A Clinical Study of Two Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatments Used With Normal Oral Hygiene
A Randomized Clinical Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatments Used With Normal Oral Hygiene
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of normal oral hygiene with two different marketed dentifrices, on longer term dentinal hypersensitivity response following use of potassium oxalate desensitizers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 9, 2020
CompletedSeptember 9, 2020
September 1, 2020
2 months
August 12, 2014
August 30, 2019
September 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline Air Challenge
The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows: 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subjects responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.
60 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale
60 days
Study Arms (2)
oxalate liquid & gel plus SnF2 paste
OTHERPotassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Stannous fluoride paste, self applied
oxalate liquid & gel plus NaF paste
OTHERPotassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Sodium fluoride paste, self applied
Interventions
Toothpaste used by subject
Professionally applied (liquid) and self applied (gel)
Toothpaste used by subject
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be at least 18 years of age
- Provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form
- Complete a confidentiality disclosure agreement
- Be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee
- Have at least one tooth with a Schiff sensitivity score of at least 1 in response to the air challenge.
You may not qualify if:
- Self-reported pregnancy or nursing
- Severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession
- Active treatment of periodontitis
- Fixed facial orthodontic appliances
- A history of kidney stones
- Known allergies to the following ingredients; aqua, glycerin, cellulose gum, dipotassium oxalate, carbomer, sodium hydroxide, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate
- Any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study
- An inability to undergo any study procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chad J Anderson DMD Inc
Fresno, California, 93730, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trial Manager
- Organization
- The Procter & Gamble Company
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chad J Anderson, MS, DMD
Chad J Anderson DMD Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2014
First Posted
August 20, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 9, 2020
Results First Posted
September 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09