A Study of GWP42003 as Adjunctive Therapy in the First Line Treatment of Schizophrenia or Related Psychotic Disorder

NCT02006628 | Completed Phase 2 Results

• 2 other identifiers: GWAP12412013-000212-22
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 88
• Locations: 3 countries
• Sites: 14

Brief Summary

A study to compare the change in symptom severity in participants with schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder when treated with GWP42003 or placebo in conjunction with existing anti-psychotic therapy over a period of six weeks.

Conditions

Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia-related Psychotic Disorder

Keywords

GWP42003; Cannabinoids; Schizophrenia; CBD; Cannabidiol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

• Change From Baseline To End Of Treatment (Day 43) In Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score

  The PANSS was a 30-item medical scale completed by a trained rater that assessed the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia as well as symptoms of general psychopathology. The PANSS Total score was derived from the sum of the 30 items, which were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total score is the summed total for each of the PANSS positive symptom ('P'), negative symptom ('N'), general psychopathology symptom ('G') scores and could range from 30 to 210 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.

  Day 1 through Day 43

• Percentage Of PANSS Total Score Responders At End Of Treatment (Day 43)

  The percentage of PANSS treatment responders, defined as participants with ≥20% improvement in PANSS Total score between baseline and End of Treatment, is presented. The percentage of participants was calculated by dividing the number of participants with a ≥20% improvement in PANSS Total score (yes) by the total number of participants.

  Day 1 through Day 43

• Change From Baseline To The End Of Treatment (Day 43) In PANSS 'P' Score

  The PANSS 'P' scale measured the severity of positive symptoms, including delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations, hyperactivity, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. Individual items were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total 'P' score could range from 7 to 49 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.

  Day 1 through Day 43

• Change From Baseline To The End Of Treatment (Day 43) In PANSS 'N' Score

  The PANSS 'N' scale measured the severity of negative symptoms, including blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, and stereotyped thinking. Individual items were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total 'N' score could range from 7 to 49 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.

  Day 1 through Day 43

• Change From Baseline To The End Of Treatment (Day 43) In PANSS 'G' Score

  The PANSS 'G' scale measured the severity of general psychopathology symptoms, including somatic concern, anxiety, guilt feelings, tension, mannerisms and posturing, depression, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, disorientation, poor attention, lack of judgement and insight, disturbance of violation, poor impulse control, preoccupation, and active social avoidance. Individual items were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total 'G' score could range from 16 to 112 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.

  Day 1 through Day 43

• Change From Baseline To The End Of Treatment (Day 43) In The Scale For The Assessment Of Negative Symptoms (SANS)

  The SANS assessed 5 symptom complexes to obtain clinical ratings of negative symptoms in participants with schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder. Symptom complexes were affective blunting, alogia (impoverished thinking), avolition/apathy, anhedonia/asociality, and disturbance of attention. Assessments were conducted on a 6-point scale (0 = not at all; 5 = severe). The total score could range from 0 to 125 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.

  Day 1 through Day 43

• Change From Baseline To The End Of Treatment (Day 43) In The Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S)

  The CGI-S was a 7-point scale that required the clinician to rate the severity of a participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience of participants who had the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, participants were assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating on the following scale: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; or 7 = extremely ill. Lower scores equated to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.

  Day 1 through Day 43

• Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Values At Day 8 And End Of Treatment (Day 43)

  The CGI-I was a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much a participant's illness had improved or worsened relative the first assessment at the beginning of the intervention. This was rated on the following scale: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. Lower scores equated to improvement of symptoms.

  Day 8 through Day 43

• Change From Baseline To The End Of Treatment (Day 43) In Brief Assessment Of Cognition In Schizophrenia (BACS) Score

  The BACS was an instrument used to assess the aspects of cognition found to be most impaired and most strongly correlated with outcome in participants with schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder. The BACS consisted of 6 domains: verbal memory (score range 0 to 75), working memory (score range 0 to 28), motor speed (score range 0 to 100), verbal fluency (score \> 0, with no set maximum value), attention and speed of information processing (score range 0 to 110), and executive functions (score range 0 to 22). A score was obtained for each of the 6 domains. A composite summary score was then calculated as the arithmetic mean of the unweighted scores from the 6 domains. While there was not an upper limit on the composite score, overall, an increase in score was indicative of an improvement in cognition.

  Day 1 through Day 43

Study Arms (2)

GWP42003 1000 milligrams (mg)/day

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received GWP42003 (100 mg/milliliter \[mL\]), 5 mL twice daily (BID) administered orally, 5 mL in the morning and 5 mL in the evening for 6 weeks.

Drug: GWP42003

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants received placebo (0 mL cannabidiol \[CBD\]), volume matched to the 5 mL BID dose level, administered orally, 5 mL in the morning and 5 mL in the evening for 6 weeks.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Placebo DRUG

Placebo oral solution (0 milligrams \[mg\]/mL CBD) contained the excipients sesame oil, ethanol, sucralose, and strawberry flavoring.

Also known as: Placebo control

Placebo

GWP42003 DRUG

GWP42003 was an oral solution containing 100 mg/mL CBD dissolved in the excipients sesame oil, ethanol, sucralose and strawberry flavoring.

Also known as: Cannabidiol

GWP42003 1000 milligrams (mg)/day

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Participant gave written informed consent for participation in the study and did not require involuntary treatment.
• Participant was male or female aged 18 to 65 years.
• Participant was able (in the investigator's opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
• Participant was diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder (such as schizoaffective or schizophreniform disorder) as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Version 4.
• Participant was treated for a minimum of four-weeks and was on a stable dose of his or her current anti-psychotic (AP) medication.
• Participant showed the capacity to respond at least partially to first line AP medication in the opinion of the investigator.
• Participant remained stable on his or her dose of AP and concomitant medications for the duration of the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
• Participant was willing for his or her name to be notified to the responsible authorities for participation in this study, as applicable in individual countries.
• Participant was willing to allow his or her primary care practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.

You may not qualify if:

• Participant had any known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP).
• Participant had a Positive and Negative Symptom Scale total score of \<60 at Day 1.
• Participant presented with a current clinical picture and/or history that is consistent with:
• i. delirium or dementia. ii. acute drug induced psychosis. iii. bipolar disorder.
• Participant was taking more the one AP medication during the study.
• Female participants of child bearing potential and male participants whose partner was of child bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception, for example, oral contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for three months thereafter (a male condom was not used in conjunction with a female condom).
• Female participant who was pregnant, lactating, or planning pregnancy during the course of the study and for three months thereafter.
• Participants who had received an IMP within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
• Participants who had any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, either put the participant at risk because of participation in the study, or may have influenced the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
• Participant had any abnormalities following a physical examination that, in the opinion of the investigator, prevented the participant from safe participation in the study.
• Participant was unwilling to abstain from donation of blood during the study.
• Participant had travelled outside the country of residence during the study.
• Participant previously randomized into this study.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Jazz Pharmaceuticals: lead

Study Sites (14)

Unknown Facility

Czeladź, 41-250, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, 80-952, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kielce, 25-103, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lublin, 20-831, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Tychy, 43-100, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, 54-235, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bucharest, 010825, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bucharest, 041914, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Sibiu, 550082, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Târgovişte, 130086, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Târgu Mureş, 540096, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Chertsey, KT16 0AE, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Coventry, CV2 2TE, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

• McGuire P, Robson P, Cubala WJ, Vasile D, Morrison PD, Barron R, Taylor A, Wright S. Cannabidiol (CBD) as an Adjunctive Therapy in Schizophrenia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 1;175(3):225-231. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17030325. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

  PMID: 29241357 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Interventions

Cannabidiol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders; Mental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cannabinoids; Terpenes; Hydrocarbons; Organic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

• Title: Medical Enquires
• Organization: GW Research Ltd

medinfo@gwpharm.com, medinfo@greenwichbiosciences.com

+44 01223 238170; 18778862810

Publication Agreements

• PI is Sponsor Employee: No
• Restriction Type: GT60
• Restrictive Agreement: Yes

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: phase 2
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: QUADRUPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: INDUSTRY
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 5, 2013
• First Posted: December 10, 2013
• Study Start: February 25, 2014
• Primary Completion: January 8, 2015
• Study Completion: January 8, 2015
• Last Updated: September 28, 2022
• Results First Posted: July 26, 2019

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

GB (3); RO (5); PL (6)