Study Stopped
Recruitment halted: Failed to achieve efficacy
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Failed Treatment With NSAIDs
A Ph II/III Seamless, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Reduction in Signs and Symptoms and Inhibition of Structural Damage During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Failed Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Are naïve to TNF Antagonist Therapy NSAIDs
2 other identifiers
interventional
306
18 countries
139
Brief Summary
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have failed treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and are naïve to tumor necrsos factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. In Part 1 of the study, patients will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. In Part 2, patients will be randomized to receive RoActemra at either 8 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg IV or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The double-blind treatment period will be followed by open-label treatment with RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks until Week 208 for all patients. Anticipated time on study treatment is 208 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Sep 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
139 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 11, 2013
CompletedFebruary 11, 2013
January 1, 2013
8 months
September 24, 2010
November 26, 2012
January 10, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 12
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS20 response required improvement of ≥20% and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening of ≥ 20 % and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in the remaining domain. * The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100). * The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions. * The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values. * The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Baseline and Week 12
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 12
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS20 response required improvement of ≥20% and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening of ≥ 20 % and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in the remaining domain. * The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100). * The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions. * The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values. * The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Baseline and Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 24
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Value <2 in Each of the 4 ASAS Parameters at Week 12
Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 40% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS40) at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 40% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS40) at Week 24
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Baseline and Week 12
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Part 1: Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208.
Part 1: Tocilizumab
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208.
Part 2: Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis-20 (ASAS20) response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.
Part 2: Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received intravenous infusions of 4 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.
Part 2: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.
Interventions
Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks
Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age
- Ankylosing Spondylitis as defined by the modified New York criteria for ≥ 3 months prior to baseline
- Active disease at screening and baseline (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] ≥4.0, spinal pain visual analog scale \[VAS\] ≥40)
- Inadequate response or intolerant to 1 or more previous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) must be withdrawn for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline (methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine may be allowed if at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline)
- Oral corticosteroids (≥ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors must be at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline
You may not qualify if:
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months after randomization
- Total ankylosis of spine (as determined by investigator)
- Inflammatory rheumatic disease other than ankylosing spondylitis
- Active, acute uveitis at baseline
- Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy at any time prior to baseline
- Intra-articular or tendon injections or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
- Active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial or other infection
- History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
- Body weight \> 150 kg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (139)
Unknown Facility
Huntington Beach, California, 92646, United States
Unknown Facility
Aventura, Florida, 33180, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
Unknown Facility
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Unknown Facility
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, 67207, United States
Unknown Facility
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Claire Shores, Michigan, 48081, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States
Unknown Facility
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408, United States
Unknown Facility
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory Grove, South Carolina, 28602, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77004, United States
Unknown Facility
Adelaide, 5041, Australia
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, 3084, Australia
Unknown Facility
Hobart, 7000, Australia
Unknown Facility
Malvern East, 3145, Australia
Unknown Facility
Maroochydore, 4558, Australia
Unknown Facility
Sydney, 2050, Australia
Unknown Facility
Woodville, 5011, Australia
Unknown Facility
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Kortrijk, 8500, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Yvoir, 5530, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Cuiabá, 78025-000, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Goiânia, 74110-120, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, 04026-000, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, 04039-000, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, 04266-010, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Rousse, 7002, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sevlievo, 5400, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, 1233, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, 1612, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, 1709, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M3, Canada
Unknown Facility
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 5B8, Canada
Unknown Facility
Kitchener, Ontario, N2M 5N6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2V8, Canada
Unknown Facility
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2N 7E4, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 6V1, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada
Unknown Facility
Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7, Canada
Unknown Facility
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4, Canada
Unknown Facility
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 1Y2, Canada
Unknown Facility
Bruntál, 792 01, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Hlučín, 748 01, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Olomouc, 775 20, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, 12850, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, 140 00, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, 148 00, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Praha 4 Nusle, 140 00, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Sokolov, 356 01, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Zlín, 760 01, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Besançon, 25030, France
Unknown Facility
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104, France
Unknown Facility
Créteil, 94010, France
Unknown Facility
Grenoble, 38042, France
Unknown Facility
Montpellier, 34295, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, 75679, France
Unknown Facility
Strasbourg, 67098, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, 31059, France
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 14059, Germany
Unknown Facility
Cologne, 50924, Germany
Unknown Facility
Gommern, 39245, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hanover, 30625, Germany
Unknown Facility
Würzburg, 97080, Germany
Unknown Facility
Ahmedabad, 380009, India
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, 560003, India
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, 560034, India
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, 560054, India
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, 560076, India
Unknown Facility
Hyderabad, 500 033, India
Unknown Facility
Jaipur, 302 015, India
Unknown Facility
New Delhi, 110029, India
Unknown Facility
New Delhi, 110076, India
Unknown Facility
Secunderabad, 500003, India
Unknown Facility
Ferrara, 44100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Florence, 50141, Italy
Unknown Facility
Monserrato, 09042, Italy
Unknown Facility
Prato, 59100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Reggio Emilia, 42100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Roma, 00161, Italy
Unknown Facility
Siena, 53100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Kaunas, 50009, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, 92288, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, 85-168, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, 30-119, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, 31-121, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, 20-607, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, 20-954, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, 60-218, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, 87-100, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 00-235, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 00-909, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 02-256, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, 51-124, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kazan', 4420029, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, 115522, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, 123060, Russia
Unknown Facility
Voronezh, 394066, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yaroslavl, 150062, Russia
Unknown Facility
Košice, 040 66, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Piešťany, 921 01, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, 7405, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, 7500, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, 8001, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Durban, 4001, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, 0084, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, 0184, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa
Unknown Facility
A Coruña, 15006, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, 14004, Spain
Unknown Facility
Lugo, 27004, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, 28009, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, 28046, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, 28222, Spain
Unknown Facility
Oviedo, 33006, Spain
Unknown Facility
Oviedo, 33012, Spain
Unknown Facility
Sabadell, 08208, Spain
Unknown Facility
Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bath, BA1 1RL, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Cannock, WS11 5XY, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Greenock, PA16 0XN, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Leeds, LS7 4SA, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Wigan, WN6 9EW, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Sieper J, Porter-Brown B, Thompson L, Harari O, Dougados M. Assessment of short-term symptomatic efficacy of tocilizumab in ankylosing spondylitis: results of randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):95-100. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203559. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
PMID: 23765873DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffman-LaRoche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2010
First Posted
September 27, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 11, 2013
Results First Posted
February 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-01