Study of Hypotensive Hematopoietic Malignancy Patients' USCOM Readings

NCT01755000 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 201206070
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 69
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test how practical it is to use the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM), an FDA-approved device, on oncology patients (specifically those with blood cancers). Additionally, the researchers will learn if the USCOM gives additional information about patients' conditions when their blood pressures drop and they are treated with intravenous fluids.

Conditions

Leukemia; Lymphoma; Paraproteinemias; Multiple Myeloma; Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• What is the inter-rater agreement between multiple independent USCOM users measuring stroke volume (SV) and peak velocity (Vpk) whose systolic blood pressures (SBPs) and mean arterial pressures (MAPs) are stable (SBP above 95 mmHg and MAP above 65 mmHg)?

  Pairs of USCOM measurements from multiple raters for SV and Vpk, both of which are interval-level measures. Inter-rater reliability will be assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC); our design fits into case 1 using the Shrout and Fleiss (1979) classification system.

  1 day (one time event for patient)

• What is the inter-rater agreement between multiple independent USCOM users measuring SV and Vpk in hematopoietic malignancy patients whose SBPs drop below 95mmHg or MAPs drop below 65mmHg?

  pairs of USCOM measurements from multiple raters for SV and Vpk. We will use the ICC to evaluate rater agreement here, as well, with the same sample size and the same confidence interval. For Aim 2, though, if the second rating cannot be completed within 5 minutes of the first, that episode will be excluded from the study.

  1 day (one time event for patient)

• In what percentage of patients is fluid bolus administration successful as measured by the current standard of care (MAP) and what is the level of agreement between the standard measure and USCOM readings in determining return to hemodynamic stability?

  After two raters have measured SV and Vpk, bolus will be administered. Determining the success of bolus administration, we will simply record whether the clinician judged the bolus to be successful. In addition, one rater will measure SV and Vpk again using USCOM within 5 minutes of bolus administration. We will then calculate the percentage of patients whose stroke volume and peak velocity increased at least 15% after bolus administration using the post-bolus USCOM reading and the same rater's pre-bolus USCOM reading. We chose an increase of 15% based on a review of the research as the threshold that would best indicate a therapeutic response to bolus administration.

  1 day (one time event for patient)

Study Arms (3)

Aim 1: Hemodynamically Healthy Patients

OTHER

Nurse 1 will perform an USCOM scan and record values of Vpk and SV on the clinical data sheet. Nurse 2 will perform the USCOM second scan within five minutes of Nurse 1's scan and record the values of Vpk and SV on the clinical data sheet. Nurse 1 and 2 will be blinded to each other's scans by using separate clinical data forms

Procedure: USCOM scan

Aim 2: Hemodynamically Unstable Patients

OTHER

Nurse 1 will perform an USCOM scan and record values of Vpk and SV on the clinical data sheet. Nurse 2 will also be notified of the hypotensive event, will then perform the USCOM second scan within five minutes of PI's scan and record the values of Vpk and SV on the clinical data sheet. The two USCOM scans will be completed within 10 minutes of the hypotensive episode. Nurse 1 and Nurse 2 will be blinded to each other's scans by using separate clinical data forms.

Procedure: USCOM scan

Aim 3: Hemodynamically Unstable Patients + Fluid Bolus

OTHER

At the time that an enrolled patient meets one of the following criteria; SBP drops below 95 mmHg or MAP drops below 65 mmHg the PI will be notified to PI to perform the USCOM scan and record the Vpk, SV, systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure on the clinical data sheet within 10 minutes of the hypotensive episode, prior to the patient receiving a fluid bolus (fluid bolus is part of standard of care). The USCOM scan will then be repeated within 5 minutes after fluid bolus delivery. Before the hemodynamically unstable patient receives subsequent fluid boluses (multiple boluses are common standard of care), the PI will perform an USCOM scan. Then within 5 minutes after the delivered fluid bolus, the PI will perform another USCOM scan. This will continue, until no further boluses are prescribed.

Procedure: USCOM scan; Procedure: Fluid Bolus

Interventions

USCOM scan PROCEDURE

Aim 1: Hemodynamically Healthy Patients; Aim 2: Hemodynamically Unstable Patients; Aim 3: Hemodynamically Unstable Patients + Fluid Bolus

Fluid Bolus PROCEDURE

Aim 3: Hemodynamically Unstable Patients + Fluid Bolus

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• ≥ 18 years of age
• English speaker
• Diagnosis of blood dyscrasia, hematopoietic malignancy, or condition that may requires HSCT

You may not qualify if:

• Obstruction of the suprasternal notch that prevents placing the USCOM probe in the correct location
• Tracheostomy or endotracheal tube that prevents placing USCOM probe in the correct location
• Inability to lie flat, on left or right side, or with the head of bed at a 30 degree angle for the USCOM exam (ex. due to respiratory distress or physiologic reasons)
• Impairment by a psychiatric, cognitive, or physiologic disorder that limits ability to understand explanation of study and give consent

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Washington University School of Medicine: lead

Study Sites (1)

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Links

• Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Leukemia; Lymphoma; Paraproteinemias; Multiple Myeloma; Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Hematologic Diseases; Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Lymphatic Diseases; Immunoproliferative Disorders; Immune System Diseases; Blood Protein Disorders; Neoplasms, Plasma Cell; Hemostatic Disorders; Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Hemorrhagic Disorders; Bone Marrow Diseases

Study Officials

• Michelle Parmentier, RN, BSN

  Washington University School of Medicine

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NON RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 18, 2012
• First Posted: December 21, 2012
• Study Start: December 1, 2012
• Primary Completion: April 1, 2013
• Study Completion: April 1, 2013
• Last Updated: September 2, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-08

Locations

US (1)