Evaluation of the Performance of Different Daily Disposable Lens Designs in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is to refit existing soft lens wearers with two different daily disposable contact lens types, Lens A and Lens B, to determine their performance after one week of wear.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 16, 2021
CompletedSeptember 16, 2021
September 1, 2021
3 months
December 4, 2020
August 20, 2021
September 14, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Lens Wettability
Lens wettability on a 0 to 4 descriptive scale, 0.5 steps (0 - Very poor: Immediately displaying non-wetting areas on the lens surface, immediate drying time, 1 - Poor: Irregular surface appearance, drying time \<\< blink time, 2 - Acceptable: Smooth surface appearance immediately after the blink becoming irregular after a while, drying time ≤ blink time, 3 - Good: Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time, 4 - Excellent: Appearance similar to a healthy cornea with very long drying time)
Baseline - after 2 hours of lens wear
Lens Wettability
Lens wettability on a 0 to 4 descriptive scale, 0.5 steps (0 - Very poor: Immediately displaying non-wetting areas on the lens surface, immediate drying time, 1 - Poor: Irregular surface appearance, drying time \<\< blink time, 2 - Acceptable: Smooth surface appearance immediately after the blink becoming irregular after a while, drying time ≤ blink time, 3 - Good: Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time, 4 - Excellent: Appearance similar to a healthy cornea with very long drying time)
1 week
Study Arms (2)
stenfilcon A - (Test lens)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be randomized to wear test lenses for one week then cross-over to the control lenses for one week.
kalifilcon A - (Control Lens)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be randomized to wear control lenses for one week then cross-over to the test lenses for one week.
Interventions
Subjects will be randomized to wear test lenses for one week.
Subjects will be randomized to wear control lenses for one week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
- Has read and signed an information consent letter;
- Self reports having a full eye examination in the previous two years;
- Anticipates being able to wear the study lenses for at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week;
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
- Habitually wears soft contact lenses, for the past 3 months minimum;
- Has refractive astigmatism no higher than -0.75DC in each eye;
- Can be fit and achieve binocular distance vision of at least 20/30 Snellen (Available lens parameters are sphere -1.00 to -6.00D, 0.25D steps).
You may not qualify if:
- Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
- Habitually wears one of the study contact lenses;
- Has any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection that contraindicates contact lens wear;
- Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect contact lens wear or a study outcome variable;
- Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic sodium fluorescein used in the study;
- Self-reports as pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment;
- Has undergone refractive error surgery or intraocular surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Complete Eye Care of Medina
Medina, Minnesota, 55340, United States
Sacco Eye Group, PLLC
Vestal, New York, 13850, United States
Athens Eye Care
Athens, Ohio, 45701, United States
Nittany Eye Associates
College, Pennsylvania, 16801, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jose A. Vega, O.D., MSc, FAAO
- Organization
- Coopervision
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lyndon Jones, PhD
Centre for Ocular Research & Education
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2020
First Posted
December 16, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 5, 2021
Study Completion
February 5, 2021
Last Updated
September 16, 2021
Results First Posted
September 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09