Study Stopped
For business reasons / product no longer available from Sponsor
Clinical Evaluation of GENEX® DS in Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF GENEX® DS IN INSTRUMENTED POSTEROLATERAL FUSION
1 other identifier
observational
2
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The overall goal of this clinical study is to characterize the fusion rate of geneX® ds bone graft substitute in comparison to autograft, which is considered the gold standard for posterolateral fusion. Assessments are made using AP and Lateral x-rays, F/E x-rays, and CT scans geneX® ds has been cleared by the FDA for use in these procedures; however this study will allow more detailed characterization of geneX® ds performance in the long-term (1 year). By using the patient as their own control, direct comparison to autograft can be performed while minimizing other variables.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Dec 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedApril 19, 2018
April 1, 2018
2 years
December 8, 2014
April 17, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fusion
Fusion will be assessed by a single, independent radiologist using study required x-rays (AP, Lateral, Flexion-Extension) and CT scans. On xray, fusion will be graded for bridging bone and lucencies. Flexion extension x-rays will also be evaluated to determine translational and angular motion. For these evaluations, fusion is defined as translational motion \< 3mm and angular motion \< 5º.CT assessments of fusion will include qualitative evaluation of the continuity of trabecular bone between the transverse processes, cortication at the peripheral edges of the fusion masses, and the absence of identifiable radiographic clefts. Quantitative volumetric measurements of the fusion mass will be performed by outlining the fusion area in each cross-sectional slice and summing all slices.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complications
1 year
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
The subject population will include adult (skeletally mature) men and women with spinal conditions for which instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) has been indicated as a course of treatment. Such spinal conditions may include symptomatic degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis (Grade I or II), or lumbar stenosis. The study is limited to those patients requiring instrumented PLF at one or two levels only. Subjects who are undergoing other spinal procedures during the same surgery (such as interbody fusions) are also eligible.
You may qualify if:
- Men or women 18-75 years of age
- Have ability to understand the requirements of the study, to provide written informed consent, and to comply with the study protocol
- Have a spinal condition of the lumbar spine (L1-S1) requiring instrumented posterolateral fusion at one or two levels
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing instrumented fusion for trauma, tumor, psuedoarthrosis, or same- - level recurrent stenosis
- Patients where placing graft material on both sides (posterolateral gutters) is not possible, for example in the case of a complete facetectomy
- Patients requiring instrumented fusion in the cervical or thoracic spine
- Extraspinal cause of back pain such as trauma, infection, instrumentation failure, or neoplasm
- Severe degenerative bone disease
- Hypercalcemia
- Active local or systemic infection
- Morbid obesity defined as BMI \> 40
- Patients who are pregnant / able to become pregnant and not following a reliable contraceptive method
- Uncooperative patients who can't or won't follow post-operative instructions including individuals who abuse drugs or alcohol
- Anatomy or other factors that prohibit safe surgical access to the surgical site
- Allergy or sensitivity to any component of the treatment procedure
- Inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site
- Inadequate bone stock or bone quality
- Fever or leukocytosis
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Spine Wavelead
Study Sites (2)
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, 20284, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2014
First Posted
December 15, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04