Effect of a Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Midurethral Sling During Prolapse Surgery
Effect of a New Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Concomitant Midurethral Sling During Prolapse Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse occurs with descent of one or more pelvic structures: the uterus and/or cervix, bowel, bladder, or rectum. Although options for treatment include expectant management, pelvic floor physical therapy, and pessary (intravaginal device) use, surgery is the only option which potentially offers a cure. It is well known that women with pelvic organ prolapse are at risk of developing new stress urinary incontinence symptoms after prolapse surgery. Stress urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine with an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, such as sneezing, coughing, or laughing. Previous studies have demonstrated that the addition of a prophylactic anti-incontinence procedure at the time of prolapse surgery reduces this risk. One example of such a procedure is a mesh sling placed underneath the urethra (midurethral sling). Nevertheless, the decision to place a midurethral sling to prevent stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery remains controversial. A new risk calculator tool has been developed to provide patients' with their individualized risk of developing de novo stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether use of this new personalized online risk calculator tool increases patient satisfaction with the decision whether or not to have a midurethral sling placed at the time of prolapse surgery to prevent development of stress urinary incontinence. The investigators hypothesize that use of this tool will increase patient satisfaction with their decision regarding midurethral sling placement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 20, 2022
January 1, 2022
1 year
April 9, 2014
January 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction with Decision Scale for Pelvic Floor Disorders
The primary outcome will be patient satisfaction with the decision for concomitant midurethral sling placement at 3 months postoperative in the intervention (risk calculator tool) group versus the control group, assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale for Pelvic Floor Disorders.
3 months postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Online risk calculator used
EXPERIMENTALOnline risk calculator tool for the development of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence used during preoperative counseling session.
Online risk calculator not used
PLACEBO COMPARATOROnline risk calculator tool for the development of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence not used during preoperative counseling session.
Interventions
A new online risk calculator tool has been developed to predict a woman's individual risk of developing de novo stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery. This validated tool has been shown to outperform preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing results and expert predictions when providing risk assessment of de novo stress urinary incontinence after vaginal prolapse surgery. After inputting individual patient characteristics, including patient age, body mass index, number of vaginal deliveries, presence or absence of urgency urinary incontinence and diabetes, and prolapse reduction stress testing results if available, this tool calculates the theoretical risk of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence both with and without an anti-incontinence procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ Stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q)
- Desire for prolapse surgery
- No symptoms of stress urinary incontinence preoperatively
- Age ≥ 18
- English-speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence preoperatively
- History of previous prolapse or anti-incontinence surgery
- Pregnancy
- Dementia or other cognitive impairment
- Unable or unwilling to complete post-operative questionnaires
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Related Publications (1)
Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Brubaker L, Rogers RG, Richter HE, Arya L, Barber MD, Shepherd JP, Nolen TL, Norton P, Sung V, Menefee S, Siddiqui N, Meikle SF, Kattan MW; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):279-287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000094.
PMID: 24402598BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeannine M. Miranne, MD, MS
Medstar Health Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MS, Fellow, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2014
First Posted
April 11, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01