Evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity Using Glass Ionomer Cements
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cements: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the desensitizing efficacies of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional glass ionomer cement Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) at 2-year follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Apr 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 17, 2020
August 1, 2020
12 months
February 22, 2015
August 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Scores as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Tactile and air blast tests to evaluate pain with VAS
Change from Baseline in Pain Scores at 20 minutes; at 7, 15, 21, 30 days; and after 3, 6, 12, 24 months.
Study Arms (2)
Clinpro XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)
EXPERIMENTALResin-modified glass ionomer cement
Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK)
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional glass ionomer cement
Interventions
Clinpro XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)
Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female subjects between 18 and 70 years old
- At least 2 teeth with dentin hypersensitivity in two different hemiarchs
- Dental elements with hypersensitivity without any pulp alteration
- People who are not taking any medication and women who are not pregnant
- Patients without eating disorders or very acidic diets.
You may not qualify if:
- Teeth with hypersensitivity that presented extensive or unsatisfactory restorations, fractures, periodontal alterations, caries lesions, orthodontic brackets, endodontic treatments, pulp alterations.
- Subjects who received any desensitizing therapy during the last 3 months
- Subjects being under analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs at the time of the study
- Teeth with hypersensitivity and non-carious cervical lesions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Lund RG, Silva AF, Piva E, Da Rosa WL, Heckmann SS, Demarco FF. Clinical evaluation of two desensitizing treatments in southern Brazil: A 3-month follow-up. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1469-74. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.770919. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
PMID: 24180588BACKGROUNDBrannstrom M. The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and pulp fluid: its significance in relation to dentinal sensitivity. Annu Meet Am Inst Oral Biol. 1966;23:219. No abstract available.
PMID: 5228880BACKGROUNDda Rosa WL, Lund RG, Piva E, da Silva AF. The effectiveness of current dentin desensitizing agents used to treat dental hypersensitivity: a systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2013 Jul;44(7):535-46. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a29610.
PMID: 23616976BACKGROUNDQue K, Guo B, Jia Z, Chen Z, Yang J, Gao P. A cross-sectional study: non-carious cervical lesions, cervical dentine hypersensitivity and related risk factors. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Jan;40(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02342.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
PMID: 22882712BACKGROUNDOrchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jul;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321.
PMID: 16803826BACKGROUNDMadruga MM, Silva AF, Rosa WL, Piva E, Lund RG. Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jan 5;31:e3. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0003.
PMID: 28076496BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rafael G Lund, PhD
Federal University of Pelotas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2015
First Posted
March 4, 2015
Study Start
April 2, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
After completing the study, the 20 volunteers continued to be served sporadically at the regular dentistry service of the Faculty of Dentistry of Pelotas, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel).