Online Yoga and the Impact on Psychosis
Exploring the Impact of Online Yoga on Outcome and Recovery in People With Psychosis.
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Yoga and mindfulness are considered complementary and alternative healthcare options that involve breathing techniques, relaxation, and bodily postures (yoga only). Research has shown a positive effect of these on depression, quality of life, and other symptoms of psychosis. As an 8-week pilot study, the goal is to offer yoga and/or mindfulness online and to explore the effect on recovery and quality of life for people with psychosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 5, 2022
CompletedJune 16, 2022
September 1, 2021
12 months
June 15, 2021
June 13, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (28)
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at week 4
The CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at week 8
The CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at week 12
The CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at 6 months
The CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (6 month - baseline).
Baseline and 6 Months
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 4 weeks
The PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 8 weeks
The PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 12 weeks
The PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 6 months
The PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (6 month - baseline).
Baseline and 6 Months
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at week 4
The QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at week 8
The QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at week 12
The QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at 6 months
The QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Baseline and 6 Months
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at week 4
The SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at week 8
The SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at week 12
The SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at 6 months
The SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Baseline and 6 Months
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at week 4
The BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at week 8
The BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at week 12
The BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at 6 months
The BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Baseline and 6 Months
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at week 4
The SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at week 8
The SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at week 12
The SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at 6 months
The SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Baseline and 6 Months
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at week 4
The M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at week 8
The M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at week 12
The M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at 6 months
The M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Baseline and 6 Months
Study Arms (2)
Clinical
EXPERIMENTALClinical participants with a primary diagnosis of psychosis or related disorder.
Non-clinical
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-clinical participants with no mental health diagnoses.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For clinical participants:
- primary diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (schizophrenia, schizophreniform, schizoaffective) or related psychotic disorder (delusional, brief psychotic, paraphrenia, bipolar with psychotic features, major-depressive with psychotic features)
- access to protected internet (i.e., home internet plugged or password protected wireless)
- adequate space to do yoga (e.g., at least 2 feet around each side of the yoga mat)
- able to speak and read English
- competent and able to offer voluntary informed consent to participate
- For non-clinical participants (healthy controls):
- not diagnosed with or received care for any mental illness
- access to protected internet (i.e., home internet plugged or password protected wireless)
- adequate space to do yoga (e.g., at least 2 feet around each side of the yoga mat)
- able to speak and read English
- competent and able to offer voluntary informed consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- For clinical participants:
- not clinically stable; that is, major change in primary medication (e.g., switching or stopping antipsychotic) or hospitalisation within the past 4 weeks prior to first contact
- currently with a physical ailment that restricts light movement exercises for yoga or chair yoga
- For non-clinical participants (healthy controls):
- have a first-degree relative with psychosis (schizophrenia, schizo-affective, schizophreniform, paraphrenia, brief psychotic, delusional, or bipolar or major depressive disorder with psychotic features)
- had a substance or alcohol abuse/dependence in the past 6 months
- currently with a physical ailment that restricts light movement exercises for yoga or chair yoga
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Royal Ottawa Mental Heatlh Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Z7K4, Canada
Related Publications (28)
Andersson G. Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatments. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:157-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093006. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
PMID: 26652054BACKGROUNDAndersson G, Titov N, Dear BF, Rozental A, Carlbring P. Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation. World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):20-28. doi: 10.1002/wps.20610.
PMID: 30600624BACKGROUNDAust J, Bradshaw T. Mindfulness interventions for psychosis: a systematic review of the literature. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Feb;24(1):69-83. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12357. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
PMID: 27928859BACKGROUNDBartels SJ, Clark RE, Peacock WJ, Dums AR, Pratt SI. Medicare and medicaid costs for schizophrenia patients by age cohort compared with costs for depression, dementia, and medically ill patients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Nov-Dec;11(6):648-57. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.11.6.648.
PMID: 14609805BACKGROUNDJayaram N, Varambally S, Behere RV, Venkatasubramanian G, Arasappa R, Christopher R, Gangadhar BN. Effect of yoga therapy on plasma oxytocin and facial emotion recognition deficits in patients of schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;55(Suppl 3):S409-13. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.116318.
PMID: 24049210BACKGROUNDBirchwood M, Smith J, Drury V, Healy J, Macmillan F, Slade M. A self-report Insight Scale for psychosis: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Jan;89(1):62-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01487.x.
PMID: 7908156BACKGROUNDChang CK, Hayes RD, Perera G, Broadbent MT, Fernandes AC, Lee WE, Hotopf M, Stewart R. Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019590. Epub 2011 May 18.
PMID: 21611123BACKGROUNDCramer H, Lauche R, Haller H, Langhorst J, Dobos G. Mindfulness- and Acceptance-based Interventions for Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Glob Adv Health Med. 2016 Jan;5(1):30-43. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2015.083. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
PMID: 26937312BACKGROUNDDollfus S, Mach C, Morello R. Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms: A Novel Tool to Assess Negative Symptoms. Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):571-8. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv161. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
PMID: 26564898BACKGROUNDDuraiswamy G, Thirthalli J, Nagendra HR, Gangadhar BN. Yoga therapy as an add-on treatment in the management of patients with schizophrenia--a randomized controlled trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Sep;116(3):226-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01032.x.
PMID: 17655565BACKGROUNDFoussias G, Agid O, Fervaha G, Remington G. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia: clinical features, relevance to real world functioning and specificity versus other CNS disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 May;24(5):693-709. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
PMID: 24275699BACKGROUNDKay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.
PMID: 3616518BACKGROUNDKolbaek P, Blicher AB, Buus CW, Feller SG, Holm T, Dines D, O'Leary KM, Sorensen RS, Opler M, Correll CU, Mors O, Bech P, Ostergaard SD. Inter-rater reliability of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) obtained using the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI). Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;72(6):431-436. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1492014. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
PMID: 30037286BACKGROUNDKrause M, Zhu Y, Huhn M, Schneider-Thoma J, Bighelli I, Nikolakopoulou A, Leucht S. Antipsychotic drugs for patients with schizophrenia and predominant or prominent negative symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Oct;268(7):625-639. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0869-3. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
PMID: 29368205BACKGROUNDLeucht S. Measurements of response, remission, and recovery in schizophrenia and examples for their clinical application. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75 Suppl 1:8-14. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13049su1c.02.
PMID: 24581453BACKGROUNDLeucht S, Leucht C, Huhn M, Chaimani A, Mavridis D, Helfer B, Samara M, Rabaioli M, Bacher S, Cipriani A, Geddes JR, Salanti G, Davis JM. Sixty Years of Placebo-Controlled Antipsychotic Drug Trials in Acute Schizophrenia: Systematic Review, Bayesian Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Efficacy Predictors. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;174(10):927-942. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16121358. Epub 2017 May 25.
PMID: 28541090BACKGROUNDOstergaard SD, Lemming OM, Mors O, Correll CU, Bech P. PANSS-6: a brief rating scale for the measurement of severity in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Jun;133(6):436-44. doi: 10.1111/acps.12526. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
PMID: 26558537BACKGROUNDOstergaard SD, Opler MGA, Correll CU. Bridging the Measurement Gap Between Research and Clinical Care in Schizophrenia: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6 (PANSS-6) and Other Assessments Based on the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI). Innov Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;14(11-12):68-72.
PMID: 29410939BACKGROUNDSheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
PMID: 9881538BACKGROUNDSpijkerman MP, Pots WT, Bohlmeijer ET. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
PMID: 27111302BACKGROUNDTennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
PMID: 18042300BACKGROUNDUebelacker L, Dufour SC, Dinerman JG, Walsh SL, Hearing C, Gillette LT, Deckersbach T, Nierenberg AA, Weinstock L, Sylvia LG. Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of an Online Yoga Class for Mood Disorders: A MoodNetwork Study. J Psychiatr Pract. 2018 Jan;24(1):60-67. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000286.
PMID: 29320386BACKGROUNDvan der Krieke L, Wunderink L, Emerencia AC, de Jonge P, Sytema S. E-mental health self-management for psychotic disorders: state of the art and future perspectives. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jan 1;65(1):33-49. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300050.
PMID: 24129842BACKGROUNDVancampfort D, Vansteelandt K, Scheewe T, Probst M, Knapen J, De Herdt A, De Hert M. Yoga in schizophrenia: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012 Jul;126(1):12-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01865.x. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
PMID: 22486714BACKGROUNDVarambally S, Gangadhar BN. Yoga: a spiritual practice with therapeutic value in psychiatry. Asian J Psychiatr. 2012 Jun;5(2):186-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 May 18.
PMID: 22813667BACKGROUNDVarambally S, Gangadhar BN, Thirthalli J, Jagannathan A, Kumar S, Venkatasubramanian G, Muralidhar D, Subbakrishna DK, Nagendra HR. Therapeutic efficacy of add-on yogasana intervention in stabilized outpatient schizophrenia: Randomized controlled comparison with exercise and waitlist. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;54(3):227-32. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.102414.
PMID: 23226845BACKGROUNDVisceglia E, Lewis S. Yoga therapy as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia: a randomized, controlled pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Jul;17(7):601-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0075.
PMID: 21711202BACKGROUNDWolever RQ, Bobinet KJ, McCabe K, Mackenzie ER, Fekete E, Kusnick CA, Baime M. Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Apr;17(2):246-258. doi: 10.1037/a0027278. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
PMID: 22352291BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Bodnar, PhD
The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2021
First Posted
September 16, 2021
Study Start
November 11, 2021
Primary Completion
November 5, 2022
Study Completion
November 5, 2022
Last Updated
June 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share