NCT01561235

Brief Summary

Dietary protein appears to be the most satiating and thermogenic macronutrient. However, how protein exerts its effect on appetite is not fully known. The effect have been suggested to be related to a higher oxidation rate of protein compared to carbohydrate and fat, and also to a greater thermogenic effect causing greater increase in core temperature. The involvement of peripheral appetite-regulating hormones has only been sparingly investigated. The objective is to investigate the satiating effects of meals with varying content of meat-based protein and whether a dose-response effect can be found on appetite-regulating hormones and appetite ratings. Design: 25 men will participate in the 3-way, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. The test meals is isocaloric with 30E% fat and increasing protein content at the expense of carbohydrate. Test meals are: normal protein content (NP, 14E% protein), medium-high protein content (MHP, 25E%), and high protein content(HP, 50E%). Four-hour subjective appetite ratings and blood samples will be assessed every half-hour. Subsequently, the subjects will served an ad libitum lunch.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2008

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2008

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2008

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 13, 2012

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 22, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 13, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

ProteinAppetiteSatietyEnergi intakeAppetite regulating hormonesDose-response

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Acute 4-h changes from baseline in the postprandial concentration of GLP-1

    Blood samples were taken prior to the test meal (baseline). After initiation of the test meal blood samples were collected at time 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 minutes. Blood samples are analyzed for GLP-1. Data are planned to be statistically analyzed as repeated measurements in mixed linear models. Peak and time to peak will also be analyzed.

    Measured on 3 seperate test days in a crossover design. Each test day was seperated by >4 weeks. On each test day GLP-1 was measured prior to the test meal (time 0) and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 minutes post intake

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Acute 4-h changes from baseline in subjective appetite sensations using visual analogue scales

    Measured on 3 seperate test days in a crossover design. Each test seperated by >4 weeks. On each test day appetite sensations were measured prior to the test meal (time 0) and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240 minutes post intake.

  • Acute 4-h changes from baseline in the postprandial concentration of appetite regulating hormones/peptides

    Measured on 3 seperate test days in a crossover design. Each test seperated by >4 weeks. On each test day blood samples were collected prior to the test meal (time 0) and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 minutes post intake.

  • Acute 4-h changes from baseline in the postprandial concentration of glucose

    Measured on 3 seperate test days in a crossover design. Each test seperated by >4 weeks. On each test day blood samples were collected prior to the test meal (time 0) and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 minutes post intake.

  • Acute 4-h changes from baseline in the postprandial concentration of insulin

    Measured on 3 seperate test days in a crossover design. Each test seperated by >4 weeks. On each test day blood samples were collected prior to the test meal (time 0) and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 minutes post intake.

  • Acute 4-h changes from baseline in the postprandial concentrations of lipids

    Measured on 3 seperate test days in a crossover design. Each test seperated by >4 weeks. On each test day blood samples were collected prior to the test meal (time 0) and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 minutes post intake.

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Normal Protein

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Energy content 3 or 4 MJ/meal, depending on the subject's individual daily energy requirements). Macronutrient content: Protein: 14 E%, Fat: 30 E% and carbohydrate: 56E%. The fibre content was similar in all three test meals. The test meals were served as pork/rice/mushroom pâtés, flavoured with thyme in order to blind differences in taste.

Other: Dose-reponse effect of protein on appetite and appetite-regulating hormones

Medium-high protein

EXPERIMENTAL

Energy content 3 or 4 MJ/meal, depending on the subject's individual daily energy requirements). Macronutrient content: Protein: 25E%, Fat: 30 E% and carbohydrate: 45E%. The fibre content was similar in all three test meals. The test meals were served as pork/rice/mushroom pâtés, flavoured with thyme in order to blind differences in taste.

Other: Dose-reponse effect of protein on appetite and appetite-regulating hormones

High Protein

EXPERIMENTAL

Energy content 3 or 4 MJ/meal, depending on the subject's individual daily energy requirements). Macronutrient content: Protein: 50 E%, Fat: 30 E% and carbohydrate: 20E%. The fibre content was similar in all three test meals. The test meals were served as pork/rice/mushroom pâtés, flavoured with thyme in order to blind differences in taste.

Other: Dose-reponse effect of protein on appetite and appetite-regulating hormones

Interventions

3-arm meal study for investigation of the mechanisms responsible for the satiating effects of protein in three isocaloric test meals with a protein content of 14, 25 or 50 E% protein. A possible 4-h dose-response effect of protein was investigated on a number of appetite-regulating hormones/peptides, together with changes in subjective appetite sensations and sensory desires were evaluated and ad libitum energy intake.

High ProteinMedium-high proteinNormal Protein

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy,
  • BMI: 18.5-40 kg/m2,
  • Non-smoking,
  • Nonathletic,

You may not qualify if:

  • BMI \> 40 kg/m2,
  • Change in smoking status,
  • Daily or frequent use of medication,
  • Suffering from metabolic diseases,
  • Suffering from psychiatric diseases,
  • Suffering from any other clinical condition, which would make the subject unfit to participate in the study,
  • Blood pressure was above 150/90 mmHg,
  • Hemoglobin \< 8 mmol/l.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of human Nutrition

Frederiksberg, 1958, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Belza A, Ritz C, Sorensen MQ, Holst JJ, Rehfeld JF, Astrup A. Contribution of gastroenteropancreatic appetite hormones to protein-induced satiety. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 May;97(5):980-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.047563. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Arne Astrup, Professor, Dr Med

    Depertment of Human Nutrition, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Dr Med

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2012

First Posted

March 22, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2008

Study Completion

July 1, 2008

Last Updated

June 21, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations