: 9181244BACKGROUND
  • Rabin Y, Coleman R, Mordohovich D, Ber R, Shitzer A. A new cryosurgical device for controlled freezing. Cryobiology. 1996 Feb;33(1):93-105. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1996.0010.

    PMID: 8812089BACKGROUND
  • Rand RW, Rand RP, Eggerding FA, Field M, Denbesten L, King W, Camici S. Cryolumpectomy for breast cancer: an experimental study. Cryobiology. 1985 Aug;22(4):307-18. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(85)90178-6.

    PMID: 2992882BACKGROUND
  • Miller RH, Mazur P. Survival of frozen-thawed human red cells as a function of cooling and warming velocities. Cryobiology. 1976 Aug;13(4):404-14. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(76)90096-1.

    PMID: 971585BACKGROUND
  • Gage AA, Baust JM, Baust JG. Experimental cryosurgery investigations in vivo. Cryobiology. 2009 Dec;59(3):229-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 13.

    PMID: 19833119BACKGROUND
  • McTaggart RA, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of lung tumors. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Jun;10(2):102-13. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.09.004.

    PMID: 18070688BACKGROUND
  • Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW. Image-guided palliation of painful metastases using percutaneous ablation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Jun;10(2):120-31. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.09.003.

    PMID: 18070690BACKGROUND
  • McQuay HJ, Collins SL, Carroll D, Moore RA. Radiotherapy for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001793.

    PMID: 10796822BACKGROUND
  • Callstrom MR, Atwell TD, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Welch TJ, Maus TP, Wong GY, Brown KJ. Painful metastases involving bone: percutaneous image-guided cryoablation--prospective trial interim analysis. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):572-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051247.

    PMID: 17057075BACKGROUND
  • Coleman RE. Management of bone metastases. Oncologist. 2000;5(6):463-70. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-6-463.

    PMID: 11110597BACKGROUND
  • Goetz MP, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Welch TJ, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Petersen IA, Beres RA, Regge D, Capanna R, Saker MB, Gronemeyer DH, Gevargez A, Ahrar K, Choti MA, de Baere TJ, Rubin J. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):300-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.097.

    PMID: 14722039BACKGROUND
  • Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Lewis BD, Welch TJ, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Lee RA, Reading CC, Petersen IA, Pickett DD. Painful metastases involving bone: feasibility of percutaneous CT- and US-guided radio-frequency ablation. Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):87-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011613.

    PMID: 12091666BACKGROUND
  • Belfiore G, Tedeschi E, Ronza FM, Belfiore MP, Della Volpe T, Zeppetella G, Rotondo A. Radiofrequency ablation of bone metastases induces long-lasting palliation in patients with untreatable cancer. Singapore Med J. 2008 Jul;49(7):565-70.

    PMID: 18695866BACKGROUND
  • Hurwitz MD, Ghanouni P, Kanaev SV, Iozeffi D, Gianfelice D, Fennessy FM, Kuten A, Meyer JE, LeBlang SD, Roberts A, Choi J, Larner JM, Napoli A, Turkevich VG, Inbar Y, Tempany CM, Pfeffer RM. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for patients with painful bone metastases: phase III trial results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 23;106(5):dju082. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju082.

    PMID: 24760791BACKGROUND
  • Simon CJ, Dupuy DE. Percutaneous minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of bone tumors: thermal ablation. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2006 Jun;10(2):137-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939031. Epub 2006 Apr 5.

    PMID: 16598666BACKGROUND
  • Ullrick SR, Hebert JJ, Davis KW. Cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;37(1):39-48. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.05.001.

    PMID: 18054665BACKGROUND
  • Maiwand MO. The role of cryosurgery in palliation of tracheo-bronchial carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Jun;15(6):764-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00121-9.

    PMID: 10431856BACKGROUND
  • Maiwand MO, Homasson JP. Cryotherapy for tracheobronchial disorders. Clin Chest Med. 1995 Sep;16(3):427-43.

    PMID: 8521698BACKGROUND
  • Sanderson DR, Neel HB 3rd, Fontana RS. Bronchoscopic cryotherapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981 Jul-Aug;90(4 Pt 1):354-8. doi: 10.1177/000348948109000414.

    PMID: 6791555BACKGROUND
  • Cozzi PJ, Lynch WJ, Collins S, Vonthethoff L, Morris DL. Renal cryotherapy in a sheep model; a feasibility study. J Urol. 1997 Feb;157(2):710-2.

    PMID: 8996403BACKGROUND
  • Gage AA, Fazekas G, Riley EE Jr. Freezing injury to large blood vessels in dogs. With comments on the effect of experimental freezing of bile ducts. Surgery. 1967 May;61(5):748-54. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6024400BACKGROUND
  • Gage AM, Montes M, Gage AA. Freezing the canine thoracic aorta in situ. J Surg Res. 1979 Nov;27(5):331-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(79)90149-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 513700BACKGROUND
  • Ladd AP, Rescorla FJ, Baust JG, Callahan M, Davis M, Grosfeld JL. Cryosurgical effects on growing vessels. Am Surg. 1999 Jul;65(7):677-82.

    PMID: 10399979BACKGROUND
  • Mandeville AF, McCabe BF. Some observations on the cryobiology of blood vessels. Laryngoscope. 1967 Aug;77(8):1328-50. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196708000-00009. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6034857BACKGROUND
  • Callstrom MR, Dupuy DE, Solomon SB, Beres RA, Littrup PJ, Davis KW, Paz-Fumagalli R, Hoffman C, Atwell TD, Charboneau JW, Schmit GD, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Brown KJ, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA. Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of painful metastases involving bone: multicenter trial. Cancer. 2013 Mar 1;119(5):1033-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27793. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

    PMID: 23065947BACKGROUND
  • Cleeland CS. The measurement of pain from metastatic bone disease: capturing the patient's experience. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 2):6236s-6242s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0988.

    PMID: 17062707BACKGROUND
  • Jennings JW, Prologo JD, Garnon J, Gangi A, Buy X, Palussiere J, Kurup AN, Callstrom M, Genshaft S, Abtin F, Huang AJ, Iannuccilli J, Pilleul F, Mastier C, Littrup PJ, de Baere T, Deschamps F. Cryoablation for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases: The MOTION Multicenter Study. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Feb 12;3(2):e200101. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021200101. eCollection 2021 Mar.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainNeoplasm Metastasis

Interventions

CryosurgeryCryotherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeoplastic ProcessesNeoplasmsPathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ablation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, OperativeTherapeutics

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sr. Clinical Trial Specialist
Organization
Galil Medical, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Boston Scientific

Study Officials

  • Jack Jennings, MD

    Washington University Saint Louis

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2015

First Posted

July 30, 2015

Study Start

February 15, 2016

Primary Completion

March 12, 2018

Study Completion

March 12, 2018

Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Results First Posted

September 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations