Neurotech Vital Compact Versus Itouch Sure Pelvic Floor Exerciser US
A Single-blind, Multi-centre, Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority, Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Performance of the Neurotech Vital Compact Device Compared to the Itouch Sure Pelvic Floor Exerciser for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Female Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
12
Brief Summary
A prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multi-site clinical study employing Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) to stimulate the pelvic floor muscles of women suffering from stress urinary incontinence. Approximately one-hundred and eighty (180) female patients diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence will be enrolled in this study. All patients who are considered eligible to participate in the clinical study and give consent will be randomised to complete either a 12-week treatment programme with the Neurotech Vital Compact device or a 12-week treatment programme with the itouch Sure Pelvic Floor Exerciser. The 12-week treatment programme will be completed by the subjects at home with treatment with the device in accordance with the device Instructions for Use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 5, 2018
February 1, 2018
2 years
April 17, 2015
February 1, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of subjects who have achieved >50% improvement on the provocative pad weight test.
Subjects will complete an in-office 1 hour provocative pad test to determine volume of urine leaked during the test.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Between group comparison of mean change in urine leakage in a provocative pad weight test
12 Weeks
Within group comparison of mean change in urine leakage in the 1 hour pad weight test
12 weeks
Between group comparison of the mean improvement in the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) score
12 weeks
Between group comparison of the proportion of subjects achieving dryness
12 weeks
Between group comparison of mean change in the number of incontinence episodes per day.
12 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Neurotech Vital Compact
EXPERIMENTALThe Neurotech Vital Compact will be used by subjects with Stress Urinary Incontinence 5 days per week for 30 minutes per session for 12 weeks followed by 14 weeks of Kegel exercises.
itouch Sure Pelvic Floor Exerciser
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe itouch Sure Pelvic Floor Exerciser will be used by subjects with Stress Urinary Incontinence 7 days per week for 20 minutes per session for 12 weeks followed by 14 weeks of Kegel exercises.
Interventions
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor via an arrangement of external electrodes held in place by a garment.
Vaginal probe with electrodes designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the pelvic floor muscles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who are female and at least 18 years of age, and not more than 65 years of age.
- Subjects who have signed the informed consent form prior to any study related activity.
- Subjects who have previously tried and failed to improve their condition using Kegel exercises.
- Subjects who have been clinically diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence and demonstrate a greater than or equal to 3g urine leakage and a less than or equal to 90g urine leakage (\>3g and \< 90g) following a bladder-filling protocol and then a standardised stress test (provocative pad weight test) at the baseline assessment.
- Subjects who score 9 or less (\<9) out of 18 for the Urge Incontinence Questions and are confirmed as having predominant stress urinary incontinence on the Medical, Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging Urinary Incontinence (MESA) Questionnaire completed at the screening assessment.
- Subjects with a Body Mass Index of ≤ 35 kg/m2.
- Subjects of child-bearing potential who are using a highly effective contraceptive method (established use of oral, injected, implanted hormonal method of contraception or barrier method of contraception with spermicide).
- Subjects who are willing not to seek any other treatment for stress incontinence during the study period.
- Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this study and from whom consent has been obtained.
- Subjects who are able to understand this study and are willing to complete all the study assessments.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have an existing medical condition that would compromise their participation in the study, e.g. reduced sensory perception in the contact area of the stimulation electrodes; scars or vaginal tissue wounds, lesions or inflamed/infected areas in the contact area of the stimulation electrodes; vaginal bleeding between menstrual periods; uncontrolled diabetes.
- Subjects who have a physical condition that would make them unable to perform the study procedures, e.g. pelvic or hip surgery within the past 6 weeks.
- Subjects who have been diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
- Subjects with a history of an underlying neurological condition, e.g. Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy.
- Subjects with any bladder abnormality that would affect the urinary flow through the lower urinary tract including signs or symptoms of an active urinary tract infection, abnormal bladder capacity (e.g., \>300 cc), post void residual volume \>200 cc, spastic bladder, vesico-ureteral reflux or bladder stones.
- Subjects with a blood clotting disorder or who are taking anti-coagulant medications.
- Subjects who have previously had any uro-gynaecological related surgery that would affect the pelvic floor muscles or urinary flow through the urethra (excluding hysterectomy).
- Subjects who have previously had pelvic floor radiation.
- Subjects who have previously been treated for stress incontinence with injectable bulking agents and/or vaginal probes within the past 6 months.
- Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of prolapse greater than Stage 2.
- Subjects who are pregnant or could be pregnant.
- Subjects who are less than 6 months post-partum or who are lactating.
- Subjects who have any conductive intra-uterine devices or metal implants in the pelvic area, including hip and lumbar spine.
- Subjects with pelvic pain or fibromyalgia or paravaginal defect.
- Subjects with an active implanted medical device (i.e. pacemaker, insulin pump etc.) or conditions that may be adversely affected by electrical stimulation (e.g. cardiac arrhythmias).
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Atlantic Therapeuticslead
- Bio-Medical Research, Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (12)
Maricopa Integrated Health Systems
Phoenix, Arizona, 85008, United States
University of California Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102, United States
Altus Research
Lake Worth, Florida, 33461, United States
University of South Florida Medical Center
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Boston Clinical Trials
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
AccuMed Research Associates
Garden City, New York, 11530, United States
Lyndhurst Gynecological Associates
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
The Jackson Clinic
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305, United States
Renaissance Health & Surgical Associates
South Pittsburg, Tennessee, 37380, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Conor Minogue, PhD
Bio-Medical Research, Ltd.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2015
First Posted
April 22, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02