4 Versus 6 Courses of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in LACC Patients Previously Treated With NACT Plus Radical Surgery
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of 4 Versus 6 Courses of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Previously Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radical Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
215
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators primary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness in term of Overall Survival (OS) and disease free interval (DFI) of two different platinum-based chemotherapic regimen (3 and 6 cycles) for treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC) (IB2-IIB) previously treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radical Surgery (NACT+RS). The secondary outcome was to evaluate and compare safety, in term of toxicity profile, of the two treatment options.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2015
CompletedFebruary 19, 2015
February 1, 2015
5.9 years
January 21, 2015
February 18, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
overall survival
To evaluate the effectiveness in term of overall survival of two different platinum-based chemotherapic regimen (4 and 6 cycles) for treatment of LACC (IB2-IIB) previously treated with NACT+RS.
up to 6 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
safety:to evaluate and compare safety, in term of toxicity profile, of the two adjuvant treatment options.
up to 6 years
disease free interval
up to 6 years
Study Arms (2)
Group A to administer 4 cycles
EXPERIMENTALIn Group A, all patients received 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy every three weeks according to the scheme Cisplatin 100 mg/mq and Paclitaxel 175 mg/mq.
Group B to administre 6 cycles
EXPERIMENTALIn Group B, all patients received instead 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy every three weeks according to the same chemotherapic regimen.
Interventions
In Group A, all patients received 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy every three weeks according to the scheme Cisplatin 100 mg/mq and Paclitaxel 175 mg/mq.
In Group B, all patients received 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy every three weeks according to the scheme Cisplatin 100 mg/mq and Paclitaxel 175 mg/mq.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with squamous cell, adenosquamous or adenocarcinoma of the cervix
- Stage IB2-IIB according to the Inyernational Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)
- age between 18 and 75 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
- normal cardiac and respiratory functions
- absence of secondary malignancies
- no previous surgical, chemotherapic and/or radiotherapic treatment for secondary malignancies
- informed consent obtained from the patient.
You may not qualify if:
- histological confirmation of papillary serous, mucinous, clear cell, squamous cell, mixed and undifferentiated carcinoma of the uterus
- abnormal hepatic function (transaminases \> 2.5 x upper limit, serum bilirubin \> 1,5 x upper limit)
- abnormal renal function (creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min and/or serum creatinine\>2.0 mg/100 mL) function
- abnormal bone marrow function (absolute neutrophil count \<1,5 x 109/L or platelet count \< 100 x 109/L or hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL
- severe or uncontrolled infection, other systemic diseases or mental illness; and
- pregnant women. Clinical staging was performed according to the NCCN criteria, and included pelvic examination, cervical biopsy, abdomen-pelvis Computed Tomography, chest X-ray; examination under anesthesia, cystoscopy and/or proctoscopy if clinically indicated (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Clinical Practicw Guidelines in Oncology. Cervical Cancer, Version 2.2015)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
campus bio-medico of Rome
Rome, 00128, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roberto Angioli, Professor
Campus Bio Medico of Rome
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Roberto Angioli
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2015
First Posted
February 19, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 19, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02