The Effects of Consuming Whey Protein Polydextrose Snacks on Appetite and Energy Intake
The Effects of Consuming Between- Meal, High Protein Polydextrose Containing Snack Bars on Subjective Satiety, Energy Intake and Metabolic Responses.
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Developing functional foods that enhance satiety may be beneficial to individuals to help manage body weight. We have previously shown that consuming a mid-morning liquid preload with increasing proportion of energy derived from whey protein and addition of polydextrose reduced voluntary energy intake at a lunchtime meal compared to a liquid preload of the same energy content but lower in protein and containing no polydextrose. This study aims to investigate if these results can be replicated when the preload is in the form of a snack bar. We will also investigate whether the daily consumption of the snack bar has an effect on energy intake, subjective appetite and metabolic parameters compared to a control snack of the same energy but with a minimal protein content and without the addition of polydextrose. We hypothesize that the whey protein polydextrose snack will reduce voluntary energy intake at a subsequent test meal, suppress subjective appetite ratings compared with the control snack bar.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable obesity
Started May 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2013
CompletedAugust 23, 2013
August 1, 2013
4 months
August 14, 2013
August 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Energy intake at an ad libitum lunchtime test meal
Energy intake at a lunchtime test meal served 90 min following the consumption of the snack bar on day 1.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Energy intake at an ad libitum lunchtime test meal
Day 15
Subjective appetite responses
Day 1
Remainder of the day energy intake
Day 1
Free living energy intake
Day 4
Free living energy intake
Day 8
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Metabolic responses
Day 1
Metabolic responses
Day 15
Endocrine responses
Day 1
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Whey-protein & polydextrose snack
EXPERIMENTALWhey-protein \& polydextrose snack bar.
Control snack
PLACEBO COMPARATORControl snack bar containing minimal protein and not polydextrose.
Interventions
Subjects will consume one snack bar as a between-meal mid-morning snack daily for 15 days.
Subjects will consume one snack bar as a between-meal mid-morning snack daily for 15 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI 18-25 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- BMI \<18 \> 25 kg/m2
- Dieting or weight loss
- Presence of disease (e.g. diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer etc)
- Currently regularly taking medications
- Restrained eaters (defined as restraint score \>7 on TFEQ)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Nottinghamlead
- Mars, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Nottingham
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Astbury NM, Taylor MA, French SJ, Macdonald IA. Snacks containing whey protein and polydextrose induce a sustained reduction in daily energy intake over 2 wk under free-living conditions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 May;99(5):1131-40. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.075978. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
PMID: 24670946DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian A Macdonald, Phd
University of Nottingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2013
First Posted
August 23, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
August 23, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08