NCT02378129

Brief Summary

The aim of this randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the desensitizing efficacies of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional glass ionomer cement Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) at 2-year follow-up.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 2, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2015

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 4, 2015

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 17, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

February 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Dentin SensitivityDentin Desensitizing AgentsGlass Ionomer CementsRandomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Scores as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Tactile and air blast tests to evaluate pain with VAS

    Change from Baseline in Pain Scores at 20 minutes; at 7, 15, 21, 30 days; and after 3, 6, 12, 24 months.

Study Arms (2)

Clinpro XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)

EXPERIMENTAL

Resin-modified glass ionomer cement

Drug: Resin-modified glass ionomer cement Clinpro XT

Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional glass ionomer cement

Drug: Glass Ionomer cement Vidrion R

Interventions

Clinpro XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)

Also known as: Clinpro XT (3M Espe, USA)
Clinpro XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)

Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK)

Also known as: Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK)
Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK)

Eligibility Criteria

Age28 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female subjects between 18 and 70 years old
  • At least 2 teeth with dentin hypersensitivity in two different hemiarchs
  • Dental elements with hypersensitivity without any pulp alteration
  • People who are not taking any medication and women who are not pregnant
  • Patients without eating disorders or very acidic diets.

You may not qualify if:

  • Teeth with hypersensitivity that presented extensive or unsatisfactory restorations, fractures, periodontal alterations, caries lesions, orthodontic brackets, endodontic treatments, pulp alterations.
  • Subjects who received any desensitizing therapy during the last 3 months
  • Subjects being under analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs at the time of the study
  • Teeth with hypersensitivity and non-carious cervical lesions

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • Lund RG, Silva AF, Piva E, Da Rosa WL, Heckmann SS, Demarco FF. Clinical evaluation of two desensitizing treatments in southern Brazil: A 3-month follow-up. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1469-74. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.770919. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

    PMID: 24180588BACKGROUND
  • Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and pulp fluid: its significance in relation to dentinal sensitivity. Annu Meet Am Inst Oral Biol. 1966;23:219. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5228880BACKGROUND
  • da Rosa WL, Lund RG, Piva E, da Silva AF. The effectiveness of current dentin desensitizing agents used to treat dental hypersensitivity: a systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2013 Jul;44(7):535-46. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a29610.

    PMID: 23616976BACKGROUND
  • Que K, Guo B, Jia Z, Chen Z, Yang J, Gao P. A cross-sectional study: non-carious cervical lesions, cervical dentine hypersensitivity and related risk factors. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Jan;40(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02342.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.

    PMID: 22882712BACKGROUND
  • Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jul;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321.

    PMID: 16803826BACKGROUND
  • Madruga MM, Silva AF, Rosa WL, Piva E, Lund RG. Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jan 5;31:e3. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0003.

    PMID: 28076496BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Interventions

Vidrion-R

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Rafael G Lund, PhD

    Federal University of Pelotas

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2015

First Posted

March 4, 2015

Study Start

April 2, 2014

Primary Completion

April 1, 2015

Study Completion

April 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

After completing the study, the 20 volunteers continued to be served sporadically at the regular dentistry service of the Faculty of Dentistry of Pelotas, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel).