Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes by Using the Videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Tracheal intubation techniques that avoid or minimize pharyngolaryngeal stimulation might attenuate the hemodynamic stress response. Tracheal intubation using video laryngoscope needs comparatively less airway manipulation so, the investigators expect less hemodynamic response while using videolaryngoscope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 9, 2015
June 1, 2015
3 months
September 28, 2015
December 8, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Blood pressure changes during tracheal intubation ( mmHg ) ,
At baseline, 1 minute before intubation, and 1,2,3,4 and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Heart rate changes during tracheal intubation (beats per minute)
At baseline, 1 minute before intubation, and 1,2,3,4 and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation
ST segment elevation in electrocardiogram indicating myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation
At baseline, 1 and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Arrhythmic changes in electrocardiogram during tracheal intubation
At baseline, 1 and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation.
Study Arms (2)
videolaryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients intubated by using the videolaryngoscopy
Macintosh laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients intubated by using the Macintosh laryngoscope
Interventions
patients intubated by using the Macintosh laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status II-III,
- aged over 65 years,
- controlled hypertensive patients,
- scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting.
You may not qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status IV,
- ejection fraction \< 40%,
- any anatomical abnormality in head, neck or face,
- Mallampati score of IV,
- history of difficult intubation or laryngoscopy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Antalya, 07070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Kihara S, Brimacombe J, Yaguchi Y, Watanabe S, Taguchi N, Komatsuzaki T. Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):890-895. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048706.15720.C9.
PMID: 12598280BACKGROUNDKanaide M, Fukusaki M, Tamura S, Takada M, Miyako M, Sumikawa K. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses during tracheal intubation using a lightwand device (Trachlight) in elderly patients with hypertension. J Anesth. 2003;17(3):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-003-0166-8.
PMID: 12911202BACKGROUNDXue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Li CW, Liu KP. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Jun;19(4):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.004.
PMID: 17572317RESULTXue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Sun HY, Xu YC, Liu Y. Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;23(6):522-6. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000299. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
PMID: 16507195RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nilgun Kavrut Ozturk, MD
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2015
First Posted
October 1, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 9, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06