The Vertos MILD™ Preliminary Patient Evaluation Study
A Single-center, Prospective, Clinical Study to Assess the Clinical Application and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression With the MILD™ Devices in Patients With Symptomatic Central Foraminal Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single-center, open label, prospective clinical study to assess the clinical application and functional outcomes of symptomatic patients undergoing the Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (MILD™) treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. In this study, patient-reported outcomes over a 3 month period following treatment will be collected by the investigator. Periodic surveys for each study subject's pain, functional status, quality of life and physical examination will track outcomes following MILD™ treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 4, 2013
CompletedApril 10, 2013
April 1, 2013
10 months
September 8, 2008
January 18, 2013
April 2, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Changes in Back Pain as Measured by a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Clinical relevance established by change of two points or more on a ten point scale where zero represents no pain and ten represents worst pain imaginable. Mean change from baseline to Month 6 was reported with a positive number representing the baseline value minus the 6 month value.
Baseline and Six Months
Function as Measured Subjectively by the Oswestry Disability Index Patient Questionnaire
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is used to measure permanent functional disability through a series of questions which characterize the disturbance of activities of daily living resulting from chronic back pain. The questionnaire is divided into 10 topics including pain intensity , personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling and employment/homemaking. Each topic is rated 0 (no pain or no limitation) to 5 (high pain or very limited physically). The worst possible score is 50 (100% disability) and best would be zero (0% disability), thus a higher ODI score indicates greater disability.
Baseline and Month 6
Quality of Life as Measured by the PCS Subscale of the Short-form 12 Question (SF-12) Survey.
The 12-question SF-12v2 Health Survey is a validated generic measure of health status \& outcomes, as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease, or treatment group. The Physical Component Summary (PCS)takes into account the correlations among the Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), and Vitality (VT)SF-12v2 Health Survey scales to show the broad impact on PCS. Norm-based scoring is used so each scale has the same mean (50 points) and the same standard deviation (10 points) as the general US population in 1998. Scores below 50 indicate a decline in health status, with lower scores representing worse health status. Minimally Important Difference (MID) is a measure of true clinical relevance of a difference, with suggested MID for the Physical Component Summary (PCS) being 2 to 3 points. Change from baseline to 6 months is presented, where a positive value represents the 6 month value minus the baseline value.
Baseline and Six months
Study Arms (1)
Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression procedure
OTHERmild percutaneous lumbar decompression procedure
Interventions
The arthroscopic devices in this study are specialized surgical instruments intended to be used to perform percutaneous lumbar decompressive procedures for the treatment of various spinal conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) primarily caused by dorsal element hypertrophy.
- Prior failure of conservative therapy.
- Radiologic evidence of LSS (L3-L5), Ligamentum flavum \> 2.5 mm, confirmed by pre op MRI and/or CT.
- Central canal cross sectional area \< 100mm2.
- Anterior listhesis \< 2 - 3mm.
- Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain.
- Available to complete 12 weeks of follow-up.
- A signed Informed Consent Form is obtained from the patient.
- Adults ≥ 18 years of age.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
- History of recent spinal fractures with concurrent pain symptoms.
- Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than LSS (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
- Significant disk protrusion or osteophyte formation.
- Excessive facet hypertrophy.
- Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti coagulants.
- Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 5 days of treatment.
- Epidural steroids within prior three weeks.
- Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
- Any potential wound healing pathologies that may compromise outcomes, including: diabetes, excessive smoking history, cancer, connective tissue diseases, recent spine radiation and severe COPD.
- Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small pilot series with short follow-up. Procedure experience of investigator limited. Minimal information available regarding appropriate patient selection, thus patient pool confined to complex cases wait-listed for more aggressive laminectomy.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- VP Clinical, Regulatory, Quality
- Organization
- Vertos Medical
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daryl R Fourney, MD, FRCSC, FACS
University of Saskatchewan, Royal University Hospital, Divison of Neurosurgery
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2008
First Posted
September 9, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 10, 2013
Results First Posted
April 4, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04