Screening for Colorectal Cancer With FOBT, Virtual Colonoscopy and Optical Colonoscopy. A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Florence District
SAVE
Comparison Between Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT), Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) With Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) and Colonoscopy as a Primary Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer. Validation of a Teleradiology Model. Biological Banking in Subjects Recruited for Colonoscopy or CTC.
2 other identifiers
interventional
16,087
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) has proven to be accurate in detecting colorectal neoplasms and may be a primary test in colorectal cancer screening. PURPOSE: This clinical trial will compare participation rate, diagnostic yield and costs of computed tomographic colonography, faecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy (CO) as a primary screening test in a population-based programme.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Dec 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2018
CompletedNovember 27, 2018
November 1, 2018
6 years
July 20, 2012
November 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Participation rate to faecal occult blood test (FOBT), computed tomographic colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy
2 years
Detection rate for cancer or advanced adenomas of CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year
6 years
Referral rate for colonoscopy induced by primary CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year
6 years
Costs of the three different screening strategies proposed
6 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Expected and perceived burden of colonoscopy and CTC
2 years
Number and type of complications in all groups
2 years
Study Arms (4)
Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), reduced prep
EXPERIMENTALSubjects invited to undergo CTC with reduced cathartic preparation
Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), standard prep
EXPERIMENTALSubjects invited to undergo CTC with standard bowel preparation
Faecal occult blood test (FOBT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects invited to undergo FOBT
Colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALSubjects invited to undergo colonoscopy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Never invited to previous colorectal cancer screening.
You may not qualify if:
- Personal history of colorectal cancer or colonic advanced adenomas.
- Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
- Previous five years complete colonoscopy or previous two years faecal occult blood test (FOBT).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO
Florence, FI, 50139, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Sali L, Ventura L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Carozzi F, Milani S, Zappa M, Grazzini G, Mantellini P. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):1016-1023. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00269-2. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
PMID: 36116454DERIVEDSali L, Grazzini G, Carozzi F, Castiglione G, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Mantellini P, Ventura L, Regge D, Zappa M, Mascalchi M, Milani S. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study). Trials. 2013 Mar 15;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-74.
PMID: 23497601DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefano Milani, MD
University of Florence
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Grazia Grazzini, MD
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2012
First Posted
July 27, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 25, 2018
Study Completion
November 25, 2018
Last Updated
November 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11