Fluoride Varnish X Glass Ionomer Sealant on Cervical Dentin Hypersensitivity
Efficacy of a Fluoride Varnish and a Glass Ionomer Sealant on Cervical Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) can be defined as acute, short-duration pain from open dentin tubules in exposed dentin. The symptom of DH is subjective and varies from patient to patient and may present as mild discomfort or as a high-intensity pain, which can affect the individual's quality of life, interfering with their eating and hygiene habits. One approach to treatment would be the use of agents that chemically desensitize sensory nerves, blocking the transmission of nerve stimuli to the central nervous system. The effectiveness of desensitizing treatments is influenced by several factors present in the oral cavity, which can contribute to a greater effect of these agents but can also be responsible for removing them from the dental surface. To date, studies have been carried out in the short term, not exceeding an average period of 12 weeks, so there is no consensus on the technique or agent that will guarantee the most effective and lasting effect against DH, not even the ideal period for reapplication. Thus, more studies are needed to assess the clinical behavior of desensitizing products on the market, especially the most recent releases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clinically compare the effectiveness of different office treatments for DH, being ClinproTM White Varnish, ClinproTM XT Varnish, and a control group (placebo) through pain assessment with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), after stimulation with air from the triple syringe.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedOctober 20, 2020
October 1, 2020
2.7 years
October 11, 2020
October 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the dentin hypersensitivity
The evaluation was performed with the use of Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The volunteers pointed out on the VAS (ranging from 0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain) the whole number, which best described his perception of pain at the moment. The primary outcome was the difference between the Visual Analog Scale values obtained in the baseline and 4 weeks after the treatment.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Dentin hypersensitivity
baseline, 15 minutes after the treatments, 1 week and 4 weeks.
Change in the dentin hypersensitivity
3 months and 6 months
Study Arms (3)
ClinproTM White Varnish
ACTIVE COMPARATORApplication of ClinproTM White Varnish containing sodium fluoride (5%) and Tricalcium phosphate (TCP). A technology that allows calcium and phosphate ions to coexist with fluoride ions separately, forming a more resistant mineral on the tooth surface (3M ESPE Clinpro White Varnish; 3M ESPE Clinpro 5000).
ClinproTM XT Varnish
ACTIVE COMPARATORApplication of ClinproTM XT Varnish, a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant. Creates a protective layer on exposed dentin, which is durable and has the ability to release fluoride, calcium and phosphate into the surroundings. (3M ESPE Clinpro XT Varnish).
Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants who were part of the placebo group continuously used only the conventional toothpaste provided in the oral hygiene kit during the initial four weeks of the research and received a simulated treatment.
Interventions
Following the manufacturer's recommendations, it was not necessary to moisten or dry the treated surface beforehand or afterwards. The product was dispensed and manipulated for 15 s until a homogeneous mixture was obtained, applied with a micro brush, flowing into interproximal areas, and quickly adhering to the tooth surface in the presence of saliva.
Following the manufacturer's recommendations, prophylaxis and prior drying of the treated surface was carried out, the product was also dispensed and manipulated for 15 s until a homogeneous mixture was obtained, applied with a micro brush and light-cured for 20 s.
4 weeks after the simulation of the treatment application, participants in the placebo group received DH treatment with the product that had the best effect in the first 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Minimum age of 18 years old;
- Presented good general health;
- Presented at least one tooth with DH reported in the cervical region, which has a graded sensitivity of 4 or more on the VAS scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Presented active caries lesions or with defective restorations in the tooth to be analyzed;
- Presented enough dentin loss that required restorative treatment or periodontal surgery;
- Volunteers who underwent any professional desensitizing treatment in the last 6 months;
- Volunteers who used desensitizing pastes in the 3 months;
- Volunteers who were using anti-inflammatory or analgesic drugs at the time of recruitment;
- Volunteers were are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo
São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
Machado AC, Maximiano V, Yoshida ML, Freitas JG, Mendes FM, Aranha ACC, Scaramucci T. Efficacy of a calcium-phosphate/fluoride varnish and ionomeric sealant on cervical dentin hypersensitivity: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Jan;49(1):62-70. doi: 10.1111/joor.13270. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
PMID: 34676918DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taís Scaramucci Forlin, Assistant Professor
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 1, 2019
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10