NCT01354223

Brief Summary

This study seeks to evaluate a new daily disposable contact lens compared to an existing daily disposable contact lens.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2010

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 16, 2011

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 21, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

January 10, 2011

Results QC Date

October 23, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

silicone hydrogel contact lensSHCLstenfilcon Aocufilcon Bdaily disposablesubstantial equivalenceCooperVision ClearSight™ 1 Day SCL

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Objective Assessment: Ocular Response - Biomicroscopy

    The primary safety endpoint are the objective slit lamp findings associated with the stenfilcon A contact lenses compared with those same findings reported as associated with the ocufilcon B contact lenses. The incidence of biomicroscopy findings (0=not present, 4=severe) over the duration of the study with the highest reported grade was chosen for each unique eye. Biomicroscopy measurements were obtained at Baseline (baseline visit) and All Follow-Ups (week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit combined).The average grade for unique eyes with findings greater than 0 (none) is compared.

    Change from baseline visit and all follow-ups visits

  • Comparison of Objective Findings - Number of Adverse Events in Unique Eyes

    The primary safety endpoint in this evaluation will be a comparison of the objective findings of the number of adverse events in unique eyes associated with the stenfilcon A contact lenses compared with those same findings as associated with ocufilcon B contact lenses. The number of adverse events over the duration of the study was reported for each unique eye (bilateral or unilateral). Observations for adverse events were reported for any occurrence after dispensing (dispensing visit) through end of month 3 visit (month 3 visit).

    Any occurrence from dispensing to month 3 visit

  • Comparison of Objective Findings for Contact Lens Visual Acuities - Snellen 20/25 VA or Better

    The primary efficacy endpoint are the contact lens Snellen visual acuities (VA) of 20/25 VA or better associated with stenfilcon A compared with those same visual acuities associated with ocufilcon B. Snellen visual acuity (VA) examinations were performed at All Follow-up visits (week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit). The combined results of All Follow-up visits are compared.

    week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit combined

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Subjective Assessment of Contact Lens Comfort - No Symptoms of Discomfort

    Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

  • Evaluation of Average Lens Wearing Time - Average Daily Hours Worn

    Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

Study Arms (2)

stenfilcon A contact lens

EXPERIMENTAL

Randomized to stenfilcon A contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode

Device: stenfilcon A contact lens

ocufilcon B contact lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Randomized to ocufilcon B contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode

Device: ocufilcon B contact lens

Interventions

Randomized to stenfilcon A contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode

stenfilcon A contact lens

Daily disposable contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode

Also known as: CooperVision ClearSight™ 1 Day
ocufilcon B contact lens

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Prior to being considered eligible to participate in this study, each subject MUST:
  • Be at least 18 years of age as of the date of evaluation for the study.
  • Have:
  • Read the Informed Consent
  • been given an explanation of the Informed Consent
  • indicated understanding of the Informed Consent
  • signed the Informed Consent document.
  • Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and able to keep all specified appointments.
  • Be an adapted, current full-time silicone hydrogel or soft contact lens wearer. An adapted full-time wearer is defined as wearing contact lenses on a daily basis for at least 8 hours per day for at least one month prior to participation in the study.
  • Possess wearable and visually functional eyeglasses.
  • Be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge.
  • Require spectacle lens powers between -1.00 and -6.00 diopters sphere with no more than 1.00 diopter of refractive astigmatism and be willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes.
  • Have manifest refraction Snellen visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than 20/25 in each eye.
  • Upon completing the fitting process with the lenses to be worn in the study, have contact lens Snellen VA equal to or better than 20/30 in each eye.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects may not be enrolled in this study if any of the following apply: The subject is/has:
  • Wearing lenses in a monovision modality and is unwilling to be fit with distance lenses in both eyes. NOTE: Subjects may not wear lenses in a monovision modality at any time during the study as it will interfere with the visual acuity analysis.
  • Poor personal hygiene.
  • Any active participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to this study.
  • Currently pregnant (to the best of the subject's knowledge), is lactating or is planning a pregnancy within the next 3 months.
  • A member, relative or household member of the investigator or of the investigational office staff.
  • Has a known sensitivity to ingredients used in the over the counter contact lens lubricants approved for use in the study.
  • Previous refractive surgery; or current or previous orthokeratology treatment.
  • Is aphakic or psuedophakic.
  • Ocular or systemic disease such as, but not limited to: anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present), glaucoma, Sjögren's syndrome, lupus erythematosus, sclerodermia, keratoconus or type II diabetes.
  • The need for topical ocular medications or any medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would require the lenses to be removed during the day.
  • The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
  • A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates or fungal infections.
  • A history of papillary conjunctivitis that has interfered with contact lens wear.
  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear, including but not limited to:
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Eric M. White, OD, Inc.

San Diego, California, 92123, United States

Location

Vision Care Associates

East Lansing, Michigan, 48823, United States

Location

Western Reserve Vision Care

Beachwood, Ohio, 44122, United States

Location

Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.

Brentwood, Tennessee, 37027, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
William J. Gleason, O.D.
Organization
Foresight Regulatory Strategies, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Stephen Byrnes, OD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Lee Rigel, OD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mary Jo Stiegemeier, OD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Peter Van Hoven, OD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Eric White, OD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2011

First Posted

May 16, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion

March 1, 2011

Study Completion

April 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 29, 2020

Results First Posted

March 21, 2014

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations