A Study of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Adaptation Training in Early Intervention for Psychosis
1 other identifier
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study will involve a randomized trial of Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) for early intervention as compared against an active control in which Action Based Cognitive Remediation (ABCR) will be applied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedJuly 23, 2018
July 1, 2018
3.1 years
April 8, 2015
July 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Adaptive Functioning (SOFAS)
A global level of social and occupational functioning will be obtained using the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale from the DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). The SOFAS rates global functioning on a scale from 0 to 100. The rating does not take into account level of symptomatology.
Change from baseline to 4 months and 9 months
Change in Adaptive Functioning (SFS)
The Social Functioning Scale (SFS; Birchwood et al., 1990) will be administered. This is a self-report measure that details the frequency and intensity with which the person engages in functional activities. A total score and domain scores for social withdrawal, relationships, social activity, recreational activity, independence (competence), independence (performance) and employment are generated.
Change from baseline to 4 months and 9 months
change in Adaptive Functioning (MCAS)
Both client and clinician versions of 17-item The Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS, Barker et al., 1994) will be used to assess functionality.
Change from baseline to 4 months and 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Medication Adherence
Throughout the 9 months of participation.
Hospitalization
Throughout the 9 months of participation.
Change in Goal Attainment (GAS)
Change from baseline to 4 months and 9 months
Change in Caregiver Burden (IEQ)
Change from baseline to 4 months and 9 months
Change in Cognition (WRAT-III)
Change from baseline to 4 months and 9 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Adaptation Training
EXPERIMENTALCognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is a standardized approach to the use of environmental supports for improving multiple domains of adaptive functioning including adherence to medication, grooming, and activities of daily living in patients with schizophrenia.
Action Based Cognitive Remediation
ACTIVE COMPARATORABCR is applied in once weekly 2 hour sessions in small groups (6-8 per group). In these group sessions, simulated bridging activities are done immediately following computerized cognitive activation to increase the chance that participants retain the strategies just developed in a real life environment.
Interventions
Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is a manual-driven standardized approach that uses environmental supports to improve multiple domains of adaptive functioning including adherence to medication, grooming, and activities of daily living in patients with schizophrenia. Interventions for each functional deficit are based on two dimensions 1) level of impairment in executive functions (determined by neurocognitive tests) and 2) whether the overt behavior of the individual is characterized more by apathy (poverty of speech/movement/inability to initiate and follow through on behavioral sequences), disinhibition (distractibility/behavior which is highly cue-driven) or a combination of these styles (based on the Frontal Lobe Personality Scale (FLOPS).
ABCR is applied in once weekly 2 hour sessions in small groups (6-8 per group). In these group sessions, simulated bridging activities are done immediately following computerized cognitive activation to increase the chance that participants retain the strategies just developed in a real life environment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be CAMH clients, have an assigned caseworker, be between the ages of 16-34 and have a psychosis such as schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
You may not qualify if:
- not currently experiencing high level of paranoia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Related Publications (14)
Alphs LD, Summerfelt A, Lann H, Muller RJ. The negative symptom assessment: a new instrument to assess negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1989;25(2):159-63. No abstract available.
PMID: 2602512BACKGROUNDBERG EA. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol. 1948 Jul;39:15-22. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159. No abstract available.
PMID: 18889466BACKGROUNDBirchwood M, Smith J, Cochrane R, Wetton S, Copestake S. The Social Functioning Scale. The development and validation of a new scale of social adjustment for use in family intervention programmes with schizophrenic patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:853-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.853.
PMID: 2289094BACKGROUNDDelis, D., Kramer, J., Kaplan. E., & Ober, B. (1987). California Verbal Learning and Memory Test (Manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
BACKGROUNDDraper ML, Stutes DS, Maples NJ, Velligan DI. Cognitive adaptation training for outpatients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychol. 2009 Aug;65(8):842-53. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20612.
PMID: 19521972BACKGROUNDKelland DZ, Lewis RF. The Digit Vigilance Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to diazepam. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(4):339-44.
PMID: 14588938BACKGROUNDKidd SA, Kaur J, Virdee G, George TP, McKenzie K, Herman Y. Cognitive remediation for individuals with psychosis in a supported education setting: a randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2014 Aug;157(1-3):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
PMID: 24893903BACKGROUNDKidd SA, Herman Y, Barbic S, Ganguli R, George TP, Hassan S, McKenzie K, Maples N, Velligan D. Testing a modification of cognitive adaptation training: streamlining the model for broader implementation. Schizophr Res. 2014 Jun;156(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
PMID: 24794880BACKGROUNDRadford LM, Chaney EF, O'Leary MR, O'Leary DE. Screening for cognitive impairment among inpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1978 Sep;39(9):712-5.
PMID: 690089BACKGROUNDThe Psychological Corporation. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
BACKGROUNDVentura J, Green MF, Shaner A, Liberman RP: Training and quality assurance with the brief psychiatric rating scale: The drift busters. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1993; 3:221-24
BACKGROUNDWilkinson ,G. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test 3 (Manual). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Inc.
BACKGROUNDDiagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC
BACKGROUNDBarker S, Barron N, McFarland BH, Bigelow DA. A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part I. Reliability and validity. Community Ment Health J. 1994 Aug;30(4):363-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02207489.
PMID: 7956112BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sean Kidd
Clinician Scientist
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinician Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2015
First Posted
April 30, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07