Quantitative Versus Qualitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) to Prioritize Urgency of Colonoscopy Referral
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Screening Strategies Using Quantitative Versus Qualitative Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) to Prioritize Urgency of Colonoscopy Referral - a Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
700
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main aim of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in time to diagnosis of advanced colorectal neoplasms using quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) to prioritize referral for colonoscopy (intervention) compared to usual care (qualitative FIT and appointment-based referral).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Jun 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 27, 2017
October 1, 2017
4 years
January 14, 2014
October 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to diagnosis of advanced colorectal neoplasms
Measured as number of days from the time of enrolment until histological diagnosis of a colorectal neoplasm
40-90 days from the time of enrolment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Analysis of screening costs
Up to 90 days following enrolment
Patient anxiety levels
Up to 90 days after enrolment
Study Arms (2)
Qualitative fecal immunochemical test
OTHERStool samples will be tested with the qualitative fecal immunochemical test (qFIT), and will be stratified for colonoscopy as follows: \>200 ng/dL - colonoscopy with one month 100-200 ng/dL - colonoscopy as per waiting list \<100 ng/dL - no colonoscopy Cost analysis, anxiety scores and patient satisfaction scores will be calculated for all patients.
Quantitative fecal immunochemical test
OTHERStool samples will be tested with the quantitative fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and will be scheduled for colonoscopy as follows: Positive - colonoscopy as per waiting list Negative - no colonoscopy Cost analysis, anxiety scores and patient satisfaction scores will be calculated for all patients.
Interventions
This test measures the amount of blood within the submitted stool specimen
This test detects presence or absence of blood within a submitted stool specimen.
Patients with positive tests will be subjected to colonoscopy to determine presence or absence of advanced colorectal neoplasms.
Data on direct and indirect costs to patient and institution will be collected at each patient visit related to screening.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire
A 5-point patient satisfaction score will be documented at each patient visit related to screening.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 50 years and above
You may not qualify if:
- Lower gastrointestinal tract symptoms such as diarrhoea, constipation, per rectal bleeding
- Personal history of colorectal tumour or cancer
- Family history of familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Malaya Medical Centre
Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
April C Roslani, MBBCh
University of Malaya Medical Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2014
First Posted
January 16, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10