A Pivotal Study of a Facet Replacement System to Treat Spinal Stenosis
The Investigational Plan for the Evaluation of the ACADIA® Facet Replacement System
1 other identifier
interventional
390
2 countries
29
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the ACADIA® Facet Replacement System is effective in the treatment of spinal stenosis. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the overall success rate of the Anatomic Facet Replacement System in patients with spinal stenosis when compared to a posterior spinal fusion control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 10, 2020
CompletedSeptember 10, 2020
August 1, 2020
10.8 years
November 17, 2006
August 10, 2020
August 24, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Measure of Pain/Disability Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Physical Function Score
Physical Function is measured on a scale of 1-4 points (lower values are considered a better outcome)
24 months
Measure of Pain/Disability Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Symptom Severity Score
Symptom Severity is measured on a scale of 1-5 points (lower values are considered a better outcome)
24 months
Number of Participants Who Maintained or Improved in Neurological Status.
Neurological status is based on four types of measurement parameters: muscle strength, straight leg raise, sensory function, and reflexes. Each of the four parameters will be coded as Stable or Improved OR Deteriorated. Neurological assessment scores must be stable or improved compared with the preoperative baseline to be considered "Stable or Improved" neurological status. If these scores have deteriorated as compared to the preoperative baseline, then the neurological status is considered "Deteriorated".
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Right Leg Pain
24 months
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Left Leg Pain
24 months
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain
24 months
Number of Participants With a Change of at Least 15 Points in Pain/Disability Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score at 24 Months Compared With the Score at Baseline
24 months
Study Arms (2)
ACADIA®
EXPERIMENTALInvestigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system
Control Instrumented PLF
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl surgical treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion
Interventions
Non-randomized investigational ACADIA Facet Replacement System used for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
Randomized investigational ACADIA Facet Replacement System used for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
Randomized control treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age and skeletally mature;
- Have undergone 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to surgery;
- Lateral, lateral recess and/or central canal stenosis;
- Disc height measuring ≥ 4 mm at the operative level;
- Persistent leg, thigh and/or buttock symptoms,including pain,numbness, burning or tingling with a minimum leg pain score of 40mm as measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Index;
- A score greater than 2 on a scale of 1-5 on the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Symptom Severity (SS) Score-Candidate;
- A score greater than or equal to 2 on a scale of 1-4 on the ZCQ Physical Function (PF) Score;
- A candidate for a decompression with full facetectomy at the operative level
- Candidate for a posterior lumbar fusion;
- Physically and mentally willing and able to comply evaluations;
- Lives in the immediate area and has no plans to relocate;
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgical procedure at the operative or adjacent level except for one of the following: Micro-discectomy, laminectomy, lamino/foraminotomy, rhizotomy, IDET, and/or interspinous spacer;
- Previous lumbar fusion or disc replacement procedure;
- Osteoporosis;
- greater than Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis;
- Spondylolisthesis at levels other than at the operative level;
- Scoliosis of the lumbar spine (defined as more than 11 deg Cobb angle) as indicated by plain X-ray films;
- Primary diagnosis of discogenic back pain due to torn, herniated, inflamed or irritated disc or other pathology where the patient exhibits axial back pain from degenerative disc disease;
- Acute traumatic pars fracture at the operative/adjacent level vertebral body;
- Spinal stenosis at more than three lumbar segments;
- Acute trauma to the lumbar spine within the last 24 months;
- Active infection at the operative level, or a systemic infection;
- Physically / mentally compromised;
- Systemic disease that would affect the patient's welfare or the research study.
- Immunologically suppressed or immunocompromised;
- Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (Type I Diabetes);
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (29)
Spine Group Beverly Hills
Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States
Cedars-Sinai Spine Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Desert Orthopaedic Center
Rancho Mirage, California, 92270, United States
Boulder Neurosurgical & Spine Associates
Boulder, Colorado, 80303, United States
Spine Colorado
Durango, Colorado, 81301, United States
Rocky Mountain Associates (RMA) in Orthopedic Medicine
Loveland, Colorado, 80538, United States
Florida Spine Institute
Clearwater, Florida, 33765, United States
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education
Tampa, Florida, 33637, United States
Neurological Institute of Savannah and Center for Spine
Savannah, Georgia, 31405, United States
Indiana Spine Group
Carmel, Indiana, 46032, United States
Fort Wayne Orthopaedics
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804, United States
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101, United States
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics
Owings Mills, Maryland, 21117, United States
UMASS Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States
Spine Midwest, Inc.
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65101, United States
Springfield Neurological & Spine Institute
Springfield, Missouri, 65804, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208, United States
Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, P.C.
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
OrthoCarolina Spine Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Riverhills Healthcare
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
Charleston Brain & Spine
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Neuro-Spine Solutions
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620, United States
The Center for Sports Medicine & Orthopedics
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404, United States
Central Texas Spine Institute
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
University of Puerto Rico
San Juan, 00921, Puerto Rico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Globus Medical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2006
First Posted
November 20, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 10, 2020
Results First Posted
September 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08