Does Glidescope Video Laryngoscope is Related to Less Hemodynamic Response?
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses to Endotracheal Intubation With Glidescope Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation causes significant hemodynamic response and thus presents an increased risk for patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery. Prevention or reduction of this increment is important for hemodynamic control. In this randomized single blind study, the aim of this study is to compare the hemodynamic responses of two different laryngoscopy techniques with Glidescope and Macintosh laryngoscope in coronary cardiac bypass surgery patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedJune 14, 2017
March 1, 2016
1.4 years
February 27, 2016
June 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in systolic blood pressure
invasive blood pressure (mmHg) monitoring
5 minutes; At start of laryngoscopy and after 30th seconds, 60th seconds, 90th seconds, 120th seconds, 3rd minutes, 4th minutes, 5th minutes
Change in heart rate
Heart rate (beats per minute) will be measured before induction, and throughout and after laryngoscopy
5 minutes; At start of laryngoscopy and after 30th seconds, 60th seconds, 90th seconds, 120th seconds, 3rd minutes, 4th minutes, 5th minutes
Change in diastolic blood pressure
invasive blood pressure (mmHg) monitoring
5 minutes; At start of laryngoscopy and after 30th seconds, 60th seconds, 90th seconds, 120th seconds, 3rd minutes, 4th minutes, 5th minutes
Change in mean arterial pressure
invasive blood pressure (mmHg) monitoring
5 minutes;At start of laryngoscopy and after 30th seconds, 60th seconds, 90th seconds, 120th seconds, 3rd minutes, 4th minutes, 5th minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Procedure time
10 minutes
Cormack lehane laryngoscopic view will be recorded
10 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Glidescope intubation
OTHERThis standard GlideScope (GS) technique involves a midline laryngoscopy followed by insertion of a styletted endotracheal tube, once an adequate view of the vocal cords is achieved.
Macintosh Laryngoscope
OTHERThis standard technique involves laryngoscopy followed by insertion of a styletted endotracheal tube, once an adequate view of the vocal cords is achieved.
Interventions
This standard GlideScope (GS) technique involves a midline laryngoscopy followed by insertion of a styletted endotracheal tube, once an adequate view of the vocal cords is achieved.
This technique involves a laryngoscopy followed by insertion of a styletted endotracheal tube, once an adequate view of the vocal cords is achieved.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical Status 2-3
- Patients undergoing elective cardiac bypass surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Difficult intubation history
- Need for Rapid sequence intubation or alternative intubation method
- Emergency procedures
- Patients that have predictive factors for difficult intubation
- Patients with permanent pacemaker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
GATA Haydarpasa Training Hospital
Istanbul, Asia, 34668, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Friedman Z, Gurevich L, Siddiqui N. The effect of a modified GlideScope intubation technique on procedure times, airway morbidity and haemodynamic response. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):229-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000339. No abstract available.
PMID: 26760401BACKGROUNDAmini S, Shakib M. Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cesarean section with general anesthesia: application of glidescope(R) videolaryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope. Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar 30;5(2):e21836. doi: 10.5812/aapm.21836. eCollection 2015 Apr.
PMID: 25866708BACKGROUNDDashti M, Amini S, Azarfarin R, Totonchi Z, Hatami M. Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope((R)) video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2014 May;3(2):e17598. doi: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.17598. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
PMID: 25478537BACKGROUNDAqil M. A study of stress response to endotracheal intubation comparing glidescope and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;30(5):1001-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.305.4788.
PMID: 25225515BACKGROUNDPournajafian AR, Ghodraty MR, Faiz SH, Rahimzadeh P, Goodarzynejad H, Dogmehchi E. Comparing GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope Regarding Hemodynamic Responses During Orotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Apr;16(4):e12334. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.12334. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
PMID: 24910788BACKGROUNDMaassen RL, Pieters BM, Maathuis B, Serroyen J, Marcus MA, Wouters P, van Zundert AA. Endotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy causes less cardiovascular response compared to classic direct laryngoscopy, in cardiac patients according a standard hospital protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63(4):181-6.
PMID: 23610856BACKGROUNDSiddiqui N, Katznelson R, Friedman Z. Heart rate/blood pressure response and airway morbidity following tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy, GlideScope and Trachlight: a randomized control trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Sep;26(9):740-5. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832b138d.
PMID: 19417675BACKGROUNDXue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Li CW, Liu KP. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Jun;19(4):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.004.
PMID: 17572317BACKGROUNDRussell T, Khan S, Elman J, Katznelson R, Cooper RM. Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):626-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07087.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
PMID: 22352799BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sezai Ozkan, Prof.
Gata Haydarpasa Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2016
First Posted
March 15, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 18, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-03