Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 4 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(4/4)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
50%(2 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
4
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution4 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
4(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

4 of 4 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

4

all time

Status Distribution
Completed(4)

Detailed Status

Completed4

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
4
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A4 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed4100%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 4 of 4
completednot_applicable

Comparing Force of Stream to Retrograde Fill Voiding Trial After Vaginal Apex Suspension

NCT02753920
completednot_applicable

Assessment of Two Postoperative Techniques Used to Predict Voiding Efficiency After Gynecologic Surgery

NCT00392210
completednot_applicable

Comparing Voiding Trials After Midurethral Sling for Stress Incontinence

NCT02400034
completednot_applicable

Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous Fill to Assess Voiding Function

NCT01091844

Clinical Trials (4)

Showing 4 of 4 trials
NCT02753920Not Applicable

Comparing Force of Stream to Retrograde Fill Voiding Trial After Vaginal Apex Suspension

Completed
NCT00392210Not Applicable

Assessment of Two Postoperative Techniques Used to Predict Voiding Efficiency After Gynecologic Surgery

Completed
NCT02400034Not Applicable

Comparing Voiding Trials After Midurethral Sling for Stress Incontinence

Completed
NCT01091844Not Applicable

Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous Fill to Assess Voiding Function

Completed

All 4 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
4