Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the FLEXUS(TM) Interspinous Spacer
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Investigation of the FLEXUS(TM) Interspinous Spacer: A Pivotal Study
1 other identifier
interventional
215
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the FLEXUS™ Interspinous Spacer as compared to the XSTOP® Spacer for the treatment of patients who are suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 27, 2018
CompletedJune 1, 2018
May 1, 2018
7.1 years
July 1, 2010
December 13, 2017
May 31, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With Less Pain/Disability Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Score
Change in the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) score at 24 months compared with the score at baseline as follows: * Change of \>0.5 points in Physical Function on a scale of 1-4 points (lower values are considered a better outcome) * Change of \>0.5 points in Symptom Severity on a scale of 1-5 points (lower values are considered a better outcome) * Satisfaction of \<2.5 points on a scale of 1-4 points (lower values are considered a better outcome) The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire is a three part form that quantifies severity of symptoms, physical function characteristics, and patient's satisfaction after treatment.
24 months
Number of Participants With a Successful Neurologic Status
Neurological status is based on four types of measurement parameters: motor, sensory, reflexes, and special assessments. Each parameter will be coded as follows: Motor 0 Total Paralysis 1. Palpable or Visible Contraction 2. Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated 3. Active Movement, Against Gravity 4. Active Movement, Against Some Resistance 5. Active Movement, Against Full Resistance Sensory 0 Absent 1. Impaired 2. Normal Reflexes 0 Absent or Trace 1. Hyper-reflexic 2. Normal or hypo-reflexic Straight Leg Raise 0 0°-70° (abnormal) 1 \>70°-90° (normal) If all evaluations for the parameter are determined to be normal, then the parameter is given a normal status. If any evaluations for the parameter are abnormal, then the parameter is given an abnormal status. The overall neurological status will be considered a success if and only if all the four parameters are stable or improved.
24 months
Number of Participants With no Additional Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis at the Spinal Level That Was Treated
Measures the number of participants who did not have another surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis at the same spinal level that was originally treated. Data, including adverse events, were monitored, evaluated and assessed for evidence of additional surgical treatment at the spinal level that was originally treated.
24 months
Number of Participants With an Absence of Implant-related Complications
Absence of implant-related complications, including device dislodgement, defined as: * Failure of implant material (e.g. fracture); * Implant migration outside of the interspinous space (posteriorly beyond the posterior margin of the spinous processes, anteriorly within the spinal canal, or laterally more than half of the implant width); or * Other complications that can be specifically associated with the implanted device.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 24 Months
24 months
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Back Pain at 24 Months
24 months
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Right Leg Pain at 24 Months
24 months
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Left Leg Pain at 24 Months
24 months
Change of Quality of Life
24 months
Study Arms (2)
FLEXUS™ Interspinous Spacer
EXPERIMENTALXSTOP® Interspinous Spacer
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the FLEXUS™ Interspinous Spacer
Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the XSTOP® Spacer
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lumbar spinal stenosis as defined by leg, buttock or groin pain, with or without back pain, that relieves during flexion, with radiographic confirmation of spinal stenosis by CT or MRI scans at one or two contiguous levels between L1 and S1. If back pain is also present, it must be partially relieved during flexion
- Narrowing of the spinal canal, nerve root canal or intervertebral foramen at one or two levels
- Able to sit for 50 minutes without pain
- Able to walk 50 feet or more
- Age 50 years or over
- Has completed at least 6 months of conservative treatment
- Has a Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) score of ≥ 1.5 for Physical Function (PF) and ≥ 1.5 for Symptom Severity (SS)
- Other as specified in the approved protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Cannot sit for 50 minutes without pain
- Cannot walk for more than 50 feet
- Unremitting pain in any spinal position
- Axial back pain only without leg, buttock, or groin pain
- Fixed motor deficit
- Cauda equine syndrome, defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder (bladder retension or incontinence) dysfunction
- Severe symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis at more than two levels
- Significant instability of the lumbar spine
- Has had any surgery of the lumbar spine
- Morbid obesity defined as a body mass index \>40 or a weight more than 100 lbs over ideal body weight
- Active systemic disease such as AIDS, HIV, Hepatitis, etc.
- Active systemic or local infection
- Angina, active rheumatoid arthritis, advanced diabetes or any other systemic disease that would affect the subject's welfare or outcome of the study
- Osteoporosis, defined as DEXA bone density measured T-score \< -2.5
- Spinal metastasis to the vertebrae
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Skyridge Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80124, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Globus Medical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2010
First Posted
July 5, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 1, 2018
Results First Posted
April 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05