Multicenter Study of Cryoablation for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases
MOTION
1 other identifier
interventional
73
2 countries
11
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy of cryoablation for palliation of painful metastases in participants with metastatic lesions involving bone who have failed, are not candidates for, or are not experiencing adequate pain relief from current pain therapies (for example, radiation, analgesics).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Feb 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable pain
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 12, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 4, 2019
CompletedJuly 19, 2021
July 1, 2021
2.1 years
July 27, 2015
August 7, 2019
July 15, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Worst Pain Scores as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) at Week 8
The BPI-SF is a validated instrument used widely in clinical research to assess cancer pain. Assessments were of self-reported worst pain scores in the last 24 hours in the target lesion treated with study cryoablation on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) using the BPI-SF. Improvement in self-reported pain scores is defined by ≥2-point reduction in worst pain. A mean difference of a 2-point reduction is considered clinically significant, that is improvement. Baseline data and change from Baseline data at Week 8 is presented.
Baseline, Week 8
Other Outcomes (9)
Percentage of Participants Who Respond to the Cryoablation Therapy
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline in QoL as Indicated by the Overall Average BPI-SF Interference Score at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Cryoablation
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will have one cryoablation procedure on one painful metastatic lesion involving bone using a Galil Medical cryoablation system and needles within 14 days of screening. In the case of participants with multiple metastatic lesions involving bone, the most painful lesion is to be selected for cryoablation. If treatment could not be completed within 14 days of screening, the participant will be re-screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure will be identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and will be at the discretion of the Investigators.
Interventions
The application of repeated freeze and thaw cycles to the identified tissues.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Metastatic disease involving bone with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy; or Metastatic disease involving bone previously confirmed on imaging (for example, computed tomography \[CT\] or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) with known (biopsied) primary disease (primary bone cancer is excluded)
- Current analgesic therapies have failed, the participant is not a candidate for, or the participant is not experiencing adequate pain relief from current pain therapies (for example, radiation, analgesics)
- The 'worst pain' in the last 24 hours must be reported to be 4 or above on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as participant can imagine)
- Pain must be from one painful metastatic lesion involving the bone that is amenable to cryoablation with CT (additional less painful metastatic sites may be present)
- Cryoablation should be performed within 14 days of screening visit
- If taking hormonal therapy, use should be stable (no changes within 4 weeks prior to the cryoablation procedure)
- Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥60
- Life expectancy ≥3 months
- No debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment and follow-up
- Known coagulopathy or bleeding disorders are controlled
You may not qualify if:
- Primary cancer is leukemia, lymphoma, or myeloma
- Tumor involves a weight-bearing long bone of the lower extremity with the tumor causing \>50% loss of cortical bone
- Has undergone prior surgery at the tumor site or the index tumor has undergone previous surgery or ablation treatment
- Prior radiation therapy of the index tumor \<3 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Index tumor causing clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression/effacement
- Anticipated treatment of the index tumor that would require iceball formation within 0.5 centimeters (cm) of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve structure, or large abdominal vessel (possibly achieved with additional maneuvers such as hydrodissection)
- Index tumor involves the skull
- Currently pregnant, nursing, or wishing to become pregnant during the study
- Serious medical illness, including any of the following: uncontrolled congestive heart failure, uncontrolled angina, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular event within 6 months prior to the screening visit
- Concurrent participation in other studies that could affect the primary endpoint
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Crittenton Hospital
Rochester, Michigan, 48307, United States
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69373, France
University Hospital of Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091, France
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94805, France
Related Publications (39)
Goldfarb HA. Nd:YAG laser laparoscopic coagulation of symptomatic myomas. J Reprod Med. 1992 Jul;37(7):636-8.
PMID: 1387912BACKGROUNDPhillips DR, Milim SJ, Nathanson HG, Haselkorn JS. Experience with laparoscopic leiomyoma coagulation and concomitant operative hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Aug;4(4):425-33. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80034-9.
PMID: 9224575BACKGROUNDGoldfarb HA. Laparoscopic coagulation of myoma (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Dec;22(4):807-19. No abstract available.
PMID: 8786884BACKGROUNDCOOPER IS, LEE AS. Cryostatic congelation: a system for producing a limited, controlled region of cooling or freezing of biologic tissues. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1961 Sep;133:259-63. No abstract available.
PMID: 13881139BACKGROUNDSaliken JC, Donnelly BJ, Rewcastle JC. The evolution and state of modern technology for prostate cryosurgery. Urology. 2002 Aug;60(2 Suppl 1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01681-3.
PMID: 12206845BACKGROUNDRewcastle JC, Sandison GA, Saliken JC, Donnelly BJ, McKinnon JG. Considerations during clinical operation of two commercially available cryomachines. J Surg Oncol. 1999 Jun;71(2):106-11. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199906)71:23.0.co;2-z.
PMID: 10389867BACKGROUNDRewcastle JC, Hahn LJ, Saliken JC, McKinnon JG. Use of a moratorium to achieve consistent liquid nitrogen cryoprobe performance. J Surg Oncol. 1997 Oct;66(2):110-3. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199710)66:23.0.co;2-g.
PMID: 9354166BACKGROUNDGage AA. Current progress in cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1988 Oct;25(5):483-6. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(88)90056-9.
PMID: 3197439BACKGROUNDGage AA, Guest K, Montes M, Caruana JA, Whalen DA Jr. Effect of varying freezing and thawing rates in experimental cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1985 Apr;22(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(85)90172-5.
PMID: 3979086BACKGROUNDGage AA. Progress in cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1992 Apr;29(2):300-4. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(92)90030-6.
PMID: 1582235BACKGROUNDHomasson JP, Thiery JP, Angebault M, Ovtracht L, Maiwand O. The operation and efficacy of cryosurgical, nitrous oxide-driven cryoprobe. I. Cryoprobe physical characteristics: their effects on cell cryodestruction. Cryobiology. 1994 Jun;31(3):290-304. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1994.1035.
PMID: 8050273BACKGROUNDHamilton A, Hu J. An electronic cryoprobe for cryosurgery using heat pipes and thermoelectric coolers: a preliminary report. J Med Eng Technol. 1993 May-Jun;17(3):104-9. doi: 10.3109/03091909309016215.
PMID: 8263903BACKGROUNDRabin Y, Julian TB, Wolmark N. A compact cryosurgical apparatus for minimally invasive procedures. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1997 May-Jun;31(3):251-8.
PMID: 9181244BACKGROUNDRabin Y, Coleman R, Mordohovich D, Ber R, Shitzer A. A new cryosurgical device for controlled freezing. Cryobiology. 1996 Feb;33(1):93-105. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1996.0010.
PMID: 8812089BACKGROUNDRand RW, Rand RP, Eggerding FA, Field M, Denbesten L, King W, Camici S. Cryolumpectomy for breast cancer: an experimental study. Cryobiology. 1985 Aug;22(4):307-18. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(85)90178-6.
PMID: 2992882BACKGROUNDMiller RH, Mazur P. Survival of frozen-thawed human red cells as a function of cooling and warming velocities. Cryobiology. 1976 Aug;13(4):404-14. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(76)90096-1.
PMID: 971585BACKGROUNDGage AA, Baust JM, Baust JG. Experimental cryosurgery investigations in vivo. Cryobiology. 2009 Dec;59(3):229-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
PMID: 19833119BACKGROUNDMcTaggart RA, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of lung tumors. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Jun;10(2):102-13. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.09.004.
PMID: 18070688BACKGROUNDCallstrom MR, Charboneau JW. Image-guided palliation of painful metastases using percutaneous ablation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Jun;10(2):120-31. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.09.003.
PMID: 18070690BACKGROUNDMcQuay HJ, Collins SL, Carroll D, Moore RA. Radiotherapy for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001793.
PMID: 10796822BACKGROUNDCallstrom MR, Atwell TD, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Welch TJ, Maus TP, Wong GY, Brown KJ. Painful metastases involving bone: percutaneous image-guided cryoablation--prospective trial interim analysis. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):572-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051247.
PMID: 17057075BACKGROUNDColeman RE. Management of bone metastases. Oncologist. 2000;5(6):463-70. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-6-463.
PMID: 11110597BACKGROUNDGoetz MP, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Welch TJ, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Petersen IA, Beres RA, Regge D, Capanna R, Saker MB, Gronemeyer DH, Gevargez A, Ahrar K, Choti MA, de Baere TJ, Rubin J. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):300-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.097.
PMID: 14722039BACKGROUNDCallstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Lewis BD, Welch TJ, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Lee RA, Reading CC, Petersen IA, Pickett DD. Painful metastases involving bone: feasibility of percutaneous CT- and US-guided radio-frequency ablation. Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):87-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011613.
PMID: 12091666BACKGROUNDBelfiore G, Tedeschi E, Ronza FM, Belfiore MP, Della Volpe T, Zeppetella G, Rotondo A. Radiofrequency ablation of bone metastases induces long-lasting palliation in patients with untreatable cancer. Singapore Med J. 2008 Jul;49(7):565-70.
PMID: 18695866BACKGROUNDHurwitz MD, Ghanouni P, Kanaev SV, Iozeffi D, Gianfelice D, Fennessy FM, Kuten A, Meyer JE, LeBlang SD, Roberts A, Choi J, Larner JM, Napoli A, Turkevich VG, Inbar Y, Tempany CM, Pfeffer RM. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for patients with painful bone metastases: phase III trial results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 23;106(5):dju082. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju082.
PMID: 24760791BACKGROUNDSimon CJ, Dupuy DE. Percutaneous minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of bone tumors: thermal ablation. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2006 Jun;10(2):137-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939031. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
PMID: 16598666BACKGROUNDUllrick SR, Hebert JJ, Davis KW. Cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;37(1):39-48. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.05.001.
PMID: 18054665BACKGROUNDMaiwand MO. The role of cryosurgery in palliation of tracheo-bronchial carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Jun;15(6):764-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00121-9.
PMID: 10431856BACKGROUNDMaiwand MO, Homasson JP. Cryotherapy for tracheobronchial disorders. Clin Chest Med. 1995 Sep;16(3):427-43.
PMID: 8521698BACKGROUNDSanderson DR, Neel HB 3rd, Fontana RS. Bronchoscopic cryotherapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981 Jul-Aug;90(4 Pt 1):354-8. doi: 10.1177/000348948109000414.
PMID: 6791555BACKGROUNDCozzi PJ, Lynch WJ, Collins S, Vonthethoff L, Morris DL. Renal cryotherapy in a sheep model; a feasibility study. J Urol. 1997 Feb;157(2):710-2.
PMID: 8996403BACKGROUNDGage AA, Fazekas G, Riley EE Jr. Freezing injury to large blood vessels in dogs. With comments on the effect of experimental freezing of bile ducts. Surgery. 1967 May;61(5):748-54. No abstract available.
PMID: 6024400BACKGROUNDGage AM, Montes M, Gage AA. Freezing the canine thoracic aorta in situ. J Surg Res. 1979 Nov;27(5):331-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(79)90149-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 513700BACKGROUNDLadd AP, Rescorla FJ, Baust JG, Callahan M, Davis M, Grosfeld JL. Cryosurgical effects on growing vessels. Am Surg. 1999 Jul;65(7):677-82.
PMID: 10399979BACKGROUNDMandeville AF, McCabe BF. Some observations on the cryobiology of blood vessels. Laryngoscope. 1967 Aug;77(8):1328-50. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196708000-00009. No abstract available.
PMID: 6034857BACKGROUNDCallstrom MR, Dupuy DE, Solomon SB, Beres RA, Littrup PJ, Davis KW, Paz-Fumagalli R, Hoffman C, Atwell TD, Charboneau JW, Schmit GD, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Brown KJ, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA. Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of painful metastases involving bone: multicenter trial. Cancer. 2013 Mar 1;119(5):1033-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27793. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
PMID: 23065947BACKGROUNDCleeland CS. The measurement of pain from metastatic bone disease: capturing the patient's experience. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 2):6236s-6242s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0988.
PMID: 17062707BACKGROUNDJennings JW, Prologo JD, Garnon J, Gangi A, Buy X, Palussiere J, Kurup AN, Callstrom M, Genshaft S, Abtin F, Huang AJ, Iannuccilli J, Pilleul F, Mastier C, Littrup PJ, de Baere T, Deschamps F. Cryoablation for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases: The MOTION Multicenter Study. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Feb 12;3(2):e200101. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021200101. eCollection 2021 Mar.
PMID: 33817650DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. Clinical Trial Specialist
- Organization
- Galil Medical, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Boston Scientific
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jack Jennings, MD
Washington University Saint Louis
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2015
First Posted
July 30, 2015
Study Start
February 15, 2016
Primary Completion
March 12, 2018
Study Completion
March 12, 2018
Last Updated
July 19, 2021
Results First Posted
September 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share