Study Stopped
Company has ceased operation
Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
Clinical Study Comparing Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine With the Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System to Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion - In Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
1 other identifier
interventional
480
1 country
19
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to assess whether the Stabilimax NZ® is at least as safe and effective as the control therapy of fusion in patients receiving decompression surgery for the treatment of clinically symptomatic spinal stenosis at one contiguous vertebral levels from L1-S1. Safety and effectiveness will be assessed by means of primary study endpoints which address improvements in pain and function in the absence of major device related complications. The study hypothesis criteria for demonstrating safety and efficacy requires scientific evidence that patients classified as satisfying the primary study endpoint post device implantation is at least as good for Stabilimax NZ® recipients as that for patients undergoing fusion with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation at the 24 month followup assessment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedAugust 11, 2010
August 1, 2010
3.8 years
September 13, 2007
August 10, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decrease in leg pain of 20 mm on a VAS pain scale; Decrease of ≥ .5 on ZCQ for both Symptom Severity and Physical Function; No major device-related complications; and No surgical revision, reoperation, removal, or supplemental fixation at treated level
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reduction in OR Time, Blood Loss, Hospital Stay. Improvement in quality of life and return to work. Improvement in the incidence of adverse events. Radiographic evidence of nonfusion.
2 years
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALPosterior Dynamic Stabilization with the Stabilimax NZ
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORPosteriolateral instrumented fusion
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Radiographic:
- Degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine, central, lateral recess, or foraminal;
- Evidence of the cal sac and/or cauda equina compression, nerve root impingement, hypertrophic facets with canal encroachment, with or without spondylolisthesis, if present, no more than grade 1
- General:
- The greater of the patients right and left VAS leg pain score is ≥ 40 mm on a 100 mm scale;
- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Symptom Severity score greater than 2 on a scale of 1-5;
- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical Function score greater than or equal to 2 on a scale of 1-4;
- Intermittent neurogenic claudication
- At least six months of non-surgical management.
- Skeletally mature patients at least 21 years of age;
- Willing to provide written consent for participation and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization;
- Willing to undergo all study procedures including physical therapy and adhere to the follow-up schedule; and
- No additional surgical treatment is required outside the investigational or control at the time of surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Initial Screening:
- Prior surgery at any lumbar level including the level being treated except for: Lamino/Foraminotomy, Microdiscectomy, IDET, and Percutaneous Discectomy.
- Prior surgery at any lumbar level within one year of enrollment;
- No more than one prior surgery at any lumbar level;
- Previous acute trauma at the treated level within two years of enrollment;
- Primary and predominate diagnosis of discogenic back pain, e.g. torn disc, herniated disc inflamed or irritated disc, or other disc pathology;
- Symptomatic cervical and/or thoracic neurological compromise;
- Significant peripheral neuropathy or acute denervation secondary to radiculopathy, caused by conditions other than spinal stenosis;
- Other neurological pathology that could confound study results;
- Cauda Equina Syndrome;
- Contraindicated for MRI;
- Morbid obesity (BMI \> 40);
- Peripheral vascular disease requiring intervention (≥ 50% stenosis of vessel);
- Active systemic or surgical site infection;
- Any significant medical conditions that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing;
- +27 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
Surgical Specialty Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85015, United States
Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Tri-City Medical Center
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
Littleton Adventist Hospital
Littleton, Colorado, 80122, United States
New Britain General Hospital
New Britain, Connecticut, 06052, United States
Morton Plant Mease
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Largo Medical Center
Largo, Florida, 33770, United States
University Community Hospital at Carrolwood
Tampa, Florida, 33614, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Upstate Medical Center
Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States
North Carolina Specialty Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27704, United States
Blanchard Valley Hospital
Findlay, Ohio, 45840, United States
Sacred Heart Medical Center
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Lehigh Valley Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18105, United States
Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Presbyterian Plano Center for Diagnostics & Surgery
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
University of Utah Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
DePaul Medical Center
Norfolk, Virginia, 23505, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Guyer, MD
Texas Back Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Musante, M.D.
Triangle Orthopedics Associates
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neel Anand, M.D.
Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2007
First Posted
September 17, 2007
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 11, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-08