Comparing Voiding Trials After Midurethral Sling for Stress Incontinence
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Force of Stream to Traditional Retrograde Fill Voiding Trial After Midurethral Sling With or Without Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Urinary incontinence is a prevalent health and quality of life concern affecting almost half of women over the age of 20. Urinary retention (abnormal holding of urine) is a concern of many surgeons who perform midurethral sling surgery. All patients after outpatient midurethral sling or vaginal prolpase surgery must complete a voiding trial if they are to be discharged without a catheter. The purpose of this study is to compare two different types of postoperative voiding trials to determine which leads to less post-operative issues, such as urinary retention requiring catheterization. You are being asked to participate because you are having midurethral sling surgery, either with or without vaginal prolapse repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 21, 2016
October 1, 2016
1.3 years
March 23, 2015
October 19, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of emergency room visits or unexpected visits to the office within 6 weeks postoperatively for voiding dysfunction or suspected infection
Any additional visit outside the patient's scheduled postoperative visits to the emergency room, urgent care facility or doctor's office will be recorded for up to 6 six weeks postoperatively
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of patients sent home with a catheter
6 weeks
Number of patients with reported UTI
6 weeks
Time to discharge from hospital
6 weeks
Patient satisfaction with postoperative bladder function
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
FAST voiding trial method
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1\) Bladder drained with indwelling foley catheter, then retrograde filled with 300cc sterile water. 2) catheter is removed; 3) Patient voids within 20 minutes (if unable to void after 20 minutes, she will be discharged home with a catheter secondary to voiding dysfunction). 4) The patient will subjectively quantify their FOS via VAS scale. 5) If VAS scale \>50 (=50%) the catheter will remain out, patient is discharged home without measuring a PVR 6) If VAS scale is from 0-49 (= 0-49%) a PVR will be checked via bladder scan. If PVR is \<500 the patient will be discharged WITHOUT a catheter; If PVR is \>500 the patient will be discharged WITH a catheter. If she is discharged with an indwelling foley catheter, she will have an in-office retrograde voiding trial in 2-5 days
Retrograde fill voiding trial method
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1\) Bladder drained with indwelling foley catheter, then retrograde filled with 300cc sterile water. 2) catheter is removed; 3) Patient voids within 20 minutes (if unable to void after 20 minutes, she will be discharged home with a catheter secondary to voiding dysfunction). 4) The patient will subjectively quantify their FOS via VAS scale (however this information will only be used for research purposes). 5) If she voids \>/= 2/3 (200cc) the catheter will remain out as she will have passed her voiding trial. If she voids \< 200cc she will be discharged home with a catheter and instructed to follow-up in 2-5 days for an in-office retrograde voiding trial in 2-5 days.
Interventions
1 of 2 tests to assess bladder function after midurethral sling surgery with and without anterior or posterior colporrhaphy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Postoperative patients after placement of midurethral sling (retropubic sling or transobturator) with or without anterior or posterior colporrhaphy.
- Ability to provide informed consent and complete all study requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who underwent a surgery that requires long term catheterization (i.e fistula repair or urethral diverticulum)
- Patients who sustained a cystotomy during surgery as our divisional protocol is to send these patients home with a Foley catheter for 5-14 days without a voiding trial
- Patients who had an apical repair for pelvic organ prolapse (Uterosacral vaginal vault suspension, Abdominal sacral colpopexy, sacrospinous ligament fixation)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwell Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Urogynecology, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Related Publications (11)
Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Chao F, De Souza A, Thomas E, Murray C, Conway C, Lee J. Repeat synthetic mid urethral sling procedure for women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.111.
PMID: 19913831BACKGROUNDKleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M. Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):49-52. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124841.
PMID: 12114887BACKGROUNDPulvino JQ, Duecy EE, Buchsbaum GM, Flynn MK. Comparison of 2 techniques to predict voiding efficiency after inpatient urogynecologic surgery. J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4):1408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.096. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PMID: 20727543BACKGROUNDIngber MS, Vasavada SP, Moore CK, Rackley RR, Firoozi F, Goldman HB. Force of stream after sling therapy: safety and efficacy of rapid discharge care pathway based on subjective patient report. J Urol. 2011 Mar;185(3):993-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.050. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
PMID: 21247598BACKGROUNDBarron KI, Savageau JA, Young SB, Labin LC, Morse AN. Prediction of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):570-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-0064-8. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
PMID: 16583182BACKGROUNDFoster RT Sr, Borawski KM, South MM, Weidner AC, Webster GD, Amundsen CL. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating 2 techniques of postoperative bladder testing after transvaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):627.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.017.
PMID: 18060956BACKGROUNDPeleg AY, Hooper DC. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1804-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0904124. No abstract available.
PMID: 20463340BACKGROUNDEl-Barky E, El-Shazly A, El-Wahab OA, Kehinde EO, Al-Hunayan A, Al-Awadi KA. Tension free vaginal tape versus Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(2):277-81. doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-6101-6.
PMID: 16142556BACKGROUNDBarber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Vasavada S, Ellerkmann M. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):611-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162f22e.
PMID: 18310363BACKGROUNDWard KL, Hilton P; UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01548.x. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
PMID: 17970791BACKGROUNDLiapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Long-term efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women: efficacy at 5- and 7-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Nov;19(11):1509-12. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0664-1. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
PMID: 18542836BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harvey A Winkler, MD
North Shore LIJ Divsion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- FPMRS Fellowship Director, Co-Chair Division of Urogynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2015
First Posted
March 26, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10