A Study of Atezolizumab (an Engineered Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 [PD-L1] Antibody) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Bevacizumab (Avastin®) Compared to Sunitinib (Sutent®) in Participants With Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
IMmotion150
A Phase II, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
305
9 countries
45
Brief Summary
This multicenter, randomized, open-label study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of atezolizumab as monotherapy or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in participants with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have not received prior systemic therapy either in the adjuvant or metastatic setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_2
45 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 17, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 8, 2019
CompletedDecember 23, 2019
December 1, 2019
2.8 years
November 7, 2013
October 11, 2017
December 19, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) Via Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment or Death in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
Progressive Disease (PD): at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in ITT Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment or Death in Immune Cell 1/2/3 (IC1/2/3) Population
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Secondary Outcomes (43)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment or Death in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment or Death in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment or Death in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than the 33rd Percentile Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
- +38 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
EuroQoL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Score
Days 1 and 22 of Cycles 1 to 24; Day 1 of Cycle 25; treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 2.75 years) (1 cycle=6 weeks)
Study Arms (3)
Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab
EXPERIMENTALAtezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) and bevacizumab 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) will be administered as intravenous (IV) infusions every 3 weeks (q3w) on Day 1 and Day 22 of each 6-week cycle until disease progression.
Atezolizumab
EXPERIMENTALAtezolizumab 1200 mg will be administered as IV infusion q3w on Day 1 and Day 22 of each 6-week cycle until disease progression. Upon disease progression, participants (except European Union \[EU\] participants) can crossover to receive atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination until disease progression, lack of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal from study, or study completion or termination.
Sunitinib
ACTIVE COMPARATORSunitinib 50 mg will be administered orally once daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 6-week cycle until disease progression. Upon disease progression, participants can crossover to receive atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination until disease progression, lack of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal from study, or study completion or termination.
Interventions
Atezolizumab will be administered according to the dosage schedule mentioned in the arm description.
Bevacizumab will be administered according to the dosage schedule mentioned in the arm description.
Sunitinib will be administered according to the dosage schedule mentioned in the arm description.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unresectable advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with component of clear cell histology and/or component of sarcomatoid histology that has not been previously treated with any systemic agents, including treatment in the adjuvant setting
- Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
- Karnofsky performance score greater than or equal to (\>/=) 70
- Adequate hematologic and end-organ function as defined by protocol
- Women of childbearing potential and male participants with partners of childbearing potential must agree to use highly effective methods of contraception as defined by protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Radiotherapy for renal cell carcinoma within 14 days prior to Cycle 1, Day 1 with the exception of single-fraction radiotherapy given for the indication of pain control
- Known active malignancies or metastasis of the brain or spinal cord or leptomeningeal disease, as determined by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation during screening and prior radiographic assessments
- Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures (once monthly or more frequently)
- Uncontrolled hypercalcemia or symptomatic hypercalcemia
- Malignancies other than renal cell carcinoma within 5 years prior to Cycle 1, Day 1, with the exception of those with a negligible risk of metastasis or death, treated with expected curative outcome
- Life expectancy of less than (\<) 12 weeks
- Pregnant and lactating women
- History of severe allergic, anaphylactic, or other hypersensitivity reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins
- History of autoimmune disease
- History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan
- Participants with active or chronic hepatitis B, active hepatitis C, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive test, significant cardiovascular disease
- Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplant
- Prior treatment with Cluster of Differentiation 137 (CD137) agonists, anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4), anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1), or anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibody or pathway-targeting agents
- Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory agents for any reason within 6 weeks or five half-lives of the drug, whichever is shorter, prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
- Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medications within 2 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (45)
HonorHealth Research Institute - Bisgrove
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90024, United States
University of California
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
Univ Colorado Health Sci Ctr
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Ctr - Denver (Williams)
Denver, Colorado, 80218, United States
Yale Uni School of Medicine; Section of Medical Oncology
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510-3289, United States
Georgetown U; Lombardi Comp Can
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016-1468, United States
SCRI Florida Cancer Specialists South
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916, United States
Mayo Clinic-Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Florida Cancer Specialist, North Region
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705, United States
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Inst.
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute.
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering
New York, New York, United States
Oncology Hematology Care Inc
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Oncology Associates of Oregon, P.C
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C.
Tigard, Oregon, 97223, United States
Tennessee Oncology PLLC - Nashville (20th Ave)
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-7610, United States
Texas Oncology-Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc, 775 20, Czechia
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Service D'Oncologie Medicale
Paris, 75908, France
CHU Bordeaux
Pessac, 33604, France
Institut Gustave Roussy; Departement Oncologie Medicale
Villejuif, 94805, France
Medizinische Hochschule; Zentrum Innere Medizin; Abt. Hämatologie u. Onkologie
Hanover, 30625, Germany
Klinikum d.Universität München Campus Großhadern
München, 81377, Germany
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München; Klinikapotheke
München, 81675, Germany
Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 2
Milan, Lombardy, 20133, Italy
Medical Oncology, Arezzo
Arezzo, Tuscany, 52100, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, U.O.C. Immunoterapia Oncologica
Siena, Tuscany, 53100, Italy
Centrum Med. Ostrobramska NZOZ Magodent
Warsaw, 04-125, Poland
Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta Institute of Oncology
Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania
Medisprof SRL
Cluj-Napoca, 400058, Romania
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008, Spain
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona. Unidad de Nuevas Terapias;Oncology Department
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Hosp de Madrid Norte Sanchinarro; Centro Integral; Onco Clara Campal
Madrid, 28050, Spain
Barts and the London NHS Trust.
London, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
Royal Marsden Hospital - London
London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
Christie Hospital Nhs Trust; Medical Oncology
Manchester, M2O 4BX, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
PMID: 37146227DERIVEDPal SK, McDermott DF, Atkins MB, Escudier B, Rini BI, Motzer RJ, Fong L, Joseph RW, Oudard S, Ravaud A, Bracarda S, Suarez C, Lam ET, Choueiri TK, Ding B, Quach C, Hashimoto K, Schiff C, Piault-Louis E, Powles T. Patient-reported outcomes in a phase 2 study comparing atezolizumab alone or with bevacizumab vs sunitinib in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):73-82. doi: 10.1111/bju.15058. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
PMID: 32233107DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2013
First Posted
November 14, 2013
Study Start
January 8, 2014
Primary Completion
October 17, 2016
Study Completion
January 8, 2019
Last Updated
December 23, 2019
Results First Posted
December 21, 2017
Record last verified: 2019-12