Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
For endotracheal entubation in children mostly Miller and Macintosh blades have been used. On the other hand Truview EVO2 laringoscopes can maintain a better laryngeal view without having a direct sight of the airway and without having to align oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. The aim of this study is to compare the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of intubation difficulty score, time to intubation and intubation quality score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2014
CompletedFebruary 24, 2014
February 1, 2014
9 months
February 20, 2014
February 21, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ease laryngoscopy in children
during laryngoscopy
Study Arms (2)
Truview EVO2 laryngoscope
patients intubated withTruview EVO2 laryngoscope
Macintosh laryngoscope
patients intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope
Interventions
intubation criterias withMacintosh laryngoscopein pediatric patients
intubation criterias with Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in pediatric patients
Eligibility Criteria
pediatric patients undergoing surgery which needs intubation
You may qualify if:
- aged 2-12 pediatric patients
You may not qualify if:
- any allergy
- difficult airway history
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Ankara University
Ankara, 06550, Turkey (Türkiye)
Ankara University, Pediatric Surgery
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- specialist anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2014
First Posted
February 24, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 24, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02