Warm Water Versus Room Temperature Water Immersion Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
212
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Water immersion insertion has been documented to decrease procedure-related discomfort during colonoscopy. There was used warm water infusion for colonoscope insertion in most of the water immersion colonoscopy trials. The investigators have been using room temperature water (20-24°C) for water immersion and the investigators did not notice any drawback of it. In our opinion, it is simpler and cheaper option for water immersion colonoscopy and proof of its efficacy and safety could support the use of water immersion technique in routine practice. The primary endpoint is cecal intubation time and the investigators suppose that the use of warm water infusion does not shorten it significantly. Patient comfort during colonoscope insertion, water consumption, length of the scope while reaching the cecum, need for external compression, need for positioning of the patient and endoscopist´s difficulty with colonoscopy will be also assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Jun 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 1, 2013
CompletedSeptember 20, 2013
September 1, 2013
4 months
April 18, 2012
June 2, 2013
September 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cecal Intubation Time
3 months
Cecal Intubation Time
= time between introduction of the colonoscope into the anus and reaching the cecum.
1-30
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient Comfort During Insertion Phase of the Colonoscopy
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Warm Water Immersion Colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALColonoscopy using purely warm water (37°C) infusion during colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
Cool Water Immersion Colonoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORColonoscopy using purely room temperature water (20-24°C) infusion during colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
Interventions
Colonoscopy using warm water (37°C) infusion for colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
Colonoscopy using room temperature water (20-24°C) infusion for colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- outpatient diagnostic colonoscopy
- bowel prep with macrogolum
- initial 2 mg of midazolam i.v.
- signed informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- planned therapeutic intervention
- colorectal surgery in history
- known inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal cancer
- refusal of sedation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Digestive Diseases Center, Vitkovice Hospital
Ostrava, 703 84, Czechia
Related Publications (1)
Falt P, Smajstrla V, Fojtik P, Tvrdik J, Urban O. Cool water vs warm water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized trial. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):e612-7. doi: 10.1111/codi.12336.
PMID: 23819909BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Premysl Falt, MD
- Organization
- Vitkovice Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Premysl Falt, MD
Digestive Diseases Center, Vitkovice Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2012
First Posted
April 20, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 20, 2013
Results First Posted
August 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09