Considering Patient Diet Preferences to Optimize Weight Loss
DietChoice
1 other identifier
interventional
207
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Obesity is increasingly common and can lead to decreased quality of life, increased medical and psychiatric illness, high health care costs, and early mortality. The problem of obesity is as great in veterans as it is in the general public. Adherence to dietary therapy for obesity is often inadequate, possibly because patients' food preferences are not considered during dietary counseling. Allowing patients to choose a diet based on their food preferences may increase their motivation to adhere to diet counseling. This, in turn, could enhance their weight loss success and, ultimately, reduce the many health complications and costs of obesity. The proposed study will examine whether assessing a person's food preferences, and then allowing the person to choose from two commonly prescribed diets, results in greater weight loss success.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started May 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 22, 2014
CompletedApril 12, 2019
January 1, 2019
2 years
June 14, 2010
October 17, 2014
January 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to 48 Weeks
Baseline, 48 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Diet Adherence as Measured by Block Food-frequency Questionnaire (Absolute Percentage Deviation From the Goal Macronutrient Intake--<30% Fat for Low-fat Diet or <10% Carbohydrate for Low-carbohydrate Diet)
48 weeks
Change in Obesity-specific Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire From Baseline to 48 Weeks
Baseline, 48 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are allowed to choose between a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss after receiving information about these diets and their food preferences (Choice arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.
Arm 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants are randomly assigned to (rather than getting to choose, as in the experimental arm) a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss (Control arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm do not have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.
Interventions
Participants are allowed to choose between a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss after receiving information about these diets and their food preferences (Choice arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.
Participants are randomly assigned to (rather than getting to choose, as in the experimental arm) a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss (Control arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm do not have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Body mass index 30 or greater
- Stable health
- Desire to lose weight
- Agrees to attend regular visits
- Access to telephone and reliable transportation
- Has a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) provider
You may not qualify if:
- Certain chronic or unstable disease (kidney or liver disease, type 1 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c 12% or more, insulin use, unstable heart disease, transplant recipient, blood pressure 160/100 or greater, fasting blood triglycerides 600 or greater, LDL cholesterol 190 or greater)
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, lack of birth control
- Active dementia, psychiatric illness, or substance abuse (past year)
- Weight loss therapy in previous month
- Pacemaker or defibrillator
- Enrolled in another study that might affect measurements
- Previously in study of low-carbohydrate or low-fat diet for weight loss
- Unable to complete all study measures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Related Publications (9)
McVay MA, Yancy WS Jr, Vijan S, Van Scoyoc L, Neelon B, Voils CI, Maciejewski ML. Obesity-related health status changes and weight-loss treatment utilization. Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.018.
PMID: 24745636BACKGROUNDYancy WS. Peer Support Significantly Improves Compliance in Veterans with Diabetes. U. S. Medicine. 2012 Nov 20.
BACKGROUNDYancy WS Jr, McVay MA, Brinkworth GD. Adherence to diets for weight loss. JAMA. 2013 Dec 25;310(24):2676. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282639. No abstract available.
PMID: 24368474RESULTMcVay MA, Jeffreys AS, King HA, Olsen MK, Voils CI, Yancy WS Jr. The relationship between pretreatment dietary composition and weight loss during a randomised trial of different diet approaches. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28 Suppl 2:16-23. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12188. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
PMID: 24251378RESULTMcVay MA, Voils CI, Coffman CJ, Geiselman PJ, Kolotkin RL, Mayer SB, Smith VA, Gaillard L, Turner MJ, Yancy WS Jr. Factors associated with choice of a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet during a behavioral weight loss intervention. Appetite. 2014 Dec;83:117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
PMID: 25149197RESULTYancy WS Jr, Coffman CJ, Geiselman PJ, Kolotkin RL, Almirall D, Oddone EZ, Mayer SB, Gaillard LA, Turner M, Smith VA, Voils CI. Considering patient diet preference to optimize weight loss: design considerations of a randomized trial investigating the impact of choice. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 May;35(1):106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
PMID: 23506974RESULTYancy WS Jr, Mayer SB, Coffman CJ, Smith VA, Kolotkin RL, Geiselman PJ, McVay MA, Oddone EZ, Voils CI. Effect of Allowing Choice of Diet on Weight Loss: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 16;162(12):805-14. doi: 10.7326/M14-2358.
PMID: 26075751RESULTYancy WS Jr, McVay MA, Voils CI. Effect of allowing choice of diet on weight loss--in response. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):805-6. doi: 10.7326/L15-5159. No abstract available.
PMID: 26571246RESULTMcVay MA, Voils CI, Geiselman PJ, Smith VA, Coffman CJ, Mayer S, Yancy WS Jr. Food preferences and weight change during low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets. Appetite. 2016 Aug 1;103:336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PMID: 27133551RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- William S. Yancy, Jr.
- Organization
- VA Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William S. Yancy, MD MHS
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2010
First Posted
June 29, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 12, 2019
Results First Posted
October 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2019-01