Efficacy of Cryoablation of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis
CRYOENDOMET
2 other identifiers
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate for the first time prospectively the efficacy on the symptoms and the tolerance of percutaneous cryoablation performed under radiological guidance of endometriosis of the abdominal wall in alternative to surgery after validation in multidisciplinary meeting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 14, 2019
February 1, 2019
2.4 years
May 29, 2018
March 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the clinical efficacy at 6 months of cryoablation on the pain initially presented by the patients, pain being the principal reason of consultation.
The post-therapeutic pain is quantified by Numerical Scale (NS) at 6 months of cryoablation. Clinical success is defined as a complete response (NS= 0) or a reduction of at least 50% in the NS score at baseline.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Complications rate at 6 months of cryoablation
6 months
The rate of full hospitalization after cryoablation when an outpatient basis was planned
6 months
The length of hospitalization (number of days) when a full hospitalization was planned
6 months
The evolution of pain (1)
baseline
The evolution of pain (2)
hour 0
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Two percutaneous cryoprobes would be used for all patients. The 17-Gauge cryoprobes is introduced into the masses under US guidance. Mean distance to the skin has to be 5mm at least. Although US guidance is used, a non-enhanced CT scan may be used to assess the position of the cryoprobes before ablation, and to obtain a baseline examination in order to avoid thermal injuries to adjacent tissues such as the bowel during the ice growth. No ice extension to the skin has to be observed during cycles assessed by real-time US monitoring. Each cryoablation procedure involves 3 successive cycles: 10 minutes freeze with Argon gas, followed by 9 minutes passive and 1 minute active thawing with Helium gas, followed by a second 7 minutes freeze. The ice covered the entire targeted lesion on the short axes is visualize by US or CT-scan performed at the end of the three cycles or after repositioning. At the end of the cryoablation procedures, the probes are removed through active thawing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient ≥18 years,
- Initial radiological diagnosis of endometriosis of the abdominal wall, radiologically proven by MRI (or Doppler-ultrasound or CT-scan) with or without contrast injection,
- Symptomatic nodule (pain),
- Patient in at least one of the following situations:
- Failure of previous treatments: recurrence of symptoms (pain) after medical therapies following the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) recommendations and / or prior surgery,
- Or first-line or second-line medical therapies following the HAS recommendations considered as potentially non effective locally in multidisciplinary consultation meeting, or contraindicated or refused by patient,
- Or surgery considered as potentially non effective locally or as a potential cause of adverse effects and morbidity because too devastating, in multidisciplinary consultation meeting,
- Cryoablation technically feasible after discussion in multidisciplinary consultation meeting:
- localization at a distance of 5 mm from the skin (risk of skin lesion if the ice ball is at less than 5 mm from the skin) and from major nervous structures (risk of sideration),
- nodules maximum
- nodule size up to 5 cm (\<5 cm) in the largest diameter
- Absence of contraindications to general anesthesia if applicable,
- Effective contraception during participation in the study.
- Informed consent signed,
- Patient affiliated to a social security.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant woman,
- Documented infectious disease,
- Patient included in another interventional study,
- Impossibility to submit to the medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons,
- Patients deprived of liberty or subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Radiology Department
Paris, 75970, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
François Cornelis, Professor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2018
First Posted
August 13, 2018
Study Start
February 8, 2018
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share