NCT01152359

Brief Summary

Obesity is increasingly common and can lead to decreased quality of life, increased medical and psychiatric illness, high health care costs, and early mortality. The problem of obesity is as great in veterans as it is in the general public. Adherence to dietary therapy for obesity is often inadequate, possibly because patients' food preferences are not considered during dietary counseling. Allowing patients to choose a diet based on their food preferences may increase their motivation to adhere to diet counseling. This, in turn, could enhance their weight loss success and, ultimately, reduce the many health complications and costs of obesity. The proposed study will examine whether assessing a person's food preferences, and then allowing the person to choose from two commonly prescribed diets, results in greater weight loss success.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
207

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 14, 2010

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 29, 2010

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2011

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2013

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 22, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 14, 2010

Results QC Date

October 17, 2014

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

obesitydiet, low carbohydratediet, fat-restrictedfood preferencesquality of lifepatient compliance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to 48 Weeks

    Baseline, 48 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Diet Adherence as Measured by Block Food-frequency Questionnaire (Absolute Percentage Deviation From the Goal Macronutrient Intake--<30% Fat for Low-fat Diet or <10% Carbohydrate for Low-carbohydrate Diet)

    48 weeks

  • Change in Obesity-specific Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire From Baseline to 48 Weeks

    Baseline, 48 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants are allowed to choose between a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss after receiving information about these diets and their food preferences (Choice arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.

Behavioral: Choice

Arm 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants are randomly assigned to (rather than getting to choose, as in the experimental arm) a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss (Control arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm do not have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.

Behavioral: Control

Interventions

ChoiceBEHAVIORAL

Participants are allowed to choose between a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss after receiving information about these diets and their food preferences (Choice arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.

Arm 1
ControlBEHAVIORAL

Participants are randomly assigned to (rather than getting to choose, as in the experimental arm) a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss (Control arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm do not have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.

Arm 2

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 74 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Body mass index 30 or greater
  • Stable health
  • Desire to lose weight
  • Agrees to attend regular visits
  • Access to telephone and reliable transportation
  • Has a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) provider

You may not qualify if:

  • Certain chronic or unstable disease (kidney or liver disease, type 1 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c 12% or more, insulin use, unstable heart disease, transplant recipient, blood pressure 160/100 or greater, fasting blood triglycerides 600 or greater, LDL cholesterol 190 or greater)
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, lack of birth control
  • Active dementia, psychiatric illness, or substance abuse (past year)
  • Weight loss therapy in previous month
  • Pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Enrolled in another study that might affect measurements
  • Previously in study of low-carbohydrate or low-fat diet for weight loss
  • Unable to complete all study measures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • McVay MA, Yancy WS Jr, Vijan S, Van Scoyoc L, Neelon B, Voils CI, Maciejewski ML. Obesity-related health status changes and weight-loss treatment utilization. Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.018.

    PMID: 24745636BACKGROUND
  • Yancy WS. Peer Support Significantly Improves Compliance in Veterans with Diabetes. U. S. Medicine. 2012 Nov 20.

    BACKGROUND
  • Yancy WS Jr, McVay MA, Brinkworth GD. Adherence to diets for weight loss. JAMA. 2013 Dec 25;310(24):2676. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282639. No abstract available.

  • McVay MA, Jeffreys AS, King HA, Olsen MK, Voils CI, Yancy WS Jr. The relationship between pretreatment dietary composition and weight loss during a randomised trial of different diet approaches. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28 Suppl 2:16-23. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12188. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

  • McVay MA, Voils CI, Coffman CJ, Geiselman PJ, Kolotkin RL, Mayer SB, Smith VA, Gaillard L, Turner MJ, Yancy WS Jr. Factors associated with choice of a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet during a behavioral weight loss intervention. Appetite. 2014 Dec;83:117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

  • Yancy WS Jr, Coffman CJ, Geiselman PJ, Kolotkin RL, Almirall D, Oddone EZ, Mayer SB, Gaillard LA, Turner M, Smith VA, Voils CI. Considering patient diet preference to optimize weight loss: design considerations of a randomized trial investigating the impact of choice. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 May;35(1):106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

  • Yancy WS Jr, Mayer SB, Coffman CJ, Smith VA, Kolotkin RL, Geiselman PJ, McVay MA, Oddone EZ, Voils CI. Effect of Allowing Choice of Diet on Weight Loss: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 16;162(12):805-14. doi: 10.7326/M14-2358.

  • Yancy WS Jr, McVay MA, Voils CI. Effect of allowing choice of diet on weight loss--in response. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):805-6. doi: 10.7326/L15-5159. No abstract available.

  • McVay MA, Voils CI, Geiselman PJ, Smith VA, Coffman CJ, Mayer S, Yancy WS Jr. Food preferences and weight change during low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets. Appetite. 2016 Aug 1;103:336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ObesityFood PreferencesPatient Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsFeeding BehaviorBehaviorPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth Behavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
William S. Yancy, Jr.
Organization
VA Medical Center

Study Officials

  • William S. Yancy, MD MHS

    Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2010

First Posted

June 29, 2010

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

August 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 12, 2019

Results First Posted

October 22, 2014

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations