Safety and Efficacy of Cryoablation for Metastatic Lung Tumors
ECLIPSE
Evaluating Cryoablation of Metastatic Lung/Pleura Tumors in Patients - Safety and Efficacy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
ECLIPSE will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy used to treat tumors less than or equal to 3.5 centimeters (cm) in participants with pulmonary metastatic disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 4, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 19, 2021
July 1, 2021
6.7 years
March 1, 2011
September 6, 2019
July 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60
Local tumor control was achieved if either the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or \<25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used.
Baseline and Month 60
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation
Up to Month 60
Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation
Baseline (0 days), Week 1 (7 days), and Months 3 (90 days), 6 (180 days), 12 (365 days), 24 (730 days), 36 (1095 days), 48 (1460 days), and 60 (1825 days)
Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Cryoablation
OTHERParticipants will undergo a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure will be identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and will be at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung can be treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) can be treated during the study.
Interventions
Application of extremely cold temperatures to the identified tumor(s).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant must be at least 18 years old.
- Participant has signed a written informed consent.
- Participant presents with Stage 4 pulmonary metastatic disease with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy or confirmed on imaging with known primary disease.
- Participant has up to 3 local metastases unilaterally targeted by cryoablation. Maximum of 5 total pulmonary tumors bilaterally.
- Targeted tumor(s) defined as intra pulmonary or pleural with a maximum size of 3.5 cm.
- The target tumor is determined (by CT/MRI) to be in a location where cryoablation is technically achievable based on the proximity of adjacent organs and structures.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2.
- Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥60.
- Platelet count \>50,000/cubed millimeters (mm\^3) within 60 days prior to study treatment.
- International normalized ratio (INR) less than 1.5 within 60 days prior to study treatment.
- Participant has a life expectancy of \>3 months.
- Participant is clinically suitable for cryoablation procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Participant's primary cancer is lung cancer.
- Participant is unable to lie flat or has respiratory distress at rest.
- Participant has uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
- Participant has had chemotherapy with neutropenia to levels as confirmed by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 1000 that produce increase risk for the cryoablation procedure.
- Participant has a history of an allergic reaction to iodine injections or to shellfish.
- Participant has evidence of active systemic, pulmonary, or pericardial infection.
- Participant has a debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment or follow up.
- Participant is currently participating in other experimental studies that could affect the primary endpoint.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, Cedex, 94805, France
Related Publications (7)
Gillams A. Lung tumour ablation - where are we now? Cancer Imaging. 2008 Apr 22;8(1):116-7. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0015.
PMID: 18442957BACKGROUNDAhmed A, Littrup P. Percutaneous cryotherapy of the thorax: safety considerations for complex cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1703-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1068. No abstract available.
PMID: 16714662BACKGROUNDAsimakopoulos G, Beeson J, Evans J, Maiwand MO. Cryosurgery for malignant endobronchial tumors: analysis of outcome. Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2007-14. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2007.
PMID: 15947313BACKGROUNDKawamura M, Izumi Y, Tsukada N, Asakura K, Sugiura H, Yashiro H, Nakano K, Nakatsuka S, Kuribayashi S, Kobayashi K. Percutaneous cryoablation of small pulmonary malignant tumors under computed tomographic guidance with local anesthesia for nonsurgical candidates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.12.051.
PMID: 16678583BACKGROUNDWang H, Littrup PJ, Duan Y, Zhang Y, Feng H, Nie Z. Thoracic masses treated with percutaneous cryotherapy: initial experience with more than 200 procedures. Radiology. 2005 Apr;235(1):289-98. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2351030747.
PMID: 15798173BACKGROUNDBlazeby JM, Avery K, Sprangers M, Pikhart H, Fayers P, Donovan J. Health-related quality of life measurement in randomized clinical trials in surgical oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3178-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2951.
PMID: 16809741BACKGROUNDWare J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PMID: 8628042BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. Clinical Trial Specialist
- Organization
- Galil Medical, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Boston Scientific
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hiran Fernando, MD
Boston Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2011
First Posted
March 3, 2011
Study Start
January 4, 2012
Primary Completion
August 30, 2018
Study Completion
August 30, 2018
Last Updated
July 19, 2021
Results First Posted
October 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share