Effectiveness of a Homecare Dentin Hypersensitivity Gel
ECR
EFFECTIVENESS OF A HOMECARE DESENSITIZER FOR PATIENTS WITH DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a desensitizing gel for topical and home use in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) through a randomized clinical trial, double-blind, with three parallel treatment. Methods: 126 subjects were divided into three groups: placebo gel (PG), test gel (TG) (5% sodium fluoride, potassium oxalate 5%, strontium chloride 10%) and sodium fluoride gel (2% FG ). The measurement of DH was performed by a single examiner blinded by the visual analog scale (VAS) after tactile, thermal and osmotic stimuli in the Baseline, 7, 15 and 30 days.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2009
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2014
CompletedMay 1, 2014
April 1, 2014
3.6 years
April 25, 2014
April 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
dentine hypersensitivity with visual analog scale (VAS) following tactile, thermal and osmotic stimulus
The DH was measured on 7 days after products use. It was evaluated on the buccal surface of the tooth selected using a visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after application of the air jet, created with the triple syringe, at a distance of 10 mm from the tooth for 10 seconds, in the region of exposure root. The touch test was performed on the exposed root surface by applying a light force with blunt probe perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth for 10 seconds. Finally, we applied the test with water jet, using the perpendicular triple syringe and spaced 10 mm of the tooth to be tested. DH evaluations were performed with an interval of 1 minute to minimize interactions between examinations. All reviews of DH were conducted by a single trained examiner (M.M.).
Change from Baseline in VAS Scale at 7 days.
dentine hypersensitivity with visual analog scale (VAS) following tactile, thermal and osmotic stimulus
he DH was measured on 15 days after products use. It was evaluated on the buccal surface of the tooth selected using a visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after application of the air jet, created with the triple syringe, at a distance of 10 mm from the tooth for 10 seconds, in the region of exposure root. The touch test was performed on the exposed root surface by applying a light force with blunt probe perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth for 10 seconds. Finally, we applied the test with water jet, using the perpendicular triple syringe and spaced 10 mm of the tooth to be tested. DH evaluations were performed with an interval of 1 minute to minimize interactions between examinations. All reviews of DH were conducted by a single trained examiner (M.M.).
Change from Baseline in VAS Scale at 15 days.
dentine hypersensitivity with visual analog scale (VAS) following tactile, thermal and osmotic stimulus
The DH was measured on 30 days after products use. It was evaluated on the buccal surface of the tooth selected using a visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after application of the air jet, created with the triple syringe, at a distance of 10 mm from the tooth for 10 seconds, in the region of exposure root. The touch test was performed on the exposed root surface by applying a light force with blunt probe perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth for 10 seconds. Finally, we applied the test with water jet, using the perpendicular triple syringe and spaced 10 mm of the tooth to be tested. DH evaluations were performed with an interval of 1 minute to minimize interactions between examinations. All reviews of DH were conducted by a single trained examiner (M.M.).
Change from Baseline in VAS Scale at 30 days.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Irritation
Change from Baseline in possible adverse reactions at 7 days.
Irritation
Change from Baseline in possible adverse reactions at 15 days.
Irritation
Change from Baseline in possible adverse reactions at 30 days.
Allergy
Change from Baseline in possible adverse reactions at 07 days.
Allergy
Change from Baseline in possible adverse reactions at 15 days.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORIndividuals that were randomized for treatment " A " . The product tested were always delivered in a transparent plastic syringe with 10 mls marking identified by the letters " A " . The syringes were given to individuals in an opaque plastic envelope sealed and delivered along with a reminder of the correct way to use the products. Guidance for the use of substances was to make application with a new toothbrush, 1 time a day (at night, before bed, after brushing the teeth) with the product received, for 1 minute and the amount of 0.25 g (0.5 ml) of the product as the demarcation the syringe. It was recommended that after using the products, they were expelled without rinsing the oral cavity with water (Placebo gel).
Experimental gel
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals that were randomized for treatment " B " - The product was delivered in a transparent plastic syringe with 10 mls identified by the letter " B ". The syringes were given to individuals in an opaque plastic envelope sealed and with a reminder of the correct way to use the products. Guidance for the use of substances was to make application with a new toothbrush, 1 time a day (at night, before bed, after brushing the teeth) with the product received, for 1 minute and the amount of 0.25 g (0.5 ml) of the product as the demarcation the syringe. It was recommended that after using the products, they were expelled without rinsing the oral cavity with water (5% sodium fluoride, potassium oxalate 5%, strontium chloride 10% ) .
Positive control
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals that were randomized for treatment " C " . The product tested were always delivered in a transparent plastic syringe with 10 mls marking identified by the letters " C " . The syringes were given to individuals in an opaque plastic envelope sealed and delivered along with a reminder of the correct way to use the products. Guidance for the use of substances was to make application with a new toothbrush, 1 time a day (at night, before bed, after brushing the teeth) with the product received, for 1 minute and the amount of 0.25 g (0.5 ml) of the product as the demarcation the syringe. It was recommended that after using the products, they were expelled without rinsing the oral cavity with water (Fluoride neutral NaF gel 2 %).
Interventions
Manipulated at Novaderme ®, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Manipulated at Novaderme ®, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
The product had similar appearance and viscosity than others.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible individuals who had been considered with a tooth with gingival recession and DH caused by at least one of the stimuli, heat (air), tactile (probe) and/or osmotic (water). If the subject submit more than one tooth with DH, the most sensitive element to the air test was chosen as the unit of analysis. Molars were excluded from analysis.
You may not qualify if:
- Ineligible individuals were characterized by exhibiting one of the following conditions:
- Had undergone periodontal surgery in the last three months;
- Chronic use of anti-inflammatory and analgesic,
- Receiving specific treatment for DH,
- Presented hypersensitivity to any of the compounds used in the study;
- Pregnant or lactating;
- Systemic conditions that could cause or predispose the development of DH (oesophageal reflux);
- subjects whose diet submit excess acidic substances;
- Persons whose tooth with DH present carie cavities, fractures, pulp necrosis or some pulp symptoms diagnosed through pulp sensitivity tests to cold;
- Present congenital defects in enamel or dentin;
- Present extensive restoration carried out in the last three months
- Present dental crowns and abutment of fixed or removable prosthesis.
- Patients who did not returned calls for the achievement of sensitivity tests in the stipulated period;
- Individuals that did not use adequadely the product;
- Subjects that desist from participating in the search, for any reason.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidade Federal de Santa Marialead
- Franciscan University Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Fabricio Batistin Zanatta
Santa Maria, Rua Floriano Peixoto--, 97015-372, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fabricio B Zanatta, pHD
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
- STUDY CHAIR
ALESSANDRA P GRELLMANN, DS
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
- STUDY CHAIR
ROBERTO C VIANNA SANTOS, pHD
Centro Universitário Franciscano
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orientador principal
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2014
First Posted
May 1, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 1, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04