NCT02087982

Brief Summary

The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process to determine the medical, psychological, and functional capabilities of an elderly person, in order to develop a coordinated and integrated plan for treatment. It represents the first stage of the most appropriate care for elderly people who are frail or who cannot perform at least three daily tasks unaided. It has been shown that the integration of CGA in the decision-making and care management at hospital improves inpatient's health and functional status, and reduces mortality rate and healthcare expenditures. The effects of CGA in daily practice of general practitioners remain unknown. Implementation of a systematic CGA for every older old community-dwellers performed by a general practitioner remains yet difficult because of number of issues. First, although the number of older old community-dwellers keeps increasing, the number of health care professional with geriatric skills does not. Second, CGA is a complex and time-consuming process. Third, CGA requires a multidisciplinary geriatric team that cannot support alone the care of all frail older old community-dwellers due to their limited number. An implication of non-geriatricians in CGA is therefore required. Recently, it was confirmed that CGA cannot be applied to all older adults, and that the best compromise could be the use of a two-step approach. The first step is the identification by non-geriatricians of elderly inpatients at high risk of adverse outcomes using a screening tool, and the second step is a CGA by geriatricians with a diagnosis purpose. None of existing tools used for screening is adapted to the population of elderly people who visit general practitioners.Thus, healthcare professionals working in ED need a simple, standardized and brief geriatric assessment (BGA) to identify as soon as possible frail older old community-dwellers requiring specialized geriatric care. The investigators hypothesized that a BGA older old community-dwellers carried out by a general practitioner could predict the adverse health events (i.e. hospitalization, institutionalisation, medical consultations and death) occurring during a 6-months follow-up period before the evaluation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
840

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 28, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2014

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 20, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

October 28, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of non planned hospitalization by subjects

    The BGA test will include the following criteria: * age, * sex, * the ability to give the current month and year, * the occurrence of falls during the last 6 months, * the presence of more than 4 classes of prescribed drugs, * the presence of professional or other assistance help at home. All following adverse health events occurring during a 6-months period of follow-up : * Hospitalization, * Institutionalisation, * Medical consultations, * Death.

    Hospitalization between inclusion and follow up to 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of subjects' institutionnalized

    Institutionnalization between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months

  • Number of dead subjects

    Death between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Number of non planned consultations by subjects

    Number of non planned consultations between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months

Study Arms (1)

Seniors

The study will be based on a 6-months assessment period, with two consecutive monitoring visits on enrollment. Patient follow-up after 3 months will be conducted by telephone and monitoring after 6 months will be carried out as part of a routine consultation. Each subject will have a BGA (Brief Geriatric assesment).

Eligibility Criteria

Age80 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

adults aged 80 and over

You may qualify if:

  • the patient is aged 80 or more,
  • the patient comes to a normal medical consultation without any acute health problem,
  • the patient lives at home,
  • the patient is able to respond to questions he is asked,
  • the patient has given his agreement to answer questions during the initial consultation, to answer further questions by telephone after 3 months and to return in 6 months for a further consultation,
  • the life expectancy of the patient as estimated by the primary care practitioner is greater than 6 months.
  • the patient has french nationality and is a member of a national Social Security scheme.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients are ineligible if :
  • if a close relation of the patient does not agree the patient to be part of the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nord Pas de Calais

Leers, 59115, France

Location

Study Officials

  • Gilles Berrut, PhD

    Nantes University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2013

First Posted

March 14, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 20, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-12

Locations