Acute Effect of Animal and Vegetable Protein Rich Meals With Comparable Dietary Fibers Content on Appetite Sensation and Energy Intake
PAVA-II
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background:
- New Nordic diet guidelines advocate a reduction in consumption of protein from animal sources such as beef and pork, due to environmental concerns.
- Instead, intake of protein from vegetable sources such as legumes and pulses should be increased.
- A previous study showed that a meal enriched with vegetable protein increased the subjective sensation of satiety and decreased hunger and ad libitum energy intake (EI) compared to animal protein.
- This study did, however, not document that vegetable protein per se is more satiating than animal protein as the vegetable meal had higher fiber content. Fiber is a likely confounder.
- The protein from egg is sparingly investigated in relation to appetite. Few studies have found that eggs have a high satiety index but further investigation is needed. Objective: \- To examine if vegetable protein (beans and peas) can suppress subjective appetite (VAS and ad libitum energy intake) compared to isocaloric meals enriched with either red meat or egg with similar distribution of macronutrients and content of dietary fibers. Design: Single-blind randomized 4-way crossover meal study Subjects: 33 young healthy men (Age: 18-50 years; BMI: 19-30 kg/m2). Expected completers: n=30. End points:
- Subjective appetite (VAS) (every 30 min for 3 hours)
- Ad libitum EI (3 hours after lunch test meal)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable obesity
Started Aug 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedJune 30, 2016
June 1, 2016
4 months
June 7, 2012
June 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ad libitum energy intake
180 min after each test meal an ad libitum meal of spaghetti bolognese is served, and the total energy intake is recorded.
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test day is separated by >1 week. Assessed 180 min after each of the 4 test meals.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Acute 3-h changes from baseline in subjective appetite sensations using visual analogue scales
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test day is separated by >1 week. On each test day appetite sensations are measured prior to the test meal (time 0) and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes post intake
Rating of the organoleptic quality of the test meals
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. On each test day after completion of the test meal subjects will rate the test meal
Rating of the organoleptic quality of the ad libitum meal
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. On each test day after completion of the ad libitum meal (approximately) time 15-20 minutes post intake) subjects will rate the ad libitum meal
Subjective appetite sensations (visual analogue scales) after ad libitum meal
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. After completion of the ad libitum meal subjects will rate their subjective sensation of appetite (approx 3.5-h post intake of test meal)
Compensatory food intake (weighed dietary food record)
Measured on 4 separate test days in a crossover design. Each test separated by >1 week. Participants fill in a weighed food record from the time they complete the lunch until midnight.
Study Arms (4)
Vegetable protein meal
EXPERIMENTALVegetable protein meal based on legumes (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 28 g dietary fibers)
Egg protein meal + fibers
EXPERIMENTALProtein meal based on eggs and added pea dietary fibers (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 28 g dietary fibers)
Egg protein meal
EXPERIMENTALProtein meal based on egg without added dietary fibers (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 6 g dietary fibers)
Meat protein meal + fibers
EXPERIMENTALProtein meal based on meat and added pea dietary fibers (3.6 MJ, 19E% protein, 29 g dietary fibers)
Interventions
4-arm crossover study with the objective to examine if vegetable protein (beans and peas) can suppress subjective appetite (VAS and ad libitum EI) compared to isocaloric meals enriched with either red meat or egg with similar distribution of macronutrients and content of dietary fibers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy
- BMI: 18.5-30.0 kg/m2
- Non-smoking
- Nonathletic (\< 10 h hard physical activity)
You may not qualify if:
- BMI \> 30 kg/m2
- Change in smoking status
- Daily or frequent use of medication that can affect appetite
- Suffering from metabolic diseases
- Suffering from psychiatric diseases
- Suffering from any other clinical condition, which would make the subject unfit to participate in the study
- alcohol and drug abuse
- food allergies or relevance for the test meals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen
Frederiksberg, 1958, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne B Raben, PhD
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Dr Med
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2012
First Posted
June 11, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 30, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06