Study Stopped
The study was stopped earlier than planned due to safety concerns about high levels of calcium in the blood of the participants
Multicenter,Single-arm Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, & Pharmacokinetics of Denosumab in Children w/ OI
OI
To Evaluate the Effect of Denosumab in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-score at 12 Months, as Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), in Children 2 to 17 Years of Age (at the Time of Screening) on a 3-Month Dosing Regimen With OI
2 other identifiers
interventional
153
13 countries
49
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study in children 2 to 17 years of age with OI to evaluate efficacy and safety of denosumab.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3
49 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 26, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 28, 2022
CompletedDecember 28, 2022
November 1, 2022
6.8 years
January 28, 2015
September 26, 2022
November 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-Score at 12 Months
Lumbar spine BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The results were then converted to Z-scores. The Z-score indicated the number of standard deviations away from the reference population and a score of 0 is equal to the mean. Positive changes from Baseline indicated an improvement in lumbar spine BMD.
Baseline and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD Z-score at 6 Months
Baseline and 6 months
Change From Baseline in Proximal Femur BMD Z-score at 6 and 12 Months
Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 X-ray Confirmed Long Bone or New and Worsening Vertebral Fracture
Q6M Dosing Regimen: Last 12 months of treatment (median treatment duration was 730.0 days); Q3M Dosing Regimen: Day 1 up to 12 months
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 X-ray Confirmed New and Worsening Vertebral Fracture
Q6M Dosing Regimen: Last 12 months of treatment (median treatment duration was 730.0 days); Q3M Dosing Regimen: Day 1 up to 12 months
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 X-ray Confirmed New Vertebral Fracture
Q6M Dosing Regimen: Last 12 months of treatment (median treatment duration was 730.0 days); Q3M Dosing Regimen: Day 1 up to 12 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Denosumab
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received denosumab 1 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 60 mg) subcutaneously every 6 months (Q6M) for up to 36 months. Early efficacy and PK data from Q6M dosing supported adjustment of the dosing regimen from Q6M to every 3 months (Q3M). Participants enrolled and still receiving denosumab were transitioned from Q6M to Q3M dosing schedule. Participants could transition to Q3M dosing schedule up to and including the date they attended for their month 36 visit under the Q6M dosing regimen. Those participants received denosumab during the Q3M dosing regimen for 12 months. Participants who transition to Q3M at month 18 of the Q6M dosing regimen received denosumab Q3M for up to 18 months.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of OI defined as a clinical history consistent with type I-IV OI Clinical severity of OI as defined by 2 or more prevalent vertebral compression fractures; OR1 prevalent vertebral compression fracture and 1 or more nonvertebral fractures within the previous 2 years; OR 3 or more fractures within the previous 2 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements for frequent calcium and phosphorus monitoring for 14 days after the first dose of denosumab (only applies to the first 5 subjects age 11 to17 enrolled in the study and the first 5 subjects of any age meeting the criteria for increased bone turnover
- Currently unhealed fracture or osteotomy as defined by orthopedic opinion
- Osteotomy within 5 months of screening
- Evidence of untreated oral cavities or oral infections
- Recent or planned invasive dental procedure
- Surgical tooth extraction which has not healed by screening
- History of an electrophoresis pattern inconsistent with type I to IV OI
- History of genetic testing results inconsistent with type I to IV OI
- Abnormalities of the following per central laboratory reference ranges at screening: Serum albumin corrected calcium \< lower limit of normal (LLN) Serum vitamin D \< 20 ng/mL; re-screening for Vitamin D level \< 20 ng/mL will be allowed, after adequate supplementation
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Total bilirubin (TBL) \> 1.5 x ULN (subjects with Gilbert syndrome are eligible)
- Serum phosphorus \< LLN
- Serum alkaline phosphatase \> 20% above the ULN or \> 20% below the LLN
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated bythe Schwartz equation at screening) Evidence of any of the following: Current hyperthyroidism (unless well-controlled on stable antithyroid therapy)
- Current clinical hypothyroidism (unless well-controlled on stable thyroid replacement therapy)
- +20 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (49)
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Research Site
Torrance, California, 90502, United States
Research Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Research Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
Research Site
Wilmington, Delaware, 19803, United States
Research Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
Research Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Research Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Research Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Research Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Research Site
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Research Site
Subiaco, Western Australia, 6008, Australia
Research Site
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Research Site
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Research Site
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Research Site
Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
Research Site
Sofia, 1784, Bulgaria
Research Site
Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
Research Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 0A9, Canada
Research Site
Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia
Research Site
Pardubice, 532 03, Czechia
Research Site
Pilsen, 305 99, Czechia
Research Site
Prague, 140 59, Czechia
Research Site
Zlín, 762 75, Czechia
Research Site
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Research Site
Paris, 75012, France
Research Site
Paris, 75743, France
Research Site
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France
Research Site
Toulouse, 31059, France
Research Site
Cologne, 50931, Germany
Research Site
Budapest, 1094, Hungary
Research Site
Roma, 00161, Italy
Research Site
Verona, 37126, Italy
Research Site
Bialystok, 15-274, Poland
Research Site
Lodz, 91-738, Poland
Research Site
Rzeszów, 35-301, Poland
Research Site
Warsaw, 04-730, Poland
Research Site
Esplugues de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08950, Spain
Research Site
Getafe, Madrid, 28905, Spain
Research Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46026, Spain
Research Site
Birmingham, B4 6NH, United Kingdom
Research Site
Bristol, BS2 8AE, United Kingdom
Research Site
Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
Research Site
Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2015
First Posted
February 2, 2015
Study Start
June 24, 2015
Primary Completion
March 26, 2022
Study Completion
March 26, 2022
Last Updated
December 28, 2022
Results First Posted
December 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request