NCT02946255

Brief Summary

The investigators propose to examine the effectiveness of a brief intervention that might better facilitate the transition into the community for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder with psychotic features. The intervention is called the Welcome Basket. It involves Peer Support Workers connecting with and supporting hospitalized individuals in the days before discharge and again in the community in the first month immediately following discharge. The investigators will compare the outcomes of discharge from hospital as usual with the full version of the welcome basket and a preliminary test of an abbreviated 2 visit version of the intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 12, 2016

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 27, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 16, 2017

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2019

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

October 12, 2016

Results QC Date

April 21, 2022

Last Update Submit

August 28, 2023

Conditions

Psychosis

Keywords

PsychosisPsychosis NOSSchizophreniaHospital dischargeInpatient psychiatry

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Multnomah Community Ability Scale - Participant Interview Based

    Community Functioning and change in adaptive functioning will be assessed with the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS), a 17-item scale assessing domains of functionality including health, adjustment to living, social competence, and behavioral problems (completed at all time points). This measure best reflects the primary aim of this intervention: to support a greater degree of illness self-management, independence, and level of community activity. The MCAS will be scored based upon interviews with participants and by the primary clinician (inpatient for baseline and case managers for post and follow up measures). The total score is reported here and is the sum of the 4 subscale totals (Health, Adaptation, Social Skills, Behaviour). The min total score is 17 and the max is 85 with higher values representing better outcomes.

    Baseline

  • Multnomah Community Ability Scale - Participant Interview Based

    Community Functioning and change in adaptive functioning will be assessed with the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS), a 17-item scale assessing domains of functionality including health, adjustment to living, social competence, and behavioral problems (completed at all time points). This measure best reflects the primary aim of this intervention: to support a greater degree of illness self-management, independence, and level of community activity. The MCAS will be scored based upon interviews with participants and by the primary clinician (inpatient for baseline and case managers for post and follow up measures). The total score is reported here and is the sum of the 4 subscale totals (Health, Adaptation, Social Skills, Behaviour). The min total score is 17 and the max is 85 with higher values representing better outcomes.

    4 Week Follow-Up

  • Multnomah Community Ability Scale - Participant Interview Based

    Community Functioning and change in adaptive functioning will be assessed with the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS), a 17-item scale assessing domains of functionality including health, adjustment to living, social competence, and behavioral problems (completed at all time points). This measure best reflects the primary aim of this intervention: to support a greater degree of illness self-management, independence, and level of community activity. The MCAS will be scored based upon interviews with participants and by the primary clinician (inpatient for baseline and case managers for post and follow up measures). The total score is reported here and is the sum of the 4 subscale totals (Health, Adaptation, Social Skills, Behaviour). The min total score is 17 and the max is 85 with higher values representing better outcomes.

    6 Month Follow-Up

  • Multnomah Community Ability Scale - Clinician Based

    Community Functioning and change in adaptive functioning will be assessed with the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS), a 17-item scale assessing domains of functionality including health, adjustment to living, social competence, and behavioral problems (completed at all time points). This measure best reflects the primary aim of this intervention: to support a greater degree of illness self-management, independence, and level of community activity. The MCAS will be scored based upon interviews with participants and by the primary clinician (inpatient for baseline and case managers for post and follow up measures). The total score is reported here and is the sum of the 4 subscale totals (Health, Adaptation, Social Skills, Behaviour). The min total score is 17 and the max is 85 with higher values representing better outcomes.

    Baseline

  • Multnomah Community Ability Scale - Clinician Based

    Community Functioning and change in adaptive functioning will be assessed with the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS), a 17-item scale assessing domains of functionality including health, adjustment to living, social competence, and behavioral problems (completed at all time points). This measure best reflects the primary aim of this intervention: to support a greater degree of illness self-management, independence, and level of community activity. The MCAS will be scored based upon interviews with participants and by the primary clinician (inpatient for baseline and case managers for post and follow up measures). The total score is reported here and is the sum of the 4 subscale totals (Health, Adaptation, Social Skills, Behaviour). The min total score is 17 and the max is 85 with higher values representing better outcomes.

    4 Week Follow-Up

  • Multnomah Community Ability Scale - Clinician Based

    Community Functioning and change in adaptive functioning will be assessed with the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS), a 17-item scale assessing domains of functionality including health, adjustment to living, social competence, and behavioral problems (completed at all time points). This measure best reflects the primary aim of this intervention: to support a greater degree of illness self-management, independence, and level of community activity. The MCAS will be scored based upon interviews with participants and by the primary clinician (inpatient for baseline and case managers for post and follow up measures). The total score is reported here and is the sum of the 4 subscale totals (Health, Adaptation, Social Skills, Behaviour). The min total score is 17 and the max is 85 with higher values representing better outcomes.

    6 Month Follow-Up

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Hospitalizations and Emergency Room Visits

    Baseline to 6 Month Follow-Up

  • The Satisfaction With Life Scale

    4 Week Follow-Up

  • The Satisfaction With Life Scale

    6 Month Follow-Up

  • Social Support Survey

    Baseline

  • Social Support Survey

    4 Week Follow-Up

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Welcome Basket Brief (WBbr)

EXPERIMENTAL

The brief version of the Welcome Basket (WBbr) was developed based upon the observation in feasibility testing that for some participants much of the benefit of this approach appeared to be centred upon the visits immediately prior and subsequent to discharge. In the WBbr the same core components will be present, albeit in an abbreviated form with one 30-60 minute visit in the week prior to discharge and a single, 3-hour visit in the week subsequent to discharge in which the welcome basket would be delivered, core CAT strategies discussed and implemented, and some basic orientation to community resources undertaken. This brief version of the intervention has not to date been studied.

Behavioral: Welcome Basket Brief (WBbr)

Welcome Basket (WB)

EXPERIMENTAL

Peer Support Workers (PSWs) hold 1-2 meetings with clients (30-60 minutes) in the 2-week period before they are discharged from hospital. They describe the program and undertake an assessment. From this assessment the two core components of the intervention are initiated. First, a "welcome basket" is created for the client. The PSW also forms a plan with the client about tours of their neighbourhood to familiarize them with the local resources and support them in building confidence in accessing their local communities. These activities will take place through weekly visits (2 hours/visit) in the 4 weeks immediately following discharge. WB will be provided in combination with core Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) compensatory interventions.

Behavioral: Welcome Basket (WB)

Treatment As Usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual (TAU) involves the typical discharge procedures for clients from Unit 2, Forensic and EPU wards at CAMH. It includes referral to outpatient psychiatric services and relevant community supports with the transition facilitated by inpatient social work staff.

Behavioral: Treatment As Usual

Interventions

Welcome Basket (WB)BEHAVIORAL

Peer Support Workers (PSWs) hold 1-2 meetings with clients (30-60 minutes) in the 2-week period before they are discharged from hospital. They describe the program and undertake an assessment. From this assessment the two core components of the intervention are initiated. First, a "welcome basket" is created for the client. The PSW also forms a plan with the client about tours of their neighbourhood to familiarize them with the local resources and support them in building confidence in accessing their local communities. These activities will take place through weekly visits (2 hours/visit) in the 4 weeks immediately following discharge. WB will be provided in combination with core Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) compensatory interventions.

Welcome Basket (WB)
Welcome Basket Brief (WBbr)BEHAVIORAL

The brief version of the Welcome Basket (WBbr) was developed based upon the observation in feasibility testing that for some participants much of the benefit of this approach appeared to be centred upon the visits immediately prior and subsequent to discharge. In the WBbr the same core components will be present, albeit in an abbreviated form with one 30-60 minute visit in the week prior to discharge and a single, 3-hour visit in the week subsequent to discharge in which the welcome basket would be delivered, core CAT strategies discussed and implemented, and some basic orientation to community resources undertaken. This brief version of the intervention has not to date been studied.

Welcome Basket Brief (WBbr)
Treatment As UsualBEHAVIORAL

Treatment as usual (TAU) involves the typical discharge procedures for clients from Unit 2, Forensic and EPU wards at CAMH. It includes referral to outpatient psychiatric services and relevant community supports with the transition facilitated by inpatient social work staff.

Treatment As Usual

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants will be adults, 18 years of age or older, with a chart diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum mental illness or bipolar disorder with psychotic features confirmed by Module B (psychotic symptoms) of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) (First, William, Karg, \& Spitzer, 2015). All participants will be on CAMH inpatient units at the time of recruitment and will have been in continuous inpatient care for close to or more than 2 weeks. This timeframe is guided by the rationale and experience indicating that an overly brief period of hospitalization circumscribes the relevance of the intervention.
  • Participants will be returning to places of residence in the Greater Toronto Area (catchment of CAMH) or can travel to the GTA if they will reside outside the catchment area.
  • Participants must have been referred to outpatient case management.
  • Proposed housing arrangements must be stable and conducive to the intervention. If homelessness or emergency shelter residence appears likely, or boarding home policy precludes any external staff from entering the premises, such individuals will be excluded.
  • Proficiency in English.

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Do not meet the above criteria.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Barker S, Barron N, McFarland BH, Bigelow DA. A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part I. Reliability and validity. Community Ment Health J. 1994 Aug;30(4):363-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02207489.

    PMID: 7956112BACKGROUND

  • Lee, K., Brekke, J., Yamada, A., & Chou, C. (2010). Longitudinal invariance of the satisfaction with life scale for individuals with schizophrenia. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(2), 234-241.

    BACKGROUND

  • Derogatis, L.R.(1993). BSI Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring, and Procedure Manual (4th Ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

    BACKGROUND

  • Barbic, S., Kidd, SA, Backman, C., MacEwan, W.. Honer, W., & McKenzie, K. (2016). The development and testing of the Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (PROM) [in preparation].

    BACKGROUND

  • Stergiopoulos V, Gozdzik A, Misir V, Skosireva A, Connelly J, Sarang A, Whisler A, Hwang SW, O'Campo P, McKenzie K. Effectiveness of Housing First with Intensive Case Management in an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Homeless Adults with Mental Illness: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0130281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130281. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26176621BACKGROUND

  • First MB, William JBW, Karg RS, Spitzer RL: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Research Version (SCID-5 for DSM-5, Research Version; SCRID-5-RV). Arlington,VA, American Psychiatric-Association, 2015.

    BACKGROUND

  • Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705-14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-b.

    PMID: 2035047BACKGROUND

  • Dennis ML, Chan YF, Funk RR. Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults. Am J Addict. 2006;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):80-91. doi: 10.1080/10550490601006055.

    PMID: 17182423BACKGROUND

  • Birchwood M, Smith J, Cochrane R, Wetton S, Copestake S. The Social Functioning Scale. The development and validation of a new scale of social adjustment for use in family intervention programmes with schizophrenic patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:853-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.853.

    PMID: 2289094BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychotic DisordersMental DisordersSchizophrenia

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

Limitations and Caveats

The metrics employed in this study may have lacked sufficient sensitivity given the short time frame of this study. Other limitations of this study included its deployment at a single clinical site, a limited sample size, a relatively short follow-up period, and un-blinded participants. Diversity in participant clinical profiles and life circumstances may have also influenced these findings with a recruitment strategy that included both early intervention and chronic care units.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Sean Kidd
Organization
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
sean.kidd@camh.ca
416-535-8501

Study Officials

  • Sean A Kidd, PhD

    Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Independent Clinician Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2016

First Posted

October 27, 2016

Study Start

May 16, 2017

Primary Completion

September 1, 2019

Study Completion

September 1, 2019

Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Results First Posted

March 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

CA(1)