NCT03627676

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate for the first time prospectively the efficacy on the symptoms and the tolerance of percutaneous cryoablation performed under radiological guidance of endometriosis of the abdominal wall in alternative to surgery after validation in multidisciplinary meeting.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 8, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 29, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2018

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

May 29, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Nodules of endometriosisCryoablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To evaluate the clinical efficacy at 6 months of cryoablation on the pain initially presented by the patients, pain being the principal reason of consultation.

    The post-therapeutic pain is quantified by Numerical Scale (NS) at 6 months of cryoablation. Clinical success is defined as a complete response (NS= 0) or a reduction of at least 50% in the NS score at baseline.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Complications rate at 6 months of cryoablation

    6 months

  • The rate of full hospitalization after cryoablation when an outpatient basis was planned

    6 months

  • The length of hospitalization (number of days) when a full hospitalization was planned

    6 months

  • The evolution of pain (1)

    baseline

  • The evolution of pain (2)

    hour 0

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Cryoablation

Interventions

CryoablationPROCEDURE

Two percutaneous cryoprobes would be used for all patients. The 17-Gauge cryoprobes is introduced into the masses under US guidance. Mean distance to the skin has to be 5mm at least. Although US guidance is used, a non-enhanced CT scan may be used to assess the position of the cryoprobes before ablation, and to obtain a baseline examination in order to avoid thermal injuries to adjacent tissues such as the bowel during the ice growth. No ice extension to the skin has to be observed during cycles assessed by real-time US monitoring. Each cryoablation procedure involves 3 successive cycles: 10 minutes freeze with Argon gas, followed by 9 minutes passive and 1 minute active thawing with Helium gas, followed by a second 7 minutes freeze. The ice covered the entire targeted lesion on the short axes is visualize by US or CT-scan performed at the end of the three cycles or after repositioning. At the end of the cryoablation procedures, the probes are removed through active thawing.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient ≥18 years,
  • Initial radiological diagnosis of endometriosis of the abdominal wall, radiologically proven by MRI (or Doppler-ultrasound or CT-scan) with or without contrast injection,
  • Symptomatic nodule (pain),
  • Patient in at least one of the following situations:
  • Failure of previous treatments: recurrence of symptoms (pain) after medical therapies following the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) recommendations and / or prior surgery,
  • Or first-line or second-line medical therapies following the HAS recommendations considered as potentially non effective locally in multidisciplinary consultation meeting, or contraindicated or refused by patient,
  • Or surgery considered as potentially non effective locally or as a potential cause of adverse effects and morbidity because too devastating, in multidisciplinary consultation meeting,
  • Cryoablation technically feasible after discussion in multidisciplinary consultation meeting:
  • localization at a distance of 5 mm from the skin (risk of skin lesion if the ice ball is at less than 5 mm from the skin) and from major nervous structures (risk of sideration),
  • nodules maximum
  • nodule size up to 5 cm (\<5 cm) in the largest diameter
  • Absence of contraindications to general anesthesia if applicable,
  • Effective contraception during participation in the study.
  • Informed consent signed,
  • Patient affiliated to a social security.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant woman,
  • Documented infectious disease,
  • Patient included in another interventional study,
  • Impossibility to submit to the medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons,
  • Patients deprived of liberty or subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Radiology Department

Paris, 75970, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis

Interventions

Cryosurgery

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ablation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • François Cornelis, Professor

    Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

François Cornelis, Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2018

First Posted

August 13, 2018

Study Start

February 8, 2018

Primary Completion

July 1, 2020

Study Completion

October 1, 2020

Last Updated

March 14, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations