NCT02317185

Brief Summary

The overall goal of this clinical study is to characterize the fusion rate of geneX® ds bone graft substitute in comparison to autograft, which is considered the gold standard for posterolateral fusion. Assessments are made using AP and Lateral x-rays, F/E x-rays, and CT scans geneX® ds has been cleared by the FDA for use in these procedures; however this study will allow more detailed characterization of geneX® ds performance in the long-term (1 year). By using the patient as their own control, direct comparison to autograft can be performed while minimizing other variables.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 15, 2014

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

April 19, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 8, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Fusion

    Fusion will be assessed by a single, independent radiologist using study required x-rays (AP, Lateral, Flexion-Extension) and CT scans. On xray, fusion will be graded for bridging bone and lucencies. Flexion extension x-rays will also be evaluated to determine translational and angular motion. For these evaluations, fusion is defined as translational motion \< 3mm and angular motion \< 5º.CT assessments of fusion will include qualitative evaluation of the continuity of trabecular bone between the transverse processes, cortication at the peripheral edges of the fusion masses, and the absence of identifiable radiographic clefts. Quantitative volumetric measurements of the fusion mass will be performed by outlining the fusion area in each cross-sectional slice and summing all slices.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Complications

    1 year

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The subject population will include adult (skeletally mature) men and women with spinal conditions for which instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) has been indicated as a course of treatment. Such spinal conditions may include symptomatic degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis (Grade I or II), or lumbar stenosis. The study is limited to those patients requiring instrumented PLF at one or two levels only. Subjects who are undergoing other spinal procedures during the same surgery (such as interbody fusions) are also eligible.

You may qualify if:

  • Men or women 18-75 years of age
  • Have ability to understand the requirements of the study, to provide written informed consent, and to comply with the study protocol
  • Have a spinal condition of the lumbar spine (L1-S1) requiring instrumented posterolateral fusion at one or two levels

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing instrumented fusion for trauma, tumor, psuedoarthrosis, or same- - level recurrent stenosis
  • Patients where placing graft material on both sides (posterolateral gutters) is not possible, for example in the case of a complete facetectomy
  • Patients requiring instrumented fusion in the cervical or thoracic spine
  • Extraspinal cause of back pain such as trauma, infection, instrumentation failure, or neoplasm
  • Severe degenerative bone disease
  • Hypercalcemia
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Morbid obesity defined as BMI \> 40
  • Patients who are pregnant / able to become pregnant and not following a reliable contraceptive method
  • Uncooperative patients who can't or won't follow post-operative instructions including individuals who abuse drugs or alcohol
  • Anatomy or other factors that prohibit safe surgical access to the surgical site
  • Allergy or sensitivity to any component of the treatment procedure
  • Inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site
  • Inadequate bone stock or bone quality
  • Fever or leukocytosis
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, 10021, United States

Location

Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates

Charlotte, North Carolina, 20284, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationSpondylolisthesisConstriction, Pathologic

Interventions

Bone Transplantation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesSpondylolysisSpondylosisPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tissue TransplantationCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyBiological TherapyTherapeuticsOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeTransplantation

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2014

First Posted

December 15, 2014

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

April 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations