Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy.
RESPONSE-2
Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Phase IIIb Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients With Polycythemia Vera Who Are Hydroxyurea Resistant or Intolerant (Response 2)
1 other identifier
interventional
149
12 countries
48
Brief Summary
This study compared the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib to Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who were hydroxyurea (HU) resistant or intolerant and did not have a palpable spleen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Mar 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_3
48 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 20, 2021
CompletedJuly 20, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.5 years
January 14, 2014
April 6, 2021
June 29, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28
Proportion of patients achieving Hct control at Week 28 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8. Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by: * Confirmed Hct \> 45% that is at least 3 percentage points higher than the Hct obtained at Baseline Or * Confirmed Hct \> 48% The confirmation occurred 2 to 14 days subsequent to the initial observation.
Week 28
Secondary Outcomes (24)
Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28
Week 28
Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80
Week 52 and 80
Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80
Week 52 and 80
Number of Participants With Phlebotomies Over Time
Baseline to Week 260
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Visit
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260
- +19 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ruxolitinib
EXPERIMENTALRuxolitinib was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid.
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORBest Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib.
Interventions
Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib.
Ruxolitinib was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of PV according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria, Non-palpable spleen, Phlebotomy dependent, Resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea, ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Inadequate liver or renal function, Significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral infection requiring treatment, Active malignancy within the past 5 years, excluding specific skin cancers, Previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor, Being treated with any investigational agent, Women who are pregnant or nursing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (48)
Novartis Investigative Site
Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Antwerp, 2060, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Bayonne, Bayonne Cedex, 64109, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Brest, 29200, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59020, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, 06202, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75010, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68305, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Augsburg, 86150, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01307, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Jena, 07740, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Minden, 32429, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1085, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaposvár, 7400, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
Novartis Investigative Site
Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632 004, India
Novartis Investigative Site
Nahariya, 22100, Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Netanya, 42150, Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, BO, 40138, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, FI, 50134, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Rome, Lazio, 00168, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20122, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Pavia, PV, 27100, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, 10126, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Varese, VA, 21100, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03080, South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
A Coruña, Galicia, 15006, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de G.C, 35010, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Alicante, Valencia, 03010, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28046, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35040, Turkey (Türkiye)
Novartis Investigative Site
Talas / Kayseri, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Passamonti F, Palandri F, Saydam G, Callum J, Devos T, Guglielmelli P, Vannucchi AM, Zor E, Zuurman M, Gilotti G, Zhang Y, Griesshammer M. Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly (RESPONSE-2): 5-year follow up of a randomised, phase 3b study. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Jul;9(7):e480-e492. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00102-8. Epub 2022 May 18.
PMID: 35597252DERIVEDKiladjian JJ, Guglielmelli P, Griesshammer M, Saydam G, Masszi T, Durrant S, Passamonti F, Jones M, Zhen H, Li J, Gadbaw B, Perez Ronco J, Khan M, Verstovsek S. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib after and versus interferon use in the RESPONSE studies. Ann Hematol. 2018 Apr;97(4):617-627. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3225-1. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
PMID: 29396713DERIVEDPassamonti F, Griesshammer M, Palandri F, Egyed M, Benevolo G, Devos T, Callum J, Vannucchi AM, Sivgin S, Bensasson C, Khan M, Mounedji N, Saydam G. Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly (RESPONSE-2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30558-7. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
PMID: 27916398DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2014
First Posted
January 16, 2014
Study Start
March 25, 2014
Primary Completion
September 29, 2015
Study Completion
April 7, 2020
Last Updated
July 20, 2021
Results First Posted
July 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com