A Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erlotinib (Tarceva®) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as the First-line Treatment for Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients With Mutations in the Tyrosine Kinase Domain of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) in Their Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
217
3 countries
28
Brief Summary
This open-label, randomized, parallel arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in their tumours. Patients were randomized to receive either Tarceva 150 mg orally daily or 3-week cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (iv) on Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 iv on Day 1.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer
Started Mar 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 24, 2015
CompletedFebruary 24, 2015
February 1, 2015
1.3 years
April 26, 2011
February 5, 2015
February 5, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Investigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free Survival
The duration of progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as: (1) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (2) An unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. When the patient has measurable disease, the overall tumor burden must have increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. When the patient has only non-measurable disease, the increase in overall disease burden should be comparable in magnitude to the increase that would be required to declare PD for measurable disease. (3) The appearance of new malignant lesions.
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Responders as Assessed by the Investigator
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
Duration of Response
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)
Overall Survival
Baseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)
Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events
36 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Erlotinib
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
Chemotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
Interventions
Cisplatin and gemcitabine were locally sourced with commercial products.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult participants, ≥ 18 years of age.
- Locally advanced or recurrent (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer.
- Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in tumours.
- Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria.
- European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior exposure to agents directed at the human epidermal receptor (HER) axis (eg, but not limited to erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab, or trastuzumab).
- Prior chemotherapy or systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease.
- Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome, or inability to take oral medication, or active gastroduodenal ulcer disease.
- Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye.
- ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy.
- History of any other malignancies within 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell skin cancer.
- Brain metastasis or spinal cord compression that has not yet been definitely treated with surgery and/or radiation, or treated but without evidence of stable disease for at least 2 months.
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
- Pregnant, nursing, or lactating women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (28)
Unknown Facility
Beijing, 100071, China
Unknown Facility
Beijing, 101149, China
Unknown Facility
Changchun, 130012, China
Unknown Facility
Chongqing, 400038, China
Unknown Facility
Chongqing, 400042, China
Unknown Facility
Fuzhou, 350014, China
Unknown Facility
Guangzhou, 510080, China
Unknown Facility
Hangzhou, 310016, China
Unknown Facility
Nanjing, 210002, China
Unknown Facility
Shanghai, 200030, China
Unknown Facility
Shanghai, 200032, China
Unknown Facility
Shanghai, 200433, China
Unknown Facility
Shantou, 515041, China
Unknown Facility
Wuhan, 430023, China
Unknown Facility
Xi'an, 710061, China
Unknown Facility
Kampung Baharu Nilai, 71800, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Kuala Pahang, 25100, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Petaling Jaya, 46150, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, 46050, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Pulau Pinang, 11600, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Davao City, 8000, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Desmarinas City, 4114, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Manila, 1000, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Quezon City, 1104, Philippines
Unknown Facility
San Juan City, 1500, Philippines
Related Publications (2)
Wen F, Zheng H, Zhang P, Hutton D, Li Q. OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e020128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020128.
PMID: 29654023DERIVEDWu YL, Zhou C, Liam CK, Wu G, Liu X, Zhong Z, Lu S, Cheng Y, Han B, Chen L, Huang C, Qin S, Zhu Y, Pan H, Liang H, Li E, Jiang G, How SH, Fernando MCL, Zhang Y, Xia F, Zuo Y. First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1883-1889. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv270. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
PMID: 26105600DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2011
First Posted
April 27, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 24, 2015
Results First Posted
February 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02