Combination of BKM120 and Bevacizumab in Refractory Solid Tumors and Relapsed/Refractory Glioblastoma Multiforme
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of BKM120 and Bevacizumab in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors (Phase I) and Relapsed/Refractory Glioblastoma Multiforme (Phase II)
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
8
Brief Summary
In this phase I/II study,investigators are evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of BKM120, an oral inhibitor of PI3 kinase, and bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory GBM. In the Phase I part of the trial, the optimal BKM120 dose to be administered with a standard dose of bevacizumab will be determined in patients with refractory solid tumors. Although it is unlikely that the concurrent administration of bevacizumab will alter the pharmacokinetics of BKM120, limited pharmacokinetic sampling will be performed on all patients treated during the Phase II portion of the study. Assuming this combination is feasible, the Phase II portion of the study will proceed, using the doses determined in the Phase I portion. In the phase II portion, eligible patients will be limited to those with recurrent/progressive GBM following 1st line combined modality therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_1
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 29, 2018
CompletedJune 17, 2020
June 1, 2020
5 years
April 25, 2011
November 30, 2017
June 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Phase I Patients Receiving 60mg or 80mg BKM120 Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) to Determine the Optimal Dosage
The optimal dose of BKM120 to administer in combination with standard dose bevacizumab determined as the dose at which ≤1 of 6 patients experiences a DLT assessed using NCI CTCAE v4.03 during Cycle 1 (28 days). The optimal dose of BKM120 was determined to be 60 mg by mouth (PO), once a day for each 28 day cycle along with bevacizumab, administered 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 28 day cycle.
Collected from day of first dose to the end of the first treatment cycle, up to 28 days
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Phase II Participants - Prior Bevacizumab and Bevacizumab Naive
Two groups of patients in the Phase II trial will be considered separately, 1) participants who have not received previous bevacizumab and 2) participants who have received bevacizumab as part of first-line treatment. PFS is measured from the date of first protocol treatment until date of disease progression or death occurs, or date of last adequate tumor assessment using RANO or McDonald criteria. McDonald disease progression criteria: a 25% or greater increase in sum of the diameters of lesions, new lesions, or clinical deterioration (McDonald et al, 1990). RANO disease progression criteria: a 25% or greater increase in the enhancing lesions sum compared with smallest tumor measurement, significant increase in T2/FLAIR nonenhancing lesion on stable or increasing corticosteroids, new lesions, or clinical deterioration (Wen et al 2010)
every 8 weeks for up to 33 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Overall Response (CR or PR) of Phase II Participants - Prior Bevacizumab and Bevacizumab Naive
every 8 weeks, projected 24 months
Median Overall Survival (OS) in Phase II Participants - Prior Bevacizumab and Bevacizumab Naive
every 12 weeks for up to 60 months
Number of Participants With Grade 3/4/5 Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
every 4 weeks for up to 5.2 years
Study Arms (1)
BKM120/Bevacizumab
EXPERIMENTALPhase I: BKM 120 orally (PO) once daily (dose is 60mg or 80mg). Bevacizumab: 10mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 2 weeks Phase II: BKM 120 orally (PO) once daily - dose is optimal dose determined in Phase I. Bevacizumab: 10mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 2 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Phase I ONLY:
- Advanced, metastatic solid tumor that has progressed after standard therapy, or is a tumor type resistant to therapy, and for which bevacizumab is clinically appropriate.
- Patient may have measurable disease or non-measureable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1 criteria
- Phase II ONLY:
- Progressive GBM after treatment with surgical resection (if possible) and 1st line radiation/chemotherapy.
- No previous treatment with a PI3K inhibitor. Previous treatment with bevacizumab as a component of first-line therapy is allowed.
- At least one measurable or evaluable lesion definable by MRI scan. Disease must be measurable by RANO criteria.
- Archival tumor tissue available for correlative testing.
- ALL PATIENTS:
- Patient must be ≥ 4 weeks from administration of last dose of cancer therapy (including radiation therapy, biologic therapy, hormonal therapy, or chemotherapy). Patients who receive a small molecule targeted therapy as part of their first line treatment regimen must be ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 5 half lives from administration of last dose, whichever is shorter. The patient must have recovered from or come to a new chronic or stable baseline from all treatment-related toxicities.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.
- Life expectancy of ≥ 3 months.
- Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with diarrhea ≥ grade 2.
- Patients with uncontrolled type I or type II diabetes mellitus, defined as a fasting plasma glucose ≥120 mg/dL.
- Patients who have received prior treatment with a P13K inhibitor.
- Treatment with therapeutic doses of coumarin-type anticoagulants (maximum daily dose of 1 mg allowed for port line patency permitted).
- Patient has active cardiac disease including any of the following:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 50% as determined by Multiple Grated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram (ECHO)
- QTc \> 480 msec on screening ECG (using the QTcF formula)
- Angina pectoris that requires the use of anti-anginal medication
- Ventricular arrhythmias except for benign premature ventricular contractions
- Supraventricular and nodal arrhythmias requiring a pacemaker or not controlled with medication
- Conduction abnormality requiring a pacemaker
- Valvular disease with documented compromise in cardiac function
- Symptomatic pericarditis
- Patients who are currently receiving treatment with medication with a known risk to prolong the QT interval or inducing Torsades de Pointes and the treatment cannot either be discontinued or switched to a different medication prior to starting study drug.
- Patients with clinical history of hemoptysis or hematemesis (defined as having bright red blood of ½ teaspoon or more per episode) ≤1 month prior to study enrollment.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- SCRI Development Innovations, LLClead
- Novartiscollaborator
Study Sites (8)
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916, United States
Florida Hospital Cancer Institute
Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705, United States
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, United States
Grand Rapids Oncology Program
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503, United States
Nebraska Methodist Hospital
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Tennessee Oncology
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Related Publications (8)
Bleehen NM, Stenning SP. A Medical Research Council trial of two radiotherapy doses in the treatment of grades 3 and 4 astrocytoma. The Medical Research Council Brain Tumour Working Party. Br J Cancer. 1991 Oct;64(4):769-74. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.396.
PMID: 1654987BACKGROUNDBokstein F, Shpigel S, Blumenthal DT. Treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan for recurrent high-grade glial tumors. Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2267-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23401.
PMID: 18327820BACKGROUNDEisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
PMID: 19097774BACKGROUNDStupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330.
PMID: 15758009BACKGROUNDVredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE 2nd, Marcello J, Reardon DA, Quinn JA, Rich JN, Sathornsumetee S, Gururangan S, Sampson J, Wagner M, Bailey L, Bigner DD, Friedman AH, Friedman HS. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 20;25(30):4722-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2440.
PMID: 17947719BACKGROUNDWen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
PMID: 20231676BACKGROUNDMacdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 1990 Jul;8(7):1277-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.7.1277.
PMID: 2358840BACKGROUNDChakravarti A, Zhai G, Suzuki Y, Sarkesh S, Black PM, Muzikansky A, Loeffler JS. The prognostic significance of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway activation in human gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1926-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.193.
PMID: 15143086BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Charles Davis, RAC
- Organization
- Sarah Cannon Development Innovations
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kent Shih, MD
Sarah Cannon
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2011
First Posted
May 6, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 29, 2018
Last Updated
June 17, 2020
Results First Posted
January 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2020-06