Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous Fill to Assess Voiding Function
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if two different methods of performing a postoperative voiding trial are equivalent in evaluating urinary retention after gynecologic surgery. Participants: The participants in this study will be women who have undergone gynecologic surgery at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedOctober 13, 2010
October 1, 2010
4 months
March 22, 2010
October 12, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence of urinary retention
Postoperative Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Spontaneous Fill Technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe allow the bladder to spontaneously fill, then allow the patient to void and afterward catheterize the patient to check a postvoid residual ("spontaneous fill" technique").
Retrograde Fill Technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe assess bladder emptying by filling the bladder retrograde through the catheter already in place with 300 mL of saline and then removing the catheter and allowing the patient to void ("retrograde-fill" technique). We will determine postvoid residual indirectly by subtracting voided volume from the 300 mL infused volume. No catheterization will be performed with this technique unless they void less than 200 mL.
Interventions
After surgery, each woman will undergo a voiding trial to assess for urinary retention after surgery. This is performed on all patients undergoing surgery involving prolapse or incontinence. There are two methods commonly used to perform a voiding trial: Spontaneous Fill and Retrograde Fill techniques. Both are considered standard of care. The goal of the study is to perform both on each patient to assess their equivalency. There are no experimental interventions taking place.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Women undergoing surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence
You may not qualify if:
- Unwillingness to participate in the investigation.
- Inability to give informed consent.
- Known preoperative voiding dysfunction
- Plan for suprapubic catheter placement at time of surgery.
- Age less than 18
- Non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC-Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (3)
Bodker B, Lose G. Postoperative urinary retention in gynecologic patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Jun;14(2):94-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1038-3. Epub 2003 Apr 23.
PMID: 12851750RESULTPartoll LM. Efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape with other pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1292-5; discussion 1295-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123736.
PMID: 12066111RESULTGeller EJ, Hankins KJ, Parnell BA, Robinson BL, Dunivan GC. Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):637-642. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318229e8dd.
PMID: 21860294DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kelly Hankins, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2010
First Posted
March 24, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 13, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-10