Evaluation of Liver Cancer With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Evaluation of HCC Response to Systemic Therapy With Quantitative MRI
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently increased in the United States. Although imaging plays a major role in HCC screening and staging, the possibility of predicting HCC tumor grade, aggressiveness, angiogenesis and hypoxia with imaging are unmet needs. In addition, new antiangiogenic drugs now available to treat advanced HCC necessitate the use of new imaging criteria beyond size. The investigators would like to develop and validate non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods based on advanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MR Elastography, BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) MRI and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI, using gadolinium contrast) to be used as non-invasive markers of major histopathologic features of HCC, and to predict and assess early response of HCC to systemic therapy. The investigators also would like to develop quality control tools to improve the quality and decrease variability of quantitative MRI metrics. These techniques combined could represent non-invasive correlates of histologic findings in HCC, could enable individualized therapy, and provide prognosis in patients with HCC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Jun 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 9, 2020
CompletedJuly 9, 2020
June 1, 2020
4.7 years
June 4, 2013
May 16, 2020
June 25, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
SubStudy 1: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)
Tumor diffusion (apparent diffusion coefficient) measured with diffusion-weighted imaging sequence
Day 1
SubStudy 1: Total Tumor Perfusion (Ft)
Perfusion/flow measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using gadolinium contrast
Day 1
SubStudy 1: Tumor Arterial Perfusion Fraction (ART)
Perfusion/flow measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using gadolinium contrast
Day 1
SubStudy 1: Tumor Mean Transit Time (MTT)
Tumor mean transit time (MTT) of contrast agent. Perfusion/flow measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using gadolinium contrast
Day 1
SubStudy 1: Tumor Distribution Volume (DV)
Tumor distribution volume (DV) of contrast agent. Perfusion/flow measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using gadolinium contrast
Day 1
SubStudy 1: Oxygen Uptake
Oxygen uptake measured with T2\* and T1-weighted imaging
Day 1
SubStudy 1: Percent Change in Oxygen Uptake
Oxygen uptake measured with T2\* and T1-weighted imaging. Oxygen uptake (% change pre and post O2 administration) calculated by Liver ΔR2\*=100 x (R2\* post O2-R2\* pre O2)/R2\* pre O2. The healthy participants breathed 100% medical O2 through a mask for 10 min., and were imaged before and after O2 administration with the MRI methods that are sensitive to oxygen uptake in tumors.
Day 1, pre-oxygen administration and 10 min. post-oxygen administration
SubStudy 2: ADC
Tumor diffusion measured with diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. In diffusion weighted MR imaging (DWI), the signal is proportional to the Brownian motion diffusion of free water protons in tissues. Deposition of collagen in tissue (as in fibrotic disease), or cellularity in tumors act as impediments to free water diffusion. Using different mathematical models, the degree of diffusion can be quantified from the MRI signal, to provide information on diffusion restriction due to disease. From mono exponential fit of diffusion signal, one can obtain the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). However, this coefficient reflects free water proton diffusion, as well as transport of water protons in the capillary vessels (capillary perfusion).
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
SubStudy 2: Diffusion Coefficient D
Tumor diffusion measured with diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. To separate the diffusion effect from capillary perfusion, a bi-exponential model is used, which provides 3 coefficients: one is the true diffusion coefficient D, reflecting free water proton diffusion.
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
SubStudy 2: Pseudodiffusion Coefficient D*
Tumor diffusion measured with diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. To separate the diffusion effect from capillary perfusion, a bi-exponential model is used, which provides 3 coefficients: one is the pseudo-diffusion coefficient D\*, affected by free diffusion and capillary perfusion.
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
SubStudy 2: Perfusion Fraction (PF)
Tumor diffusion measured with diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. To separate the diffusion effect from capillary perfusion, a bi-exponential model is used, which provides 3 coefficients: one is the perfusion fraction PF, which reflects how much the diffusion-weighted signal is affected by capillary perfusion. PF is a measure of vascularity in the tissue.
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
Secondary Outcomes (6)
SubStudy 2: Total Tumor Perfusion (Ft)
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
SubStudy 2: Tumor Arterial Perfusion Fraction (ART)
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
SubStudy 2: Tumor Mean Transit Time (MTT) of Contrast Agent
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
SubStudy 2: Extravascular Extracellular Volume ve
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
Substudy 2: Tumor Stiffness
baseline and 6 weeks after Y90
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
EXPERIMENTALdynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measuring arterial and portal flow
Healthy Controls
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a radiation free non invasive technique using magnetic radiofrequency waves to image the body. In this study, the research team would like to investigate the possibility of providing functional information on aggressiveness, vascularity and oxygen uptake in liver cancer tumors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Study group
- Patients diagnosed with HCC, who will undergo resection or transplantation within 6 months, as part of routine clinical care and patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC
- years of age and older
- Patient is able to give informed consent for this study
- Control group
- Healthy volunteers 18 years of age and older
- Subject is able to give informed consent for this study
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18 years
- Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
- Contra-indications to MRI:
- Electrical implants such as cardiac pacemakers or perfusion pumps
- Ferromagnetic implants such as aneurysm clips, surgical clips, prostheses, artificial hearts, valves with steel parts, metal fragments, shrapnel, tattoos near the eye, or steel implants
- Ferromagnetic objects such as jewelry or metal clips in clothing
- Pregnant subjects
- Pre-existing medical conditions including a likelihood of developing seizures or claustrophobic reactions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 11103, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Bachir Taouli
- Organization
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bachir Taouli, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Radiology and Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2013
First Posted
June 6, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 2, 2018
Study Completion
February 2, 2018
Last Updated
July 9, 2020
Results First Posted
July 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06